| Literature DB >> 30373670 |
Caroline Beninger1, Syed Ali Naqvi1, Sohail Naushad1, Karin Orsel1, Chris Luby2, Hooman Derakhshani3, Ehsan Khafipour3, Jeroen De Buck4.
Abstract
Digital dermatitis (DD) presents as painful, ulcerative or proliferative lesions that lead to bovine lameness affecting economic efficiency and animal welfare. Although DD etiological agent(s) have not been established, it is widely accepted that DD is a polymicrobial disease significantly associated with species of Treponema and the non-linear disease progression may be attributed to interactions among infecting bacteria. We postulated the morphological changes associated with DD lesion grades are related to interactions among infecting species of Treponema. We developed a novel species-specific qPCR that can identify the absolute abundance of the four of the most common species of Treponema in DD, T. phagedenis, T. medium, T. pedis and T. denticola, in a single reaction. We found species abundance and the number of distinct Treponema species present is higher in active, ulcerative lesions than in healing lesions, chronic lesions, and DD-free skin. Treponema spp. were present in both DD-free skin and M3 lesions following treatment with oxytetracycline. We have also found positive correlations among T. phagedenis, T. medium and T. pedis indicating they are significantly more likely to be found together than apart and their absolute quantities tend to increase together, a relationship which is not present with T. denticola. Further, we found Treponema, particularly viable T. denticola, in lesions 5 days post treatment with oxytetracycline (M3). Our findings suggest that pathogenicity may be closely associated with Treponema abundance, particularly T. phagedenis, T. medium and T. pedis, and interactions among them, independent of T. denticola. Our results provide a novel, consistent method to identify species of Treponema within DD lesions and associate Treponema spp. and abundance with morphological changes related to host pathogenicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373670 PMCID: PMC6206660 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-018-0605-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Primer and probe sequences for species-specific fourplex qPCR and conventional PCR
| Species | Forward primer (sense) | Probe (sense) | Reverse Primer (antisense) | Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| GGAAACTTAGGAATTCGATATGTAG | AGCATACAGCGATTATAACAAAGCCCTCGA | CCTTCTTTAGTTTCTTTGTGAGG | 113 |
|
| AAAGCGCTACGAATCCTAAG | TGCACCCTTGTTTACTACTGCACAGCC | ATCATTACCCGTCCACAAAG | 119 |
|
| CCCGCAGGAAGGTATAATC | AATCCGCCTACGACTGCGATACCA | CACAGCTGTTGTGGTATTAAG | 90 |
|
| ACACCGATTGTACTGAATGA | ACTACACGTGGAGTACCGAATGCT | CCACGAGCTTTCTACAGATT | 118 |
|
| AGGAATGGCCTTTGAACCCGCA | CCGATGAACCCGTATCTTCACCGA | 458 | |
|
| GGAACAGGCAGCCGCATTGGAT | CCGCCCATGTGAGGCTTGTGAT | 515 | |
|
| TCCGCCTACGACTGCGATACCA | CGGAACTGTCACAACTGGCGGA | 785 | |
|
| TGGATGTTACGGAAGAGACACCGA | TGCCCCACTCTTACAAGTTCATCCCA | 295 |
aPrimer and probe sequences for species of Treponema for qPCR.
bConventional PCR primer sequences for Treponema species.
Figure 1Microbiome analysis indicating ASVs designated to the genus from DNA directly extracted from DD-infected biopsies ( = 16). Accession numbers are included for Treponema spp. that could not be identified at the species level but were identified as members of the genus Treponema.
Representation of all biopsies collected and cultured from 10 Alberta farms, 1 Saskatchewan farm, and an Alberta slaughterhouse, by lesion grade
| Farm | No. cows | Lesion grade | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M4.1 | ||
| 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 4 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | 15 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 9 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| 10 | 26 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 11S | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Abattoir | 9 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 142 | 31 | 16 | 40 | 13 | 15 | 37 |
SIndicates Saskatchewan farm.
Spiking experiment results indicating the efficiency of DNA extraction and detection, with and without bovine tissue, using species-specific qPCR
| Species | 1 | 1/10 | 1/100 | Average efficiency (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culture | Tissue (count/mg) | Culture | Tissue (count/mg) | Culture | Tissue (count/mg) | ||
|
| 2.32 × 108 | 4.22 × 107 | 2.78 × 108 | 3.32 × 107 | 2.26 × 107 | 1.04 × 107 | 99.5 |
|
| 8.72 × 107 | 9.76 × 105 | 1.40 × 108 | 6.80 × 106 | 1.22 × 107 | 9.45 × 105 | 98.8 |
|
| 1.41 × 109 | 7.93 × 107 | 6.85 × 105 | 7.80 × 104 | 9.31 × 104 | 5.25 × 103 | 96.0 |
|
| 2.58 × 106 | 1.24 × 105 | 4.14 × 105 | 8.36 × 104 | 1.23 × 105 | 1.59 × 104 | 98.2 |
aCq values were converted into gene copy numbers and the mean count between samples without tissue was compared to the mean count with tissue samples of tenfold serially diluted Treponema cultures.
Figure 2The proportion of DD lesions or lesion-free biopsies containing 1, 2, 3 or 4 species of Lesion-free, healing and chronic lesions (M0, M3, and M4, respectively) depicted on the left and active lesions on the right (M2 and M4.1 lesions).
Identification of four species ( = 142) according to lesion grade by culture and species-specific PCR
| Lesion grade | No. samples with species present (%) | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| No spp. | ||
| M0 | 3 (9.7) | 1 (3.2) | 2 (6.5) | 2 (6.5) | 23 (74.2) | 31 (100) |
| M1 | 15 (93.8) | 14 (87.5) | 11 (68.8) | 4 (25) | 0 (0) | 16 (100) |
| M2 | 40 (100) | 35 (87.5) | 32 (80) | 24 (60) | 0 (0) | 40 (100) |
| M3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (15.4) | 13 (100) | 2 (15.4) | 13 (100) |
| M4 | 13 (86.7) | 10 (66.7) | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) | 0 (0) | 15 (100) |
| M4.1 | 35 (94.6) | 26 (70.3) | 24 (64.9) | 10 (27) | 0 (0) | 37 (100) |
| Total | 106 (69.7) | 86 (56.6) | 82 (53.9) | 55 (36.2) | 25 (16.4) | 152 (100) |
Figure 3Species combinations within digital dermatitis lesions according to lesion grade. Each colour represents a mutually exclusive species composition (singlet, pair, triplet or quadruplet) within a lesion. Lesion-free, healing and chronic lesions depicted on the left and active lesions on the right. De: T. denticola; Me: T. medium; Pe: T. pedis; Ph: T. phagedenis.
Difference between the natural logarithm of abundance (copies/mg of tissue) of species across lesion grades
| Lesion comparison | Species | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| M0–M1 | −2.07 | −3.70** | −4.44*** | −6.30*** | −4.20*** |
| M0–M2 | 1.97 | −3.72*** | 4.21ǂ | −6.75*** | −3.82*** |
| M0–M3 | −1.91 | 1.67 | −3.20 | −4.77 | −0.84 |
| M0–M4 | 1.22 | −2.02 | 3.76 | 5.13** | −2.07 |
| M0–M4.1 | 1.80 | −2.17 | −2.90 | 5.58*** | −2.64* |
| M1–M2 | 1.33 | 1.83 | 2.97 | −4.69 | 0.39 |
| M1–M3 | 1.06 | 1.70 | 2.52* | −3.60*** | 3.36** |
| M1–M4 | 1.16 | 1.53 | −2.68ǂ | −3.52 | 2.14 |
| M1–M4.1 | −0.84 | −1.86 | −2.23 | 1.53 | 1.57 |
| M2–M3 | −0.74 | 1.86 | 1.53 | 1.98*** | 2.98*** |
| M2–M4 | −0.74 | 1.56 | 1.24 | 2.07 | 1.75 |
| M2–M4.1 | −0.64 | −0.30 | −0.68 | 1.62 | 1.18 |
| M3–M4 | −0.16 | −0.16 | 0.29 | −1.17 | −1.23 |
| M3–M4.1 | −0.10 | 0.14 | −0.45 | 0.45ǂ | −1.79 |
| M4–M4.1 | −0.10 | 0.02 | −0.23 | −0.08 | −0.57 |
Negative values indicate the mean log abundance was that amount less the lesion grade on the right; positive values indicate the mean log abundance was that amount greater than the lesion grade on the right. Values represent the difference in species abundance between lesion grades (e.g. T. denticola is 2.07 times less abundant in M0s compared to M1s).
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ǂ 0.051 < P < 0.9.
Difference between lesion grades in log odds of finding species across lesion grades assuming no relationships or dependence among species
| Lesion Comparisona | Species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| M0–M1 | −0.77 | −19.72 | −2.55* | −3.28** |
| M0–M2 | −3.86*** | −19.80 | −2.82*** | −3.26*** |
| M0–M3 | −4.96*** | 0.00 | −0.37 | 16.49 |
| M0–M4 | −3.95 | −20.26 | −3.69* | −20.65 |
| M0–M4.1 | −3.52** | −18.94 | −1.99ǂ | −3.64*** |
| M1–M2 | −3.09ǂ | −0.08 | −0.27 | 0.03 |
| M1–M3 | −4.19** | 19.72 | 2.17 | 19.77 |
| M1–M4 | −3.18 | −0.54 | −1.14 | −17.36 |
| M1–M4.1 | −2.75 | 0.78 | 0.56 | −0.35 |
| M2–M3 | −1.10 | 19.80 | 2.44* | 19.74 |
| M2–M4 | −0.09 | −0.46 | −0.87 | −17.39 |
| M2–M4.1 | 0.34 | 0.86 | 0.82 | −0.38 |
| M3–M4 | 1.01 | −20.26 | −3.31 | −37.13 |
| M3–M4.1 | 1.44 | −18.94 | −1.62 | −20.12 |
| M4–M4.1 | 0.43 | 1.32 | 1.70 | 17.01 |
aNegative value indicates lesion grade on the left is exp(log odds) times less likely to contain the given species; positive value indicates lesion grade on the left is exp(log odds) times more likely to contain the given species.
* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ǂ 0.051 < P < 0.90.
Figure 4Species-specific bacterial cell numbers standardized by biopsy tissue weight (mg) of four species according to DD lesion grades. Dots in different colors represent bacterial cell numbers of four different species as shown in the legends. Horizontal bars represent average bacterial cell numbers for different lesion grades in the same colors.