| Literature DB >> 30373624 |
Natalia Dłużniewska1, Piotr Podolec1, Maciej Skubera1, Monika Smaś-Suska1, Jacek Pająk2, Małgorzata Urbańczyk-Zawadzka3, Wojciech Płazak1, Maria Olszowska1, Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pająk4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) is the most common cyanotic congenital heart disease and the population of ToF repair survivors is growing rapidly. Adults with repaired ToF develop late complications. The aim of this study was to describe and analyze long-term follow-up of patients with repaired ToF.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance; Echocardiography cardiopulmonary exercise test; Long term follow up; Tetralogy of Fallot
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373624 PMCID: PMC6206664 DOI: 10.1186/s12947-018-0146-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Ultrasound ISSN: 1476-7120 Impact factor: 2.062
Baseline demographics and surgical characteristics of patients who did not undergo PVR
| All patients ( | Group 1 < 25 years since repair ( | Group 2 ≥ 25 years since repair ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median age with interquartile range (yr) | 26 (19–64) | 25 (19–49) | 37 (21–64) | < 0.001 |
| Male/female | 49/34 | 32/19 | 17/15 | 0.39 |
| Height | 168.3 ± 10.8 | 169.9 ± 12.2 | 165.8 ± 7.7 | 0.11 |
| Weight | 64.7 ± 14.8 | 63.5 ± 15.4 | 66.6 ± 14.0 | 0.40 |
| BMI | 22.8 ± 4.4 | 21.9 ± 4.5 | 24.1 ± 4.0 | 0.04 |
| BSA | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 0.94 |
| Median age with interquartile range at ToF repair (yr) | 3 (0–30) | 3 (0–30) | 3 (0–30) | 0.66 |
| Time since ToF repair (yr) | 23 (6–53) | 21 (6–24) | 31 (25–53) | < 0.001 |
| Number with prior Blalock – Taussig shunt | 17 | 6 | 11 | 0.02 |
| Number with transannular patch | 39 | 29 | 10 | 0.02 |
| NYHA functional class | NYHA I – 56 | NYHA I – 38 | NYHA I – 18 | 0.23 |
| NYHA II – 23 | NYHA II – 13 | NYHA II – 10 | NYHA I – 0.08 | |
| NYHA III – 4 | NYHA III – 0 | NYHA III – 4 | NYHA II – 0.38 | |
| NYHA IV – 0 | NYHA IV –0 | NYHA IV –0 | NYHA III – 0.98 |
BMI Body mass index, BSA Body surface area, NYHA New York Heart Association
Results of patients’ cardiopulmonary exercise testing of patients who did not undergo PVR
| CPET variable | Mean value ± SD ( | Group 1 < 25 years since repair ( | Group 2 ≥ 25 years since repair ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T [min] | 16.3 ± 3.3.4 | 16.9 ± 3.6 | 15.5 ± 2.8 | 0.08 |
| HR peak [beat/min] | 157 ± 29 | 164 ± 29 | 146 ± 26 | < 0.001 |
| HR peak [%N] | 70 ± 33 | 71 ± 29 | 69 ± 35 | 0.27 |
| SBP peak [mmHg] | 141 ± 23 | 141 ± 18 | 141 ± 30 | 0.96 |
| DBP peak [mmHg] | 73 ± 12 | 71 ± 12 | 75 ± 12 | 0.23 |
| VO2 peak | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 0.42 |
| VO2 peak [%N] | 69.1 ± 23.0 | 67.1 ± 23.5 | 72.0 ± 22.3 | 0.39 |
| VO2/kg peak [ml/min*kg] | 27.6 ± 8.2 | 28.6 ± 8.6 | 25.9 ± 7.5 | 0.18 |
| VO2max/kg [%N] | 76.3 ± 22.1 | 73.4 ± 22.3 | 80.5 ± 21.5 | 0.19 |
| VCO2 peak | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 0.34 |
| VCO2 peak [%N] | 57.5 ± 18.3 | 56.8 ± 19.5 | 58.4 ± 16.8 | 0.72 |
| RER peak | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.84 |
T Time, HR Heart rate, SBP Systolic blood pressure, DBP Diastolic blood pressure, VO Peak oxygen uptake, VO/kg Peak oxygen uptake per kilogram, VCO Peak carbon dioxide uptake, RER Respiratory exchange ratio
Results of patients’ echocardiography of patients who did not undergo PVR
| Echocardiography parameter | Mean value ± SD ( | Group 1 < 25 years since repair ( | Group 2 ≥ 25 years since repair ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RVOT prox [mm] | 30.5 ± 6.7 | 29.6 ± 5.8 | 31.9 ± 7.9 | 0.14 |
| RDVs [mm] | 36.1 ± 8.9 | 37.7 ± 9.3 | 33.9 ± 7.7 | 0.10 |
| RDVd [mm] | 71.6 ± 9.9 | 72.4 ± 10.6 | 70.3 ± 8.8 | 0.41 |
| LVD [mm] | 44.3 ± 5.9 | 43.9 ± 6.1 | 44.9 ± 5.6 | 0.45 |
| LVS [mm] | 28.2 ± 6.0 | 28.5 ± 4.7 | 27.7 ± 7.6 | 0.54 |
| RA area [cm2] | 19.3 ± 7.2 | 17.9 ± 4.9 | 21.5 ± 9.4 | 0.04 |
| LA area[cm2] | 14.9 ± 5.3 | 12.8 ± 2.3 | 17.8 ± 6.6 | < 0.001 |
| EF [%] | 58.7 ± 20.3 | 57.9 ± 20.1 | 60.0 ± 20.8 | 0.64 |
| PV gr.max [mmHg] | 24.3 ± 21.2 | 22.5 ± 16.3 | 27.2 ± 27.1 | 0.33 |
| PV gr.mean [mmHg] | 14.0 ± 12.9 | 12.7 ± 8.6 | 16.0 ± 17.6 | 0.26 |
| PV PHT | 104.3 ± 58.9 | 91.1 ± 42.0 | 126.2 ± 75.2 | 0.01 |
| Tricuspid annulus [mm] | 36.5 ± 7.3 | 36.0 ± 7.6 | 37.4 ± 6.8 | 0.57 |
| TAPSE [mm] | 21.2 ± 4.3 | 21.3 ± 4.1 | 21.2 ± 4.5 | 0.94 |
| S′ [cm/s] | 11.7 ± 2.0 | 11.8 ± 1.9 | 11.4 ± 2.1 | 0.43 |
| RVSP (mmHg) | 38.8 ± 16.5 | 36.0 ± 12.3 | 42.2 ± 20.4 | 0.20 |
RVOT Right ventricle outflow track, RDVs Right ventricle dimension at end systole, RDVd Right ventricle dimension at end diastole, LVD Left ventricle diastolic dimension, LVS Left ventricle systolic dimension, LA Left atrium, RA Right atrium, EF Ejection fraction, PV gr max Maximal pulmonary valve gradient, PV gr min Minimal pulmonary valve gradient, PV PHT Pulmonary valve pressure half time, TAPSE Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, S’ Systolic velocity of tricuspid annulus, RVSP Right ventricular systolic pressure
Results of patients’ cardiac magnetic resonance of patients who did not undergo PVR
| CMR parameter | Mean value ± SD ( | Group 1 < 25 years since repair ( | Group 2 ≥ 25 years since repair ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA area [cm2] | 20.2 ± 5.1 | 19.6 ± 5.4 | 21.1 ± 4.5 | 0.18 |
| RA area [cm2] | 26.3 ± 8.2 | 24.9 ± 7.2 | 28.4 ± 9.2 | 0.06 |
| RV area [cm2] | 41.9 ± 10.3 | 43.2 ± 11.0 | 40.3 ± 9.4 | 0.42 |
| LVD [cm] | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 4.8 ± 0.5 | 0.47 |
| LVS [cm] | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 0.72 |
| RV EF [%] | 50.7 ± 9.9 | 50.2 ± 8.9 | 51.5 ± 11.3 | 0.57 |
| RV EDV [ml] | 197.4 ± 61.9 | 202.6 ± 58.0 | 189.0 ± 67.8 | 0.33 |
| RV EDV indexed [ml/m2] | 112.9 ± 33.8 | 118.4 ± 28.4 | 103.8 ± 40.0 | 0.07 |
| RV ESV [ml] | 104.0 ± 47.8 | 95.4 ± 35.8 | 122. ± 65.5 | 0.17 |
| RV ESV indexed [ml/m2] | 59.8 ± 27.9 | 55.9 ± 16.8 | 66.7 ± 41.5 | 0.39 |
| RV mass [g] | 46.3 ± 19.5 | 47.3 ± 19.6 | 44.9 ± 19.5 | 0.59 |
| RV mass indexed [g/m2] | 27.5 ± 10.6 | 28.8 ± 10.6 | 25.7 ± 10.4 | 0.23 |
| LV EF [%] | 57.7 ± 7.6 | 56.6 ± 7.5 | 59.3 ± 7.4 | 0.11 |
| LV EDV [ml] | 129.8 ± 35.1 | 129.9 ± 36.9 | 129.6 ± 32.5 | 0.97 |
| LV EDV indexed [ml/m2] | 76.3 ± 17.0 | 76.3 ± 16.1 | 76.3 ± 18.7 | 0.99 |
| LV ESV [ml] | 56.1 ± 17.9 | 59.5 ± 18.9 | 49.7 ± 14.7 | 0.19 |
| LV ESV indexed [ml/m2] | 31.6 ± 8.2 | 33.6 ± 8.7 | 28.7 ± 6.6 | 0.19 |
| LV mass [g] | 100.9 ± 31.2 | 99.6 ± 33.4 | 102.8 ± 27.9 | 0.66 |
| LV mass indexed [g/m2] | 58.3 ± 14.8 | 58.3 ± 16.7 | 58.3 ± 11.8 | 0.98 |
| PRV [ml] | 54.4 ± 30.5 | 53.7 ± 26.8 | 55.6 ± 37.0 | 0.84 |
| PRV indexed [ml/m2] | 30.0 ± 17.2 | 28.0 ± 13.1 | 34.3 ± 23.7 | 0.30 |
| PRF [%] | 42.0 ± 10.3 | 42.6 ± 10.7 | 40.9 ± 10.1 | 0.67 |
CMR Cardiac magnetic resonance, LA Left atrium, RA Right atrium, RV Right ventricle, LVD Left ventricle diastolic dimension, LVS Left ventricle systolic dimension, RVEDV Right ventricle end-diastolic volume, RVESV Right ventricle end-systolic volume, RVEF Right ventricle ejection fraction, RV mass Right ventricle mass, LVEF Left ventricle ejection fraction, LVEDV Left ventricle end-diastolic volume, LVESV Left ventricle end-systolic volume, LV mass Left ventricle mass, PRV Pulmonary regurgitation volume, PRF Pulmonary regurgitation fraction
Fig 1Patients’ ECG and Holter monitor findings. AF Atrial fibrillation, AV Atrioventricular, RBB Right bundle branch block, VT Ventricular tachycardia