| Literature DB >> 30373520 |
Huiying Shi1, Hanhua Xiong1, Wei Qian1, Rong Lin2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The elderly population presents higher morbidity of H. pylori associated diseases in proximal stomach. The specific pathogenesis and mechanism have not been clearly addressed. The gastric environment for H. pylori colonization is dynamic with increasing age. The aim of present study is to investigate the correlation among the distribution of H. pylori, mucosal inflammation, gastric microenvironment and age.Entities:
Keywords: Aged; Helicobacter pylori; Metaplasia; Pyloric glands
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373520 PMCID: PMC6206908 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-018-0883-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Fig. 1A schematic illustration of Gastric biopsies carried out in present study. Gastric biopsies were obtained from the stomach in five locations: lesser curvature (mid-antrum, A1; mid-corpus, B1), greater curvature (mid-antrum, A2; mid-corpus, B2) and incisura angularis(IA) according to the updated Sydney system
Fig. 2The distribution and severity of H. pylori in stomach in different age groups. a H. pylori infection rates in antrum, incisura angularis (IA) and corpus with increasing age. b The H. pylori colonization density was graded by Giemsa staining (upper panel) and confocal laser endomicroscopy (lower panel). A total of 20 high power (× 40 objective) microscopic fields were randomly choosed in each Giemsa staining sample, and the average scores of those 20 fields for each slide were defined as H. pylori density scores. *** p < 0.001
The severity and distribution of H.pylori colonization with increasing age
| Age group | Antrum | IA | Corpus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young group (20y-25y) | 1.30 ± 0.11 | 1.12 ± 0.11* | 0.50 ± 0.10 | < 0.001 |
| Mid-aged group (40y-50y) | 1.52 ± 0.14 | 1.25 ± 0.12 | 1.05 ± 0.12 | 0.031 |
| Elderly group (>60y) | 1.58 ± 0.13 | 1.55 ± 0.12* | 1.58 ± 0.10 | 0.974 |
| Kruskal-Wallis H (p) | 0.257 | 0.031 | < 0.001 | – |
*means a statistically significant difference between young group and elderly group in IA, p = 0.002. IA incisura angularis
The characters of H. pylori associated gastric mucosal inflammation in different age population: H. pylori associated mucosal inflammation aggravate in elderly patient, especially in proximate stomach
| Age group | Antrum | IA | Corpus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young group(20y~25y) | 1.20 ± 0.17 | 0.85 ± 0.13 | 0.37 ± 0.10 | < 0.001 |
| Mid-aged group(40y~50y) | 1.57 ± 0.19 | 1.45 ± 0.19 | 1.03 ± 0.13 | 0.077 |
| Elderly group(>60y) | 1.72 ± 0.19 | 1.77 ± 0.17 | 1.83 ± 0.18 | 0.902 |
| Kruskal-Wallis H ( | 0.132 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | – |
IA Incisura angularis, Data present as standard error of the mean
The characters of H. pylori associated gastric mucosal inflammation in different age population: The mucosa inflammation is consistent with the severity of H. pylori colonization
| Mucosal inflammation | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| + | 292 | 30 | 322 |
| – | 114 | 104 | 218 |
| Total | 406 | 134 | 540 |
X2 = 102.68, p < 0.001
Fig. 3The association of H. pylori distribution and pyloric metaplasia with increasing age. a Distribution of pylori gland in different sites of stomach in different age groups. *** p < 0.001. b The correlation between the infection rate of H. pylori and the gland type expansion in five sites among three age groups
The correlation between the colonization of H. pylori-associated mucosal inflammation and the gland type expansion
| Mucosal inflammation | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| + | 228 | 94 | 322 |
| – | 56 | 162 | 218 |
| Total | 284 | 256 | 540 |
X2 = 106.14, p < 0.001
Multiple correlation analysis among mucosal inflammation, Hp density, the pyloric gland and age in corpus
| Correlationsa,b,c | Mucosal inflammation | Pyloric gland | Age | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mucosal inflammation | Correlation | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.57 | 0.48 |
| Significance(2-detailed) | – | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Correlation | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 0.50 | |
| Significance(2-detailed) | 0.00 | – | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Pyloric gland | Correlation | 0.57 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 0.33 |
| Significance(2-detailed) | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | 0.00 | |
| Age | Correlation | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.33 | 1.00 |
| Significance(2-detailed) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | – | |
acells contain zero-order (Pearson) correlations, bmucosal inflammation and Hp density were choosen as variables, cpyloric gland and age were set as controlling variables