BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and its associated consequences remain significant public health concerns. Given that AUD represents a spectrum of severity, treatment options represent a continuum of care, ranging from single-session brief interventions to more intensive, prolonged, and specialized treatment modalities. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative literature review seeks to describe the best practices for AUD by placing a particular emphasis on identifying those practices which have received the most empirical support. METHOD: This review summarizes psychological and pharmacological intervention options for AUD treatment, with a focus on the relapse prevention phase of recovery. Psychological and pharmacological treatments are summarized in terms of the empirical evidence favoring each approach and the level of AUD severity for which they are most indicated. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: One of the broad assertions from this review is that while AUD is highly prevalent, seeking treatment for AUD is not. There are a myriad of behavioral and pharmacological treatments that have shown compelling evidence of efficacy for the treatment of AUD. In the behavioral treatment literature, cognitive behavioral therapy has received the most consistent support. Opioid antagonism (via naltrexone) has been the most widely studied pharmacotherapy and has produced moderate effect sizes. While none of the treatments reviewed herein represents a so-called silver bullet for AUD, they each have the potential to significantly improve the odds of recovery. Precision medicine, or the identification of best treatment matches for individual patients, looms as an important overarching goal for the field, although specific matches are not yet sufficiently reliable in their empirical evidence to warrant clinical dissemination.
BACKGROUND:Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and its associated consequences remain significant public health concerns. Given that AUD represents a spectrum of severity, treatment options represent a continuum of care, ranging from single-session brief interventions to more intensive, prolonged, and specialized treatment modalities. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative literature review seeks to describe the best practices for AUD by placing a particular emphasis on identifying those practices which have received the most empirical support. METHOD: This review summarizes psychological and pharmacological intervention options for AUD treatment, with a focus on the relapse prevention phase of recovery. Psychological and pharmacological treatments are summarized in terms of the empirical evidence favoring each approach and the level of AUD severity for which they are most indicated. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: One of the broad assertions from this review is that while AUD is highly prevalent, seeking treatment for AUD is not. There are a myriad of behavioral and pharmacological treatments that have shown compelling evidence of efficacy for the treatment of AUD. In the behavioral treatment literature, cognitive behavioral therapy has received the most consistent support. Opioid antagonism (via naltrexone) has been the most widely studied pharmacotherapy and has produced moderate effect sizes. While none of the treatments reviewed herein represents a so-called silver bullet for AUD, they each have the potential to significantly improve the odds of recovery. Precision medicine, or the identification of best treatment matches for individual patients, looms as an important overarching goal for the field, although specific matches are not yet sufficiently reliable in their empirical evidence to warrant clinical dissemination.
Authors: Bridgette M Bewick; Karen Trusler; Michael Barkham; Andrew J Hill; Jane Cahill; Brendan Mulhern Journal: Prev Med Date: 2008-01-26 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lara A Ray; Spencer Bujarski; Megan M Yardley; Daniel J O Roche; Emily E Hartwell Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Sarah Bowen; Katie Witkiewitz; Seema L Clifasefi; Joel Grow; Neharika Chawla; Sharon H Hsu; Haley A Carroll; Erin Harrop; Susan E Collins; M Kathleen Lustyk; Mary E Larimer Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Brian D Kiluk; Lara A Ray; Justin Walthers; Michael Bernstein; Jeffery S Tonigan; Molly Magill Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Aaron C Lim; Erica N Grodin; Rejoyce Green; Alexandra Venegas; Lindsay R Meredith; Kelly E Courtney; Nathasha R Moallem; Philip Sayegh; Edythe D London; Lara A Ray Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Vanessa A Palzes; Andrea H Kline-Simon; Derek D Satre; Stacy Sterling; Constance Weisner; Felicia W Chi Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Carolina Barbosa; William N Dowd; Arnie P Aldridge; Christine Timko; Gary A Zarkin Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Shari Rogal; Ada Youk; Hongwei Zhang; Walid F Gellad; Michael J Fine; Chester B Good; Maggie Chartier; Andrea DiMartini; Timothy Morgan; Ramon Bataller; Kevin L Kraemer Journal: Hepatology Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: John Kramer; Danielle M Dick; Andrea King; Lara A Ray; Kenneth J Sher; Ashley Vena; Leandro F Vendruscolo; Laura Acion Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 2.826