| Literature DB >> 30373179 |
Marta Erminia Alberto1, Bruna Clara De Simone2, Gloria Mazzone3, Nino Russo4, Marirosa Toscano5.
Abstract
The photophysical properties of a series of nitrated and halogenated phosphorus tritolylcorrole complexes were studied in dichloromethane solvent by using the density functional theory. Particular emphasis was given to the absorption spectra, the energy gap between the excited singlet and triplet states, and the magnitude of the spin-orbit couplings for a series of possible intersystem crossing channels between those excited states. The proposed study provides a better description of the photophysical properties of these systems while giving insights into their possible use as photosensitizers in photodynamic therapy.Entities:
Keywords: density functional theory; heavy atom effect; phosphorus tritolylcorrole; photodynamic therapy; spin-orbit coupling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373179 PMCID: PMC6278441 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23112779
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Schematic representation of compounds investigated in this work.
B3LYP/6-31 + G * vertical excitation energies, ΔE (eV), λ (nm), oscillator strengths f and main transitions (H = HOMO, L = LUMO) for studied compounds, computed in dichloromethane. Experimental values are taken from [13].
| Cmpd. | State | ΔE | λ |
| Transitions | λexp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| S1 | 1.84 | 673 | 0.275 | H→L (93%) | 635 |
| S2 | 2.19 | 566 | 0.161 | H − 1→L (75%) | 590 | |
| S3 | 2.68 | 463 | 0.439 | H→L + 1 (64%) | 447 | |
| S4 | 3.18 | 390 | 0.559 | H − 1→L + 1 (29%), H − 4→L (29%) | 428 | |
| T1 | 1.18 | 1050 | H→L (96%) | |||
| T2 | 1.62 | 766 | H − 1→L (92%) | |||
|
| S1 | 2.22 | 559 | 0.310 | H→L (86%) | 599 |
| S2 | 2.37 | 522 | 0.007 | H − 1→L (54%), H→L + 1 (45%) | 526 | |
| S3 | 3.03 | 405 | 1.112 | H→L + 1 (52%), H − 1→L (44%) | 421 | |
| S4 | 3.18 | 390 | 1.066 | H − 1→L + 1 (82%) | 410 | |
| T1 | 1.41 | 879 | H→L (99%) | |||
| T2 | 1.76 | 705 | H→L + 1 (55%), H − 1→L (43%) | |||
| T3 | 1.96 | 632 | H − 1→L (56%), H→L + 1 (43%) | |||
|
| S1 | 2.24 | 555 | 0.295 | H→L (86%) | 599 |
| S2 | 2.39 | 520 | 0.011 | H − 1→L (56%), H→L + 1 (43%) | 527 | |
| S3 | 3.07 | 404 | 1.176 | H→L + 1 (54%), H − 1→L (41%) | 422 | |
| S4 | 3.21 | 386 | 0.995 | H − 1→L + 1 (83%) | 411 | |
| T1 | 1.40 | 885 | H→L (99%) | |||
| T2 | 1.78 | 697 | H→L + 1 (50%), H − 1→L (48%) | |||
| T3 | 1.97 | 629 | H − 1→L (51%), H→L + 1 (48%) | |||
|
| S1 | 2.22 | 559 | 0.318 | H→L, (86%) | |
| S2 | 2.37 | 522 | 0.008 | H − 1→L (54%), H→L + 1 (45%) | ||
| S3 | 3.04 | 407 | 1.101 | H→L + 1 (51%), H − 1→L (42%) | ||
| S4 | 3.18 | 390 | 1.069 | H − 1→L + 1 (82%) | ||
| T1 | 1.41 | 877 | H→L (99%) | |||
| T2 | 1.76 | 706 | H→L + 1 (54%), H − 1→L (44%) | |||
| T3 | 1.96 | 632 | H − 1→L (56%),H→L + 1 (43%) | |||
|
| S1 | 2.23 | 556 | 0.311 | H→L (86%) | |
| S2 | 2.39 | 519 | 0.014 | H − 1→L (57%), H→L + 1 (42%) | ||
| S3 | 3.05 | 406 | 1.186 | H→L + 1 (53%), H − 1→L (40%) | ||
| S4 | 3.22 | 385 | 1.018 | H − 1→L + 1 (82%) | ||
| T1 | 1.40 | 887 | H→L (99%) | |||
| T2 | 1.78 | 698 | H − 1→L (50%), H→L + 1 (48%) | |||
| T3 | 1.97 | 629 | H→L + 1 (50%), H − 1→L (49%) |
Figure 1Energy diagram of the four Gouterman’s orbital and their counter plot for the ground states of compounds 1–5. H-L energy gaps (eV) are indicated by solid red arrows.
Spin–orbit matrix elements (cm−1) and singlet-triplet energy gaps (eV) calculated at the B3LYP/cc-pVDZ level of theory.
| Cmpd. |
| ΔES1–T1 |
| ΔES1–T2 |
| ΔES1–T3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.48 | 0.66 | 0.35 | 0.22 | ||
|
| 0.28 | 0.81 | 0.67 | 0.46 | 0.32 | 0.26 |
|
| 0.26 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.46 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
|
| 13.10 | 0.81 | 35.0 | 0.46 | 5.4 | 0.26 |
|
| 8.54 | 0.83 | 77.27 | 0.45 | 12.65 | 0.26 |
Figure 2Molecular orbital contour plots for selected excited states of systems 2 and 4.