| Literature DB >> 30373174 |
Md Jahangir Alam1,2, Ryota Takahashi3, Said M Afify4,5, Aung Ko Ko Oo6, Kazuki Kumon7, Hend M Nawara8, Aprilliana Cahya Khayrani9, Juan Du10, Maram H Zahra11, Akimasa Seno12,13, David S Salomon14, Masaharu Seno15,16.
Abstract
Cripto-1 is a glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored signaling protein of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-Cripto-1-FRL1-Cryptic (CFC) family and plays a significant role in the early developmental stages and in the different types of cancer cells, epithelial to mesenchymal transition and tumor angiogenesis. Previously, we have developed cancer stem cells (miPS-LLCcm) from mouse iPSCs by culturing them in the presence of conditioned medium of Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cells for four weeks. Nodal and Cripto-1 were confirmed to be expressed in miPS-LLCcm cells by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (rt-qPCR) implying that Cr-1 was required in maintaining stemness. To investigate the biological effect of adding exogenous soluble CR-1 to the cancer stem cells, we have prepared a C-terminally truncated soluble form of recombinant human CR-1 protein (rhsfCR-1), in which the GPI anchored moiety was removed by substitution of a stop codon through site-directed mutagenesis. rhsfCR-1 effectively suppressed the proliferation and sphere forming ability of miPS-LLCcm cells in a dose-dependent manner in the range of 0 to 5 µg/mL, due to the suppression of Nodal-Cripto-1/ALK4/Smad2 signaling pathway. Frequency of sphere-forming cells was dropped from 1/40 to 1/69 by rhsfCR-1 at 1 µg/mL. Moreover, rhsfCR-1 in the range of 0 to 1 µg/mL also limited the differentiation of miPS-LLCcm cells into vascular endothelial cells probably due to the suppression of self-renewal, which should reduce the number of cells with stemness property. As demonstrated by a soluble form of exogenous Cripto-1 in this study, the efficient blockade would be an attractive way to study Cripto-1 dependent cancer stem cell properties for therapeutic application.Entities:
Keywords: Cripto-1; cancer stem cells; miPS-LLCcm; mouse iPS; recombinant Cripto-1; self-renewal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30373174 PMCID: PMC6274844 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113345
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Expression of mRNA for Cr-1 and related molecules in miPSCs, Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) and miPS-LLCcm cells. rt-qPCR was used to assess the relative expression of Cripto-1, Nodal, ACVR2B, ALK4 and GRP78 in these three cell lines. GAPDH was used as an endogenous control and each vertical bar represents the mean ± SD of three data points. The difference between the relative expression in miPS cells and miPS-LLCcm cells is statistically significant as evaluated by Student t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 2Evaluation of the suppression of growth in miPS-LLCcm cells by rhsfCR-1. (A) miPS-LLCcm cells were treated for 48 h with/without rhsfCR-1 (1 µg/mL) and photographed under adherent condition; (B) miPS-LLCcm viability were assessed by MTT assay after 24 h treatment with different concentrations of rhsfCR-1. Experiments were repeated three times and the data were plotted as the mean ± SD (n = 3); (C) live cells were counted after 24 h treatment with either 0.5 µg/mL and 1 µg/mL rhsfCR-1; (D) rhsfCR-1 did not induce apoptosis of miPS-LLCcm cells. Apoptosis was assessed after 24 h of treatment with rhsfCR-1 by flow cytometry with double staining with PI and APC-Annexin-V; (E) no significant changes in the number of apoptotic cells were found between the treatments with/without rhsfCR-1. Bar plots represent the percentage of apoptotic cells in (D); (F) rhsfCR-1 did not affect on the cell cycle of miPS-LLC cells. Cells treated with/without rhsfCR-1 were stained with PI and analyzed by flow cytometry; (G) confocal observation of immunostaining of miPS-LLCcm cells with anti-Ki-67 antibody together with GFP and DAPI staining; (H) rt-qPCR analysis of p21 expression in miPS-LLCcm cells treated with/without rhsfCR-1; (I) rhsfCR-1 suppressed the growth of the miPS-LLCcm cells during the time course up to 48 h. Live cells were counted after 24 and 48 h treatments with/without rhsfCR-1. Each bar represents mean ± SD from three independent plates. One-way ANOVA with pairwise multiple comparisons (C), Student’s t-test (H) and Two-way ANOVA (I) were used to analyze the level of significance (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 3rhsfCR-1 attenuated the sphere formation ability of miPS-LLCcm cells. (A) The number of spheres were counted after the treatment with various concentrations of rhsfCR-1 for 1 week under non-adherent condition. Student t-test was conducted to analyze the significance (* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001); (B) spheres in non-adherent cultures in serum free miPS medium supplemented with ITS-x. Spheres were photographed after the treatment with/without rhsfCR-1 (1 µg/mL) for 1 week using sphere formation assay; (C) extreme limiting dilution assay assessment of the limiting dilution sphere forming potential showed significantly reduced sphere formation of miPS-LLCcm cells in the presence of rhsfCR-1 at a high cell density per well in 96-well low attachment plates. (See Materials and Methods, Section 4).
Figure 4rhsfCR-1 inhibited Smad2 phosphorylation in miPS-LLCcm cells. (A) Phosphorylation of Smad2 in miPS-LLCcm cells was assessed by Western Blotting treated with 1 µg/mL rhsfCR-1 for 5 and 15 min in the absence serum. Beta-actin was used as a control. The representative blot was shown; (B) the relative intensity of Smad2 phosphorylation bands normalized by each band of Smad2 in Western Blots from three different experiments was densitometrically analyzed using ImageJ software.
Figure 5rhsfCR-1 suppressed differentiation into endothelial cells using CD31+ phenotype and tube formation by miPS-LLCcm cells. (A) Relative expression of CD31 in miPS-LLCcm cells was analyzed by rt-qPCR analysis. The expression level of GAPDH was used as endogenous control. Each plot represents mean ± SD of three data points. One-way ANOVA with pairwise multiple comparison (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001); (B) Western blotting analysis showed the reduction of CD31 protein. Beta-actin was used as a control; (C) CD31 detected by immunofluorescence (Red) in miPS-LLCcm cells under adherent conditions. CD31 stained with anti-rabbit CD31. The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue); (D) ratio of CD31-positive cells over GFP-positive cells in the absence and presence of rhsfCR-1. Student t-test was used to analyze the significance (* p < 0.05) (E) tube formation by miPS-LLCcm cells assessed in the absence or presence of rhsfCR-1 (1 µg/mL).
Figure 6Evaluation of the expression of the stemness markers, Nanog, Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc, in miPS-LLCcm cells in adherent culture (A) after 24 h of treatment with rhsfCR-1 and in spheres under non-adherent condition (B) of miPS-LLCcm cells treated with rhsfCR-1 by rt-qPCR. GAPDH was used as endogenous control and each bar represent mean ± SD of three data points. Two-way ANOVA (A) with multiple comparison and Student’s t-test (B) were conducted to analysis the level of significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant).
Figure 7rhsfCR-1 suppressed migration and invasion in miPS-LLCcm cells. (A) Wound healing potential was assessed after the treatment without or with rhsfCR-1 (1 µg/mL) for 24 and 48 h; (B) invasion ability was assessed with using Matrigel-coated inserts. Invasive cells were stained with Giemsa; (C) the graph indicates the results of quantitative analysis of invasive cells stained with Giemsa. The number of stained cells was counted from several different (six) fields. The data were analyzed using two- tailed Student’s t-test and are presented as the mean ± SD. *** p < 0.001.