Literature DB >> 3037195

Lung cancer classification: the relationship of disease extent and cell type to survival in a clinical trials population.

C F Mountain, J M Lukeman, S P Hammar, D W Chamberlain, W F Coulson, D L Page, T A Victor, L H Weiland.   

Abstract

The staging and histologic cell type of patients in the Lung Cancer Study Group (LCSG) clinical trials program are reviewed and confirmed or resolved at the reference center for anatomic and pathologic classification of lung cancer. A high level of consistency in classification has been achieved through the use of criteria that minimize intraobserver variability. The data obtained from the review project have been used to characterize the relationship of disease extent and cell type to survival in the clinical trials population. Survival characteristics were generated for 1,121 patients who underwent apparent complete resection of nonsmall cell lung cancer and were subsequently entered into various protocols to receive either adjuvant treatment or no further therapy. The end results study provides some insight regarding the biological behavior of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung in terms of the anatomic extent of disease at the time of apparent complete resection. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma had an outcome superior to that of patients with adenocarcinoma in every TNM subset. The differences in survival according to these major cell types were significant overall and in the T1 N0, T1 N1, and T2 N1 subsets but not in the TNM subsets in stage III disease. Histologic cell type and extent of disease are important factors in survival expectations; thus the accuracy and reproducibility of these classifications plays a significant role in the evaluation of differing modalities of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3037195     DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930350302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  23 in total

1.  The practice of cardiothoracic surgeons in the perioperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  G M Tsang; D C Watson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  New prognostic factors in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E F Smit; H J Groen; T A Splinter; T Ebels; P E Postmus
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Dysphagia due to mesothelioma infiltrating the oesophagus: palliative treatment.

Authors:  C A Lockwood; H W Jones; C K Foote; M J Turner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Postoperative chemotherapy for resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Crump
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in the management of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M T Jaklitsch; G M Strauss; D J Sugarbaker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Invasive staging of the mediastinum.

Authors:  M R Johnston
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of T1 lung cancer in high-risk patients.

Authors:  H A Shennib; R Landreneau; D S Mulder; M Mack
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Smoking behavior following diagnosis in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E R Gritz; R Nisenbaum; R E Elashoff; E C Holmes
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Survival after surgery in stage IA and IB non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David Ost; Judith Goldberg; Linda Rolnitzky; William N Rom
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 10.  Lung cancer: a review of current therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  A B Sandler; A C Buzaid
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.