Literature DB >> 30371009

Systems biology of robustness and homeostatic mechanisms.

H Frederik Nijhout1, Janet A Best2, Michael C Reed3.   

Abstract

All organisms are subject to large amounts of genetic and environmental variation and have evolved mechanisms that allow them to function well in spite of these challenges. This property is generally referred to as robustness. We start with the premise that phenotypes arise from dynamical systems and are therefore system properties. Phenotypes occur at all levels of the biological organizational hierarchy, from gene products, to biochemical pathways, to cells, tissues, organs, appendages, and whole bodies. Phenotypes at all these levels are subject to environmental and genetic challenges against which their form and function need to be protected. The mechanisms that can produce robustness are diverse and several different kinds often operate simultaneously. We focus, in particular, on homeostatic mechanisms that dynamically maintain form and function against varying environmental and genetic factors. Understanding how homeostatic mechanisms operate, how they reach their set point, and the nature of the set point pose difficult challenges. In developmental systems, homeostatic mechanisms make the progression of morphogenesis relatively insensitive to genetic and environmental variation so that the outcomes vary little, even in the presence of severe mutational and environmental stress. Accordingly, developmental systems give the appearance of being goal-oriented, but how the target phenotype is encoded is not known. We discuss why and how individual variation poses challenges for mathematical modeling of biological systems, and conclude with an explanation of how system population models are a useful method for incorporating individual variation into deterministic ordinary differential equation (ODE) models. This article is categorized under: Models of Systems Properties and Processes > Mechanistic Models Physiology > Mammalian Physiology in Health and Disease Physiology > Organismal Responses to Environment Biological Mechanisms > Regulatory Biology.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allosteric regulation; cryptic genetic variation; homeostasis; metabolism; robustness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30371009     DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med        ISSN: 1939-005X


  9 in total

1.  Infinitesimal homeostasis in three-node input-output networks.

Authors:  Martin Golubitsky; Yangyang Wang
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Senecavirus A Enhances Its Adaptive Evolution via Synonymous Codon Bias Evolution.

Authors:  Simiao Zhao; Huiqi Cui; Zhenru Hu; Li Du; Xuhua Ran; Xiaobo Wen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.818

3.  Principles of Endocrine Regulation: Reconciling Tensions Between Robustness in Performance and Adaptation to Change.

Authors:  Rudolf Hoermann; Mark J Pekker; John E M Midgley; Rolf Larisch; Johannes W Dietrich
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 4.  A Dynamical Paradigm for Molecular Cell Biology.

Authors:  John J Tyson; Bela Novak
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 5.  Towards organism-level systems biology by next-generation genetics and whole-organ cell profiling.

Authors:  Yoichi Minami; Yufei Yuan; Hiroki R Ueda
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-11-18

6.  Resolving the Rules of Robustness and Resilience in Biology Across Scales.

Authors:  Erica Crespi; Robert Burnap; Jing Chen; Moumita Das; Natalie Gassman; Epaminondas Rosa; Rebecca Simmons; Haruka Wada; Zhen Q Wang; Jie Xiao; Bing Yang; John Yin; Jared V Goldstone
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.392

7.  DOPA Homeostasis by Dopamine: A Control-Theoretic View.

Authors:  Rune Kleppe; Qaiser Waheed; Peter Ruoff
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Energy Cost of Dynamical Stabilization: Stored versus Dissipated Energy.

Authors:  Armen E Allahverdyan; Edvard A Khalafyan
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  Intermediate progenitors support migration of neural stem cells into dentate gyrus outer neurogenic niches.

Authors:  Branden R Nelson; Rebecca D Hodge; Ray Am Daza; Prem Prakash Tripathi; Sebastian J Arnold; Kathleen J Millen; Robert F Hevner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.