N Bhojani1, D-D Nguyen2, R P Kaufman3, D Elterman4, K C Zorn5. 1. Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada. naeem.bhojani@gmail.com. 2. Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 3. Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA. 4. Department of Urology, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 5. Division of Urology, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Surgical options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) become limited when treating large prostates due to steep learning curves and less effective treatment. Aquablation (AquaBeam System, PROCEPT BioRobotics, Inc., USA) could remedy this. We compare the effectiveness of Aquablation in large prostates between 80 cc and 100 cc and very large prostates > 100 cc. METHODS: WATER II (NCT03123250) is a prospective, multicenter, international clinical trial of Aquablation for the surgical treatment of LUTS/BPH in men of age 45-80 years with prostates between 80 cc and 150 cc. Aquablation was performed using the AquaBeam System. The reported analysis compares the subgroup of patients with a baseline prostate size of < 100 cc versus those with a prostate size of > 100 cc. Students' t test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's test for ordinal/binary variables. RESULTS: Of 114 screened patients, 101 meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled at 13 US and 3 Canadian sites between September and December 2017. Mean operative time was 31.2 ± 8 min in the < 100 cc subgroup and 41.7 ± 14.9 min in the > 100 cc subgroup. The average length of stay following the procedure for the < 100 cc subgroup was 1.5 ± 0.7 days versus 1.7 ± 1.1 days for the > 100 cc subgroup. Mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life, and IPSS voiding and storage subscores were substantial, occurring soon after treatment and averaging (at 3 months) 16.5, 2.8, 10.6, and 5.8 points, respectively (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Aquablation clinically normalizes outcomes between patients of the < 100 cc and > 100 cc prostate cohorts. It is safe and effective in patients with large prostate glands (> 100 cc) with a smoother learning curve.
INTRODUCTION: Surgical options for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) become limited when treating large prostates due to steep learning curves and less effective treatment. Aquablation (AquaBeam System, PROCEPT BioRobotics, Inc., USA) could remedy this. We compare the effectiveness of Aquablation in large prostates between 80 cc and 100 cc and very large prostates > 100 cc. METHODS:WATER II (NCT03123250) is a prospective, multicenter, international clinical trial of Aquablation for the surgical treatment of LUTS/BPH in men of age 45-80 years with prostates between 80 cc and 150 cc. Aquablation was performed using the AquaBeam System. The reported analysis compares the subgroup of patients with a baseline prostate size of < 100 cc versus those with a prostate size of > 100 cc. Students' t test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's test for ordinal/binary variables. RESULTS: Of 114 screened patients, 101 meeting eligibility criteria were enrolled at 13 US and 3 Canadian sites between September and December 2017. Mean operative time was 31.2 ± 8 min in the < 100 cc subgroup and 41.7 ± 14.9 min in the > 100 cc subgroup. The average length of stay following the procedure for the < 100 cc subgroup was 1.5 ± 0.7 days versus 1.7 ± 1.1 days for the > 100 cc subgroup. Mean changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life, and IPSS voiding and storage subscores were substantial, occurring soon after treatment and averaging (at 3 months) 16.5, 2.8, 10.6, and 5.8 points, respectively (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Aquablation clinically normalizes outcomes between patients of the < 100 cc and > 100 cc prostate cohorts. It is safe and effective in patients with large prostate glands (> 100 cc) with a smoother learning curve.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aquablation; Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Large prostate
Authors: Giancarlo Marra; Paul Sturch; Marco Oderda; Shahin Tabatabaei; Gordon Muir; Paolo Gontero Journal: Int J Urol Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 3.369
Authors: Kevin T McVary; Claus G Roehrborn; Andrew L Avins; Michael J Barry; Reginald C Bruskewitz; Robert F Donnell; Harris E Foster; Chris M Gonzalez; Steven A Kaplan; David F Penson; James C Ulchaker; John T Wei Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Raymond C Rosen; Joseph Catania; Lance Pollack; Stanley Althof; Michael O'Leary; Allen D Seftel Journal: Urology Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Christian Gratzke; Alexander Bachmann; Aurelien Descazeaud; Marcus J Drake; Stephan Madersbacher; Charalampos Mamoulakis; Matthias Oelke; Kari A O Tikkinen; Stavros Gravas Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-01-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: David-Dan Nguyen; Vincent Misraï; Thorsten Bach; Naeem Bhojani; James E Lingeman; Dean S Elterman; Kevin C Zorn Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Iman Sadri; Adel Arezki; Félix Couture; David-Dan Nguyen; Russell Schwartz; Ahmed S Zakaria; Dean Elterman; Enrique Rijo; Vincent Misrai; Thorsten Bach; Claus G Roehrborn; Kevin C Zorn Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: David-Dan Nguyen; Neil Barber; Mo Bidair; Peter Gilling; Paul Anderson; Kevin C Zorn; Gopal Badlani; Mitch Humphreys; Steven Kaplan; Ronald Kaufman; Alan So; Ryan Paterson; Larry Goldenberg; Dean Elterman; Mihir Desai; Jim Lingeman; Claus Roehrborn; Naeem Bhojani Journal: BJU Int Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Dean Elterman; Thorsten Bach; Enrique Rijo; Vincent Misrai; Paul Anderson; Kevin C Zorn; Naeem Bhojani; Albert El Hajj; Bilal Chughtai; Mihir Desai Journal: BJU Int Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: David-Dan Nguyen; Neil Barber; Mo Bidair; Peter Gilling; Paul Anderson; Kevin C Zorn; Gopal Badlani; Mitch Humphreys; Steven Kaplan; Ronald Kaufman; Alan So; Ryan Paterson; Larry Goldenberg; Dean Elterman; Mihir Desai; Jim Lingeman; Claus Roehrborn; Naeem Bhojani Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2021-01-31