| Literature DB >> 30370272 |
Sigal Gelkop1, Ariel Sobarzo1, Polina Brangel2, Cécile Vincke3, Ema Romão3, Shlomit Fedida-Metula1, Nick Strom4, Irene Ataliba5, Frank Norbet Mwiine6, Sylvester Ochwo6, Lauro Velazquez-Salinas7, Rachel A McKendry2, Serge Muyldermans3, Julius Julian Lutwama5, Elizabeth Rieder7, Victoria Yavelsky1, Leslie Lobel1,5.
Abstract
Effective management of foot and mouth disease (FMD) requires diagnostic tests to distinguish between infected and vaccinated animals (DIVA). To address this need, several enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) platforms have been developed, however, these tests vary in their sensitivity and specificity and are very expensive for developing countries. Camelid-derived single-domain antibodies fragments so-called Nanobodies, have demonstrated great efficacy for the development of serological diagnostics. This study describes the development of a novel Nanobody-based FMD 3ABC competitive ELISA, for the serological detection of antibodies against FMD Non-Structural Proteins (NSP) in Uganda cattle herds. This in-house ELISA was validated using more than 600 sera from different Uganda districts, and virus serotype specificities. The evaluation of the performance of the assay demonstrated high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 94 % (95 % CI: 88.9-97.2), and 97.67 % (95 % CI: 94.15-99.36) respectively, as well as the capability to detect NSP-specific antibodies against multiple FMD serotype infections. In comparison with the commercial PrioCHECK FMDV NSP-FMD test, there was a strong concordance and high correlation and agreement in the performance of the two tests. This new developed Nanobody based FMD 3ABC competitive ELISA could clearly benefit routine disease diagnosis, the establishment of disease-free zones, and the improvement of FMD management and control in endemically complex environments, such as those found in Africa.Entities:
Keywords: ELISA; antibodies; foot and mouth disease; nanobodies; non-structural proteins
Year: 2018 PMID: 30370272 PMCID: PMC6194346 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Sera sample bank.
| Naïve | 72 | Israel | 2017 |
| Vaccinated | 144 | 2017 | |
| Non-infected | 100 | Uganda | |
| FMD Infected | 150 | ||
| “O” strain | 50 | 2014–2015 | |
| “SAT1” strain | 50 | ||
| “SAT2” strain | 50 | ||
| Randomly field collected | 165 | 2016–2017 | |
| Total | 631 |
Figure 1Selection of Nanobodies (Nbs) from an immune phage-displayed Nb library against FMDV 3ABC protein. Periplasmic Extract (PE) ELISA results demonstrating 19 Nb colonies analyzed for the immunorecognition to FMDV 3ABC protein and peptides (3A, 3B, 3C1, and 3C2). Luria-Bertani (LB) broth medium was used as negative control. Assay cutoff is indicated by dash line.
Figure 2Binding affinity analysis of selected Nanobodies (Nbs) against FMDV 3ABC protein. (A) The binding affinity results of six anti-FMDV 3ABC Nbs, evaluated by indirect ELISA. During experiments Nb9 was used as a negative control. The results are presented in Relative Light Units (RLU). (B). The immunorecognition performance of six selected anti-FMDV 3ABC Nbs in a competitive ELISA format using a set of 8 infected and noninfected control samples. Mean percentage of inhibition (PI) for each Nb was calculated using the formula: 100–(X Aver infected/X Aver noninfected) × 100.
Figure 3Diagnostics performance of the Nanobody (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA. (A) Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis results from a total of 222 cattle sera. Dotted lines represent 95 % confidence interval. (B). Lower limit of detection (LLD) using positive (infected sera) and negative (noninfected sera) control serum. Cutoff assay is indicated by dash line. (C) Intra assay repeatability performance was assessed using a set of positive and negative internal control sera tested in the assays in different days and by different operators. Lower and upper limits (2 × STDV) are indicated by dot lines. Cutoff assay is indicated by dash line. The total average and STDV of positive and negative internal control sera across the different experiments is also presented. Statistical analysis: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Performance of Nanobody (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA in comparison to FMDV PrioCHECK NSP test.
| Naïve | 72 | 0/72 (0 %) | 72/72 (100 %) | 2/72 (3 %) | 72/72 (97 %) | 97 % |
| Non-infected | 100 | 4/100 (4 %) | 96/100 (96 %) | 3/100 (3 %) | 97/100 (97 %) | 99 % |
| FMD Infected | 150 | 141/150 (94 %) | 9/150 (6 %) | 148/150 (98 %) | 2/150 (2 %) | 95 % |
| “O” strain | 50 | 49/50 (98 %) | 1/50 (2 %) | 50/50 (100 %) | 0/50 (0 %) | 99 % |
| “SAT1” strain | 50 | 48/50 (96 %) | 2/50 (4 %) | 49/50 (98 %) | 1/50 (2 %) | 99 % |
| “SAT2” strain | 50 | 42/50 (84 %) | 8/50 (16 %) | 49/50 (98 %) | 1/50 (2 %) | 88 % |
| Vaccinated | 144 | 6/144 (4 %) | 138/144 (96 %) | 12/144 (8 %) | 132/144 (92 %) | 96 % |
| 1st vaccination | 72 | 1/72 (1 %) | 71/72 (99 %) | 0/72 (0 %) | 72/72 (100 %) | 99 % |
| 2nd vaccination | 72 | 5/72 (7 %) | 67/72 (93 %) | 12/72 (17 %) | 60/72 (83 %) | 90 % |
| Total | 466 | |||||
Figure 4Sera screening analysis of infected and noninfected cattle samples using the Nanobody (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA. Box plot representing 100 noninfected (negative) and 150 infected (confirmed by reverse transcription PCR or virus isolation) (positive) sera collected in Uganda. FMDV serotype of infected cattle, included serotype O, SAT1 and SAT2 (50 samples for each). Cutoff assay is indicated by dash line. Numbers in brackets indicate the total number of tested sera.
Figure 5Sera screening analysis of naïve and vaccinated calves' samples using the Nanobody (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA and PrioCHECK NSP test. A total of 72 calves were serially sampled three times; before first vaccination (naïve state), after first vaccination, and after second vaccination. The prevalence of FMDV NSP antibodies were determined by the Nb (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA (A) and PrioCHECK NSP test (B). Cutoff for each assay is indicated by dash line.
Figure 6Comparison analysis of serum samples tested by the Nanobody (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA. Serum collected from cattle with different FMD status were analyzed for NSP antibodies presence by the Nb (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA. These included free (naïve and noninfected), infected (FMDV serotype O, SAT1 and SAT2) and vaccinated (first and second vaccination). The mean results of percentage of inhibition (PI) is presented. Cutoff assay is indicated by dash line. Statistical analysis: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Sera screening analysis, of randomly collected field samples, tested by the Nanobody (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA and FMDV PrioCHECK NSP test.
| Nakasake | 80 | 21/80 (26 %) | 59/80 (74 %) | 20/80 (25 %) | 60/80 (75 %) | 99 % |
| Mable | 65 | 9/65 (14 %) | 56/65 (86 %) | 15/65 (23 %) | 50/65 (77 %) | 90 % |
| Isingiro | 13 | 4/13 (30 %) | 9/13 (70 %) | 5/13 (38 %) | 8/13 (62 %) | 92 % |
| Gomba | 7 | 0/7 (0 %) | 7/7 (100 %) | 0/7 (0 %) | 7/7 (100 %) | 100 % |
| Total | 165 | 34/165 (20 %) | 131/165 (80 %) | 40/165 (24 %) | 125/165 (76 %) | 96 % |
Figure 7Sera screening of randomly collected field samples tested by the Nanobody (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA. A total of 165 cattle serums previously collected from four different districts (Mbale, Nakasake, Insingiro, and Gomba) in Uganda, by the Uganda Virus Research Institute (UVRI), were obtained and analyzed using the Nb (Nb94) based 3ABC competitive ELISA. Samples were collected as part of an FMD surveillance program for assessing the levels of NSP antibodies prevalence in the country. Cutoff assay is indicated by dash line. Numbers in brackets indicate the total number of sera tested in each district.