Literature DB >> 30369586

A case of Anthrax in two captive pumas (Puma concolor).

Gorkem Ekebas1, Ayhan Atasever1, Duygu Yaman Gram1, Emre Karakaya2, Secil Abay2, Fuat Aydin2, Kadir Semih Gumussoy2, Mitat Sahin3.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to report anthrax cases in two pumas, brought to the Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University for suspected poisoning upon their sudden death at the Kayseri Zoo, in Turkey. In the necropsy, enlargement and malacia were observed in the spleens. The cut surfaces of the spleens were in extreme red-blackish color. Bacillus anthracis was isolated as a pure culture from both samples which belong to dead pumas. B. anthracis isolates had pXO1 and pXO2 plasmids. Both isolates were found to be sensitive to eight antibacterials tested. This study demonstrates that feeding of the wild carnivorous kept in any zoo with the appropriate meats which belongs to healthy animals is extremely important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthrax; Bacillus anthracis; histopathology; puma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30369586      PMCID: PMC6305515          DOI: 10.1292/jvms.18-0262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med Sci        ISSN: 0916-7250            Impact factor:   1.267


Anthrax, which is a significant zoonosis threatening the life of humans and domestic and wild herbivore and carnivore animals, is caused by Bacillus anthracis that is a spore forming bacterium which quite resistant to environmental conditions [5, 7]. Anthrax cases have been reported in many animal species in natural parks and zoos in the various locations of the world [12, 13, 15, 17, 19]. The disease occurs in wild animals mostly by the consumption of food and water contaminated with B. anthracis. However, the sporulation of B. anthracis and resistance of these spores to pH, high and low temperatures and chemical substances enables it to stay in the soil for a long time. Therefore, it is very important to understand the ecology of Anthrax and the geographical distribution of B. anthracis [5, 6, 27, 28]. While the lesions differ in lions and leopards among predatory animals, head and neck regions are edematous, and edema and hemorrhage are seen in the lymph nodes through these regions [27]. Except observing anthrax bacilli among tissue and erythrocyte clusters microscopically, necrosis and edema are seen in all organs [27]. While anthrax is observed sporadically in the mid and northern regions of Europe nowadays, it has been reported more frequently in Mediterranean countries, particularly Turkey, Greece, Balkan States, Italy and Spain [21,22,23]. There have been studies which reports anthrax cases seen especially in the eastern part of Turkey. In these studies, it was reported that B. anthracis was isolated from cattle, sheep and human [1, 22]. Although cultural examination is considered as the golden standard for the diagnosis of anthrax, Giemsa (capsule), Gram staining (cell wall) and lysis test by gamma phage are required for final definition. In addition, virulent isolates of B. anthracis have pXO1 and pXO2 genes which are encoded on plasmids, and PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) method revealing the presence of these virulence genes provides the confirmation and rapid identification of B. anthracis isolates [2]. Nucleotide array is significant for family typing and molecular epidemiological studies [27]. In this case, we aimed to report macroscopic−microscopic and bacteriological findings of anthrax case found in two pumas which were brought to the Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University for suspected food poisoning upon their death. The materials of this study were two pumas, both were 5-year-old, of which one was male (Puma 1) and one was pregnant female (Puma 2), brought from Kayseri Zoo to the Pathology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Erciyes University for necropsy and suspected poisoning upon their death. The zoo officials reported that the pumas were shared the same cage and fed with the same food. They also reported that the pumas did not show any clinical symptoms before they died. Additionally, no outstanding symptom was observed during the external inspection during necropsy. After the systemic necropsy examination, the tissues were fixed in 10% neutral formalin solution, routine procedure was followed and immersed in paraffin. The tissues were cut in 4–5 µ and examined under light microscope by following Hematoxylin-Eosin and Gram staining [18] procedures. After the necropsy, swab samples were taken from the liver and spleen, and were stained with Giemsa. Also, swab samples were inoculated onto Blood Agar (Blood Agar Base No. 2, Oxoid) containing 7% sheep blood, and plates were incubated for 24 hr at 37°C under aerobic condition. PCR which has been reported by Buyuk et al. [9] with minor modifications was used for detecting the presence of pXO1 and pXO2 in B. anthracis isolates. Amplified products were resolved by 1.5% agarose (Prona) gel electrophoresis and visualized under a UV transilluminator (G:BOX Chemi XRQ, Syngene). A table containing a list of the primers [4] used for this purpose is provided below (Table 1).
Table 1.

A table containing a list of the primers used for this purpose is provided below

Plasmid targetSize (bp)Sequence 5′-3′PrimerReference
pXO1596TACTGACGAGGAGCAACCGACAP6Beyer et al. 1995 [4]
GGCTCAGTGTAACTCCTAATCAP103
pXO21,035GAGGTAGAAGGATATACGGTPA8
TCCTAACACTAACGAAGTCGPA5
Bacillus anthracis K125 isolate (pXO1 and pXO2, from the culture collection of Dept. of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University) was used throughout the study. DNA extraction from Bacillus anthracis isolates was carried out according to the method reported [9]. In addition, antibiotic susceptibility testing of the isolates obtained was performed by using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [14]. The following antibiotic discs were used: penicillin (10 U, Oxoid), amoxycillin 20 µg/clavulanic acid 30 µg, (Oxoid), gentamicine (10 µg, Oxoid), ampicillin (10 µg, Oxoid), tetracycline (30 µg, Oxoid), erythromycin (15 µg, Oxoid), enrofloxacin (5 µg, Oxoid), levofloxacin (5 µg, Oxoid) and ciprofloxacin (5 µg, Bioanalyze). No pathological lesion was found in the external inspection during necropsy while enlargement and malacia were observed in the spleens of two pumas during internal inspection, and the section surfaces were in extreme red-blackish color (Fig. 1A). Enlargement of retropharyngeal lymph nodes associated with edema and accumulated gelatinous fluid (Fig. 1B and 1C) and petechias on submandibular region were seen (Fig. 1D). Similarly, 1 × 1.5 cm foci in gray-whitish color with subserosal location in liver (Fig. 2A) were also observed in the myocard. Myocardium was in dull color with loose consistency (Fig. 2B). The brain and kidneys were hyperemic in appearance (Fig. 2C and 2D). No remarkable pathological lesion was found in the necropsy of two fetuses removed from the uterus.
Fig. 1.

A. Appereance of growth and malacia were observed in the spleen of Puma 1. B–C. Appereance of growth, hemorrhage and edema on retropharyngeal lymph nodes as well as accumulated gelatinous fluid in Puma 2. D. Appereance of petechias on submandibular region in Puma 1.

Fig. 2.

A. Appearance of gray-whitish color with subserosal location in liver of Puma 1. B. Appearance of myocardium was in dull color with loose consistency in Puma 1. C–D. Kidneys and brain were in hyperemic appearance in Puma 2.

A. Appereance of growth and malacia were observed in the spleen of Puma 1. B–C. Appereance of growth, hemorrhage and edema on retropharyngeal lymph nodes as well as accumulated gelatinous fluid in Puma 2. D. Appereance of petechias on submandibular region in Puma 1. A. Appearance of gray-whitish color with subserosal location in liver of Puma 1. B. Appearance of myocardium was in dull color with loose consistency in Puma 1. C–D. Kidneys and brain were in hyperemic appearance in Puma 2. In the microscopic examination, intact and fragmented erythrocytes were found in cortex and medullary sinuses of the spleen as well as hemorrhagic splenitis with lymphocytosis (Fig. 3A). Hemorrhagic lymphadenitis was found in the lymph nodes. There were congestion and perivascular cell infiltration in the liver (Fig. 3B), focal hyalinized glomerules in the kidneys, wide edema, hemorrhage and emphysema areas in the lungs (Fig. 3C), hemorrhagic esophagitis with extensive bleeding in the esophagus (Fig. 3D), vasculitis in the pancreas, and hyperemic and small bleeding areas in the intestinal mucosa. Lymphoplasmatic enteritis (Fig. 3E) and focal non-suppurative myocarditis with degenerative-necrotic areas in myocardium and severe hyperemia were seen in brain vessels (Fig. 3F). B. anthracis was observed within the vessels in all organs associated by septicemia with gram staining (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3.

A. Appearance of hemorrhagic splenitis with lymphocytosis in Puma 1, HxE, × 200. B. Appearance of congestion and perivascular cell infiltration in the liver of Puma 1, HxE, × 200. C. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in the lung with intra-alveolar edema and hemorrhage in Puma 1, HxE, × 200. D. Appearance of hemorrhagic esophagitis with extensive bleeding area in Puma 2, HxE, × 100. E. Appearance of B. anthracis in the lamina muscularis mucosae in the intestine in Puma 1, HxE, × 100. F. Hyperemia in brain vessels in Puma 2, HxE, × 200.

Fig. 4.

A. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in the lung in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. B. B. anthracis in the Lamina propria of intestinal mucosae in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. C. Appearance of B. anthracis in brain vessels in Puma 2, Gram staining, × 100. D. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in kidney of glomerulus in Puma 2, Gram staining, × 200. E. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in spleen in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. F. Appearance of B. anthracis in hepatic sinusoids in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. G. Appearance of B. anthracis in the esophagus in Puma 2, Gram staining, × 200. H. Appearance of B. anthracis between the pancreatic acinus in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200.

A. Appearance of hemorrhagic splenitis with lymphocytosis in Puma 1, HxE, × 200. B. Appearance of congestion and perivascular cell infiltration in the liver of Puma 1, HxE, × 200. C. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in the lung with intra-alveolar edema and hemorrhage in Puma 1, HxE, × 200. D. Appearance of hemorrhagic esophagitis with extensive bleeding area in Puma 2, HxE, × 100. E. Appearance of B. anthracis in the lamina muscularis mucosae in the intestine in Puma 1, HxE, × 100. F. Hyperemia in brain vessels in Puma 2, HxE, × 200. A. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in the lung in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. B. B. anthracis in the Lamina propria of intestinal mucosae in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. C. Appearance of B. anthracis in brain vessels in Puma 2, Gram staining, × 100. D. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in kidney of glomerulus in Puma 2, Gram staining, × 200. E. Vegetative form of B. anthracis in spleen in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. F. Appearance of B. anthracis in hepatic sinusoids in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. G. Appearance of B. anthracis in the esophagus in Puma 2, Gram staining, × 200. H. Appearance of B. anthracis between the pancreatic acinus in Puma 1, Gram staining, × 200. Rough and non-hemolytic colonies, which are specific to B. anthracis, were observed on the blood agar plates. The isolates were purified by streaking on blood agar and were then examined using the following tests; Gram staining, oxidase test, catalase test, motility test and lysis by gamma phage [25]. Encapsulated bacilli, specific for B. anthracis were observed in Giemsa staining slides prepared from the liver and spleen. The result of gamma phage susceptibility testing was positive. The isolates were identified as B. anthracis in the result of cultural examinations. In the molecular analysis, pXO1 and pXO2 plasmids were detected in B. anthracis isolates obtained from both pumas (Fig. 5). B. anthracis isolates were found to be susceptible to all antibiotics tested.
Fig. 5.

pXO2 and pXO1 specific PCR results. A) M: Marker Mid Range DNA Ladder100 bp to 3 kb, Jena Bioscience, P1, P2: Puma 1 and Puma 2. B. anthracis isolates (1,035 bp), PK: Positive control (B. anthracis K125 isolate (pXO2), NK: Negative control. B) M: Marker 100 bp DNA Ladder 100 bp to 1 kb, Jena Bioscience, P1, P2: Puma 1 and Puma 2, B. anthracis isolates (596 bp), PK: Positive control (B. anthracis K125 isolate (pXO1), NK: Negative control.

pXO2 and pXO1 specific PCR results. A) M: Marker Mid Range DNA Ladder100 bp to 3 kb, Jena Bioscience, P1, P2: Puma 1 and Puma 2. B. anthracis isolates (1,035 bp), PK: Positive control (B. anthracis K125 isolate (pXO2), NK: Negative control. B) M: Marker 100 bp DNA Ladder 100 bp to 1 kb, Jena Bioscience, P1, P2: Puma 1 and Puma 2, B. anthracis isolates (596 bp), PK: Positive control (B. anthracis K125 isolate (pXO1), NK: Negative control. Although just one anthrax case which has been confirmed by both histopathological and PCR methods in a puma was reported in Turkey [11], this is the first report of anthrax case in pumas diagnosed by cultural and histopathological examination. In addition, recovered isolates were confirmed by molecular analysis (PCR) and tested for their antibacterial susceptibility. In many natural parks and zoos across the world, anthrax disease has been reported for various carnivore animals such as cheetah, puma, leopard, lion, jaguar, tiger, fox, weasel and wolf [13, 28]. Carcass and rendering products of dead animals due to anthrax plays an important role as a source of infection [5, 6, 27, 28]. Although human anthrax has three forms called as cutaneous, gastrointestinal and inhalational, septicemia occurs frequently in animals [8, 20, 24, 27]. The most prominent findings in our case were limited with intestines and lung, while encapsulated bacteria associated with septicemia were observed in multiple organs. Edema and hemorrhage observed in the ligament in pharynx region indicates that B. anthracis was taken through gastrointestinal tract, and it makes us think that the transmission has occurred from infected animal carcasses to the pumas during feeding, and this supports other study results [5, 27, 29]. In animals affected by anthrax in natural parks and zoos, the clinical symptoms such as exhaustion, respiratory distress, and difficulty in eating and drinking were reported in a limited number of studies [13, 15, 27]. In our case, in addition to the similar clinical findings reported for pumas, it was particularly stated in the anamnesis that these animals did not participate in the feeding session before their death. While the necropsy findings of the affected animals were similar to those reported by researchers [12, 13, 15, 17, 19, 27] which were splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, edema and congestion accompanying to necrosis in axillary-inguinal-mesenterial lymph nodes, lungs, mediastinum, meninges-brain and gastrointestinal system, efussion in pleural and pericardial serosa, epicardial hemorrhage, peritesticular and periovarium bleedings, they were different than necrosis on liver and heart, and bleeding focuses similar to petechia in the esophagus. In the experimental studies for the pathogenesis of anthrax [10, 16, 20, 29], and microscopic findings of the tissues taken from animals died of anthrax in natural parks and zoos [13, 15, 19, 27] showed that there were lymphocytosis in the spleen; edema as well as necrosis in axillary, inguinal and mesenterial lymph nodes and subcapsular sinuses; extension of the alveoles in lungs as a result of fibrin accumulation, macrophage and neutrophil infiltration; demyelination in cerebellum, gliosis, hyperemia and vasculitis in the vessels, neutrophil infiltration and meningitis; neutrophil infiltration with lowered severity compared to other organs in addition to hemorrhagic areas in the interstitial tissue in kidneys; and diffuse congestion in liver, hyperemia and neutrophil infiltration in portal intervals and vena centralis. In our case, lymph nodes were consistent with the findings of lungs, liver and kidneys, and unlike other researchers, there were lesions in the esophagus, but no information was obtained in the literature for these tissues. Especially fibrino-necrotic haemorrhagic esophagitis suggests that the agent was taken orally. B. anthracis have pXO1 and pXO2 plasmids which encode lef, cya, pag, and cap virulence genes respectively and these plasmids have been used in the molecular analysis for diagnosis of anthrax by some authors [3, 26]. In our study, the laboratory diagnosis of B. anthracis was established by both phenotypic and molecular tests (PCR specific to pXO1 and pXO2 genes), and the results obtained by conventional methods were confirmed by molecular method. B. anthracis isolates, in the current study were found to be sensitive to penicillin, amoxicilline clavulanic acid, gentamicine, ampicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Bacillus anthracis is generally susceptible to antibacterials and we performed antibacterial susceptibility testing to detect whether resistance occurs in our isolates. Resistance observed in the B. anthracis isolates is an important issue for the treatment of human infections due to B. anthracis. To our knowledges there is limited publication [1] about the antibacterial resistance of the animal isolates in Turkey. It is pleasing that antibacterial resistance was not detected in our two isolates. Anthrax is a notifiable disease in Turkey. If an anthrax case occurs, it is alerted authorities of the ministry of food, agriculture, and livestock. Quarantine procedures are carried out by the authority for 20 days on the herds or zoo in which anthrax has occurred. The site where the animals died is thoroughly scorched with a down-directed flame and disinfected with 10% formalin. Burying the carcass deep (at least 6 feet) and covering with quick lime are valid procedure. Healthy animals are isolated and also monitored carefully for signs of the disease. The healthy domestic animals found in the infection area are annually vaccinated with B. anthracis non-encapsulated, Max Sterne 34F2 strain during a five-year period. Consequently, anthrax should be considered in cases where sudden death occurs in zoo animals.
  22 in total

1.  Histopathology in a murine model of anthrax.

Authors:  Scott Duong; Lucius Chiaraviglio; James E Kirby
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Comparison of PCR, culture and microscopy of blood smears for the diagnosis of anthrax in sheep and cattle.

Authors:  T Berg; H Suddes; G Morrice; M Hornitzky
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 3.  Anthrax and wildlife.

Authors:  M E Hugh-Jones; V de Vos
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.181

4.  Detection of Bacillus anthracis DNA by LightCycler PCR.

Authors:  Constance A Bell; James R Uhl; Ted L Hadfield; John C David; Richard F Meyer; Thomas F Smith; Franklin R Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Murine model of pulmonary anthrax: kinetics of dissemination, histopathology, and mouse strain susceptibility.

Authors:  C Rick Lyons; Julie Lovchik; Julie Hutt; Mary F Lipscomb; Eugenia Wang; Sara Heninger; Lucy Berliba; Kristin Garrison
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Specificity of an immunochromatographic test for anthrax.

Authors:  J D Muller; C R Wilks; K J O'Riley; R J Condron; R Bull; A Mateczun
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 7.  Anthrax in Europe: its epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and role in bioterrorism.

Authors:  G Schmid; A Kaufmann
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  A new Bacillus anthracis found in wild chimpanzees and a gorilla from West and Central Africa.

Authors:  Fabian H Leendertz; Saniye Yumlu; Georg Pauli; Christophe Boesch; Emmanuel Couacy-Hymann; Linda Vigilant; Sandra Junglen; Svenja Schenk; Heinz Ellerbrok
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Anthrax in eastern Turkey, 1992-2004.

Authors:  Zülal Ozkurt; Mehmet Parlak; Rustu Tastan; Ufuk Dinler; Yavuz S Saglam; Serhat F Ozyurek
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.