Literature DB >> 30369290

Treatment patterns in anticoagulant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation in Belgium: results from the GARFIELD-AF registry.

Frank Cools1, Bart Wollaert2, Geert Vervoort3, Stefan Verstraete4, Joeri Voet5, Kurt Hermans6, Alex Heyse7, Axel De Wolf8, Geert Hollanders9, Tim Boussy10, Wim Anné11, Jan Vercammen12, Dirk Faes13, Michel Beutels14, Georges Mairesse15, Philippe Purnode16, Ivan Blankoff17, Peter Vandergoten18, Luc Capiau19, Jagan Allu20, Jean-Pierre Bassand20,21, Gloria Kayani20.   

Abstract

Background: AF, anticoagulation, NOACs, changing patterns of prescription.
Methods: We describe baseline data and treatment patterns of patients recruited in Belgium in the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF). Recruitment began when novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were introduced and provides a unique picture of changing treatment patterns over time. 1713 patients with a new (≤6 weeks duration) diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and at least one investigator-defined stroke risk factor were recruited between May 2012 and August 2016, and will be prospectively followed for at least 2 years.
Results: Overall, anticoagulant use in Belgium was higher than in the rest of Europe: 80.1% of patients received an anticoagulant ± antiplatelet (AP) therapy (14.5% on vitamin K antagonists; 65.6% on NOAC), 10.7% AP therapy and 9.3% no antithrombotic therapy. Over time, we observed an increase in anticoagulant use and a decrease in AP use for stroke prevention. NOAC use in Belgium was the highest of Europe at the study start, with many countries catching up later. In high stroke risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2), anticoagulants were used in 84.3%, leaving 15.7% unprotected. In low risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc 0-1) anticoagulants were overused (58.7%). Factor Xa inhibitors were used more frequently than direct thrombin inhibitors.
Conclusion: Guideline adherence on stroke prevention was higher in Belgium than in the rest of Europe, and increased over time. NOAC use in Belgium was the highest of Europe at the study start, with many countries catching up later. Possible reasons are discussed. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01090362.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Belgium; GARFIELD-AF; NOAC; anticoagulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30369290     DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1494089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cardiol        ISSN: 0001-5385            Impact factor:   1.718


  3 in total

1.  Adherence and persistence to oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: A Belgian nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Maxim Grymonprez; Andreas Capiau; Stephane Steurbaut; Els Mehuys; Koen Boussery; Tine L De Backer; Lies Lahousse
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-29

2.  Non-adherence to Thromboprophylaxis Guidelines in Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review of the Extent of and Factors in Guideline Non-adherence.

Authors:  Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes; Sandra Salter; Leanne Chalmers; Luke Bereznicki; Kenneth Lee
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.571

3.  Impact of different anticoagulation management strategies on outcomes in atrial fibrillation: Dutch and Belgian results from the GARFIELD-AF registry.

Authors:  Jaap Seelig; Martin E W Hemels; Olivier Xhaët; Maarten C M Bongaerts; Axel de Wolf; Björn E Groenemeijer; Alex Heyse; Pieter Hoogslag; Joeri Voet; Jean-Paul R Herrman; Geert Vervoort; Walter Hermans; Bart Wollaert; Lucas V A Boersma; Kurt Hermans; Andreas Lucassen; Stefan Verstraete; Henk J Adriaansen; Georges H Mairesse; Willem F Terpstra; Dirk Faes; Mathijs Pieterse; Saverio Virdone; Freek W A Verheugt; Frank Cools; Hugo Ten Cate
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 16.036

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.