Nan Wang1,2, Anthony G Christodoulou1, Yibin Xie1, Zhenjia Wang3, Zixin Deng1, Bill Zhou1,4, Sangeun Lee1,5,6, Zhaoyang Fan1, Hyukjae Chang5,6, Wei Yu3, Debiao Li1,2. 1. Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 2. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 3. Department of Radiology, Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China. 4. David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California. 5. Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 6. College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI method capable of high spatiotemporal resolution, 3D carotid coverage, and T1-based quantification of contrast agent concentration for the assessment of carotid atherosclerosis using a newly developed Multitasking technique. METHODS: 5D imaging with 3 spatial dimensions, 1 T1 recovery dimension, and 1 DCE time dimension was performed using MR Multitasking based on low-rank tensor modeling, which allows direct T1 quantification with high spatiotemporal resolution (0.7 mm isotropic and 595 ms, respectively). Saturation recovery preparations followed by 3D segmented fast low angle shot readouts were implemented with Gaussian-density random 3D Cartesian sampling. A bulk motion removal scheme was developed to improve image quality. The proposed protocol was tested in phantom and human studies. In vivo scans were performed on 14 healthy subjects and 7 patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Kinetic parameters including area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC), vp , Ktrans , and ve were evaluated for each case. RESULTS: Phantom experiments showed that T1 measurements using the proposed protocol were in good agreement with reference value ( R 2 = 0.96 ). In vivo studies demonstrated that AUC, vp , and Ktrans in the patient group were significantly higher than in the control group (0.63 ± 0.13 versus 0.42 ± 0.12, P < 0.001; 0.14 ± 0.05 versus 0.11 ± 0.03, P = 0.034; and 0.13 ± 0.04 versus 0.08 ± 0.02, P < 0.001, respectively). Results from repeated subjects showed good interscan reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient: vp , 0.83; Ktrans , 0.87; ve , 0.92; AUC, 0.94). CONCLUSION: Multitasking DCE is a promising approach for quantitatively assessing the vascularity properties of the carotid vessel wall.
PURPOSE: To develop a dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI method capable of high spatiotemporal resolution, 3D carotid coverage, and T1-based quantification of contrast agent concentration for the assessment of carotid atherosclerosis using a newly developed Multitasking technique. METHODS: 5D imaging with 3 spatial dimensions, 1 T1 recovery dimension, and 1 DCE time dimension was performed using MR Multitasking based on low-rank tensor modeling, which allows direct T1 quantification with high spatiotemporal resolution (0.7 mm isotropic and 595 ms, respectively). Saturation recovery preparations followed by 3D segmented fast low angle shot readouts were implemented with Gaussian-density random 3D Cartesian sampling. A bulk motion removal scheme was developed to improve image quality. The proposed protocol was tested in phantom and human studies. In vivo scans were performed on 14 healthy subjects and 7 patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Kinetic parameters including area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC), vp , Ktrans , and ve were evaluated for each case. RESULTS: Phantom experiments showed that T1 measurements using the proposed protocol were in good agreement with reference value ( R 2 = 0.96 ). In vivo studies demonstrated that AUC, vp , and Ktrans in the patient group were significantly higher than in the control group (0.63 ± 0.13 versus 0.42 ± 0.12, P < 0.001; 0.14 ± 0.05 versus 0.11 ± 0.03, P = 0.034; and 0.13 ± 0.04 versus 0.08 ± 0.02, P < 0.001, respectively). Results from repeated subjects showed good interscan reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient: vp , 0.83; Ktrans , 0.87; ve , 0.92; AUC, 0.94). CONCLUSION: Multitasking DCE is a promising approach for quantitatively assessing the vascularity properties of the carotid vessel wall.
Authors: Karolien Jaspers; Hugo J W L Aerts; Tim Leiner; Marlies Oostendorp; Natal A W van Riel; Mark J Post; Walter H Backes Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Antoine Millon; Jean-Louis Mathevet; Loic Boussel; Peter L Faries; Zahi A Fayad; Philippe C Douek; Patrick Feugier Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Bruce A Wasserman; William I Smith; Hugh H Trout; Richard O Cannon; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Diederik F van Wijk; Aart C Strang; Raphael Duivenvoorden; Dirk-Jan F Enklaar; Rob J van der Geest; John J P Kastelein; Eric de Groot; Erik S G Stroes; Aart J Nederveen Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Morteza Naghavi; Peter Libby; Erling Falk; S Ward Casscells; Silvio Litovsky; John Rumberger; Juan Jose Badimon; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Pedro Moreno; Gerard Pasterkamp; Zahi Fayad; Peter H Stone; Sergio Waxman; Paolo Raggi; Mohammad Madjid; Alireza Zarrabi; Allen Burke; Chun Yuan; Peter J Fitzgerald; David S Siscovick; Chris L de Korte; Masanori Aikawa; K E Juhani Airaksinen; Gerd Assmann; Christoph R Becker; James H Chesebro; Andrew Farb; Zorina S Galis; Chris Jackson; Ik-Kyung Jang; Wolfgang Koenig; Robert A Lodder; Keith March; Jasenka Demirovic; Mohamad Navab; Silvia G Priori; Mark D Rekhter; Raymond Bahr; Scott M Grundy; Roxana Mehran; Antonio Colombo; Eric Boerwinkle; Christie Ballantyne; William Insull; Robert S Schwartz; Robert Vogel; Patrick W Serruys; Goran K Hansson; David P Faxon; Sanjay Kaul; Helmut Drexler; Philip Greenland; James E Muller; Renu Virmani; Paul M Ridker; Douglas P Zipes; Prediman K Shah; James T Willerson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sen Ma; Christopher T Nguyen; Fei Han; Nan Wang; Zixin Deng; Nader Binesh; Franklin G Moser; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zhehao Hu; Anthony G Christodoulou; Nan Wang; Jaime L Shaw; Shlee S Song; Marcel M Maya; Mariko L Ishimori; Lindsy J Forbess; Jiayu Xiao; Xiaoming Bi; Fei Han; Debiao Li; Zhaoyang Fan Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tianle Cao; Sen Ma; Nan Wang; Sara Gharabaghi; Yibin Xie; Zhaoyang Fan; Elliot Hogg; Chaowei Wu; Fei Han; Michele Tagliati; E Mark Haacke; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Nan Wang; Srinivas Gaddam; Lixia Wang; Yibin Xie; Zhaoyang Fan; Wensha Yang; Richard Tuli; Simon Lo; Andrew Hendifar; Stephen Pandol; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sen Ma; Nan Wang; Zhaoyang Fan; Marwa Kaisey; Nancy L Sicotte; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: John P McCallin; Dan Gazit; Debiao Li; Gadi Pelled; Margaux M Salas; Pei Han; Howard E Gill; Karl A Lautenschlager; Tristan T Lai; Cameron M Shawver; Matthew B Hoch; Brandon J Goff; Aaron M Betts; Zhengwei Zhou; Cody Lynch; Grant Schroeder; Maxim Bez; Marcel M Maya; Catherine Bresee; Zulma Gazit Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 4.379