Literature DB >> 303688

B-cell tolerance. IV. Differential role of surface IgM and IgD in determining tolerance susceptibility of murine B cells.

E S Vitetta, J C Cambier, F S Ligler, J R Kettman, J W Uhr.   

Abstract

During ontogeny IgD appears later than IgM on splenocytes of neonatal mice (1) and at a time when mice develop a markedly increased immune responsiveness (2). Based on these observations, it was suggested that IgD serves as a "triggering" isotype for induction of immune responses, whereas surface IgM functions as a tolerizing receptor (3). To test this hypothesis, the susceptibility of adult splenocytes (which are predominantly mu(+)delta(+)[4-6]) and neonatal splenocytes (which bear predominantly IgM [mup(+); 1, 4-6]) to tolerance induction were compared. The results indicate that neonatal splenic B cells responsive to thymus dependent (TD) antigens are exquisitely susceptible to tolerance induction compared with those from adult mice (7-9). However, cells from both adult and neonatal mice were highly susceptible to tolerance induction when thymus independent (TI) antigen was used as immunogen (8). These results suggest that the major precursor for the TD response is a mu(+)delta(+)-cell which appears late in ontogeny and is resistant to tolerance induction and that the mup(+)-cell is the major precursor for the TI response and is highly susceptible to tolerance induction. Other differences between responders for TI and TD antigens have been described previously (10-12). To test this concept, adult splenocytes were treated with papain under conditions in which IgD, but not five other surface molecules, was removed (13). Such treated splenocytes were shown to be markedly susceptible to tolerance induction, resembling TD responders from neonatal animals. This experiment was interpreted as indicating that IgD confers resistance to tolerance induction on mu(+)delta(+)-cells. To prove this interpretation, it is necessary to show that specific removal of IgD with anti-delta also results in increased susceptibility to tolerance induction and that treatment with anti-mu does not have a similar effect. In the present studies, we have removed surface IgM or IgD by antibody-induced capping and assessed the tolerance susceptibility of the treated cells. Our results demonstrate that removal of IgD, but no IgM, from TD responders increases their susceptibility to tolerance induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 303688      PMCID: PMC2181918          DOI: 10.1084/jem.146.6.1804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Med        ISSN: 0022-1007            Impact factor:   14.307


  16 in total

1.  Separate thymus dependent and thymus independent antibody forming cell precursors.

Authors:  J H Playfair; E C Purves
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1971-06-02

Review 2.  Generation of immunoglobulin class diversity in b cells: a discussion with emphasis on idg development.

Authors:  M D Cooper; J F Kearney; A R Lawton; E R Abney; R M Parkhouse; J L Preud'homme; M Seligmann
Journal:  Ann Immunol (Paris)       Date:  1976 Jun-Jul

3.  Antibody response to phosphorylcholine in vitro. II. Analysis of T-dependent and T-independent responses.

Authors:  J Quintáns; H Cosenza
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Cell surface immunoglobulin. XV. The presence of IgM and an IgD-like molecule on the same cell in murine lymphoid tissue.

Authors:  E S Vitetta; J W Uhr
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Role of IgD in the immune response and tolerance. I. Anti-delta pretreatment facilitates tolerance induction in adult B cells in vitro.

Authors:  D W Scott; J E Layton; G J Nossal
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  Maturation of the humoral immune response in mice.

Authors:  P G Spear; G M Edelman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1974-02-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  B-cell tolerance. II. Trinitrophenyl human gamma globulin-induced tolerance in adult and neonatal murine B cells responsive to thymus-dependent and independent forms of the same hapten.

Authors:  J C Cambier; E S Vitetta; J W Uhr; J R Kettman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

8.  B-cell tolerance. III. Effect of papain-mediated cleavage of cell surface IgD on tolerance susceptibility of murine B cells.

Authors:  J C Cambier; E S Vitetta; J R Kettman; G M Wetzel; J W Uhr
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-07-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  In vitro tolerance induction of neonatal murine B cells.

Authors:  E S Metcalf; N R Klinman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1976-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  The relationship between surface immunoglobulin isotype and immune function of murine B lymphocytes. I. Surface immunoglobulin isotypes on primed B cells in the spleen.

Authors:  I Zan-Bar; S Strober; E S Vitetta
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  18 in total

1.  In vivo effects of antiserum to IgD on surface immunoglobulins, serum immunoglobulins and lymphocyte blastogenesis in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  L N Martin; G A Leslie
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 2.  The enigmatic function of IgD: some answers at last.

Authors:  Cindy Gutzeit; Kang Chen; Andrea Cerutti
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Peripheral deletion of self-reactive B cells.

Authors:  D M Russell; Z Dembić; G Morahan; J F Miller; K Bürki; D Nemazee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-11-28       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Assessment of antigen-specific receptor function of surface immunoglobulin M and D with identical hapten specificity.

Authors:  R Tisch; M Watanabe; M Letarte; N Hozumi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Immunoglobulin subunits of murine B lymphocytes: structure and associations with other membrane proteins.

Authors:  L Vogel; D Haustein
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Functional differences between immunoglobulins M and D expressed on the surface of an immature B-cell line.

Authors:  R Tisch; C M Roifman; N Hozumi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Function of IgD in B cell triggering and tolerance: an overview of recent advances.

Authors:  R P Phipps; D W Scott
Journal:  Surv Immunol Res       Date:  1984

8.  B-cell subsets responsive to fluorescein-conjugated antigens. III. Differential effect of E. Coli lipopolysaccharide on T-dependent and T-independent responses in vivo.

Authors:  M Venkataraman; D W Scott
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 7.397

9.  Immunoglobulins D and M mediate signals that are qualitatively different in B cells with an immature phenotype.

Authors:  J E Alés-Martínez; G L Warner; D W Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Two new proteins preferentially associated with membrane immunoglobulin D.

Authors:  K M Kim; T Adachi; P J Nielsen; M Terashima; M C Lamers; G Köhler; M Reth
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.