Literature DB >> 30368798

Evolution of leaf structure and drought tolerance in species of Californian Ceanothus.

Leila R Fletcher1, Hongxia Cui2, Hilary Callahan3, Christine Scoffoni4, Grace P John1, Megan K Bartlett1, Dylan O Burge1, Lawren Sack1.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Studies across diverse species have established theory for the contribution of leaf traits to plant drought tolerance. For example, species in more arid climates tend to have smaller leaves of higher vein density, higher leaf mass per area, and more negative osmotic potential at turgor loss point (πTLP ). However, few studies have tested these associations for species within a given lineage that have diversified across an aridity gradient.
METHODS: We analyzed the anatomy and physiology of 10 Ceanothus (Rhamnaceae) species grown in a common garden for variation between and within "wet" and "dry" subgenera (Ceanothus and Cerastes, respectively) and analyzed a database for 35 species for leaf size and leaf mass per area (LMA). We used a phylogenetic generalized least squares approach to test hypothesized relationships among traits, and of traits with climatic aridity in the native range. We also tested for allometric relationships among anatomical traits. KEY
RESULTS: Leaf form, anatomy, and drought tolerance varied strongly among species within and between subgenera. Cerastes species had specialized anatomy including hypodermis and encrypted stomata that may confer superior water storage and retention. The osmotic potentials at turgor loss point (πTLP ) and full turgor (πo ) showed evolutionary correlations with the aridity index (AI) and precipitation of the 10 species' native distributions, and LMA with potential evapotranspiration for the 35 species in the larger database. We found an allometric correlation between upper and lower epidermal cell wall thicknesses, but other anatomical traits diversified independently.
CONCLUSIONS: Leaf traits and drought tolerance evolved within and across lineages of Ceanothus consistently with climatic distributions. The πTLP has signal to indicate the evolution of drought tolerance within small clades.
© 2018 Botanical Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  California lilac; Mediterranean climate; Rhamnaceae; chaparral; leaf anatomy; leaf traits; leaf venation; phylogenetic analysis; stomatal crypts; trait evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368798     DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  5 in total

1.  Cycads defy expectations for the coordination between drought and mechanical resistance. A commentary on: 'Correlations between leaf economics, mechanical resistance and drought tolerance across 41 cycad species'.

Authors:  Megan K Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.040

2.  Links between leaf anatomy and leaf mass per area of herbaceous species across slope aspects in an eastern Tibetan subalpine meadow.

Authors:  Xin'e Li; Xin Zhao; Yuki Tsujii; Yueqi Ma; Renyi Zhang; Cheng Qian; Zixi Wang; Feilong Geng; Shixuan Jin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Co-ordination between leaf biomechanical resistance and hydraulic safety across 30 sub-tropical woody species.

Authors:  Yong-Qiang Wang; Ming-Yuan Ni; Wen-Hao Zeng; Dong-Liu Huang; Wei Xiang; Peng-Cheng He; Qing Ye; Kun-Fang Cao; Shi-Dan Zhu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Developmental and biophysical determinants of grass leaf size worldwide.

Authors:  Alec S Baird; Samuel H Taylor; Jessica Pasquet-Kok; Christine Vuong; Yu Zhang; Teera Watcharamongkol; Christine Scoffoni; Erika J Edwards; Pascal-Antoine Christin; Colin P Osborne; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  CkREV regulates xylem vessel development in Caragana korshinskii in response to drought.

Authors:  Jiayang Li; Lifang Xie; Jiejie Ren; Tianxin Zhang; Jinhao Cui; Zhulatai Bao; Wenfei Zhou; Juan Bai; Chunmei Gong
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.