Nazire Nurdan Çakır1, Sezer Demirbuga2. 1. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Melikgazi, Kayseri, Turkey. nurdanncakir@hotmail.com. 2. Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Erciyes University, 38039, Melikgazi, Kayseri, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 24-month clinical performance of universal adhesives on the restoration success of Class I carious lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different universal adhesives (Gluma Bond Universal (GU), Clearfil Universal (CU), Prime&Bond Elect Universal (PU), All bond Universal (AU), and Single Bond Universal (SU)) were used in the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes in 42 patients. The study was conducted with 10 groups, with 20 restorations in each group. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and during a 24-month recall using World Dental Federation (FDI) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The changes in the parameters were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: At the end of 24 months, there was no loss of restoration in any group. According to the USPHS, there was no difference in the baseline and 24-month clinical behavior of the restorations (P ˃ 0.05). However, according to the FDI, when adhesives were used in the self-etch mode, three adhesives (GU, SU, PU) showed marginal incompatibility, and one adhesive showed (GU) marginal discoloration between baseline and the 24-month follow-up evaluation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference after 24 months between etch-and-rinse and self-etch groups according to the results based on both the USPHS and FDI criteria (P ˃ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-month clinical performance of the evaluated universal adhesives depends on the adhesive strategy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study helps clinicians to decide in which mode (etch-and-rinse or self-etch) universal adhesives can be safely used.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 24-month clinical performance of universal adhesives on the restoration success of Class I carious lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five different universal adhesives (Gluma Bond Universal (GU), Clearfil Universal (CU), Prime&Bond Elect Universal (PU), All bond Universal (AU), and Single Bond Universal (SU)) were used in the self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes in 42 patients. The study was conducted with 10 groups, with 20 restorations in each group. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and during a 24-month recall using World Dental Federation (FDI) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. The changes in the parameters were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: At the end of 24 months, there was no loss of restoration in any group. According to the USPHS, there was no difference in the baseline and 24-month clinical behavior of the restorations (P ˃ 0.05). However, according to the FDI, when adhesives were used in the self-etch mode, three adhesives (GU, SU, PU) showed marginal incompatibility, and one adhesive showed (GU) marginal discoloration between baseline and the 24-month follow-up evaluation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference after 24 months between etch-and-rinse and self-etch groups according to the results based on both the USPHS and FDI criteria (P ˃ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-month clinical performance of the evaluated universal adhesives depends on the adhesive strategy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study helps clinicians to decide in which mode (etch-and-rinse or self-etch) universal adhesives can be safely used.
Authors: David H Pashley; Kelli A Agee; Ricardo M Carvalho; Kwang-Won Lee; Franklin R Tay; Terry E Callison Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: R Hickel; J-F Roulet; S Bayne; S D Heintze; I A Mjör; M Peters; V Rousson; R Randall; G Schmalz; M Tyas; G Vanherle Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2007-01-30 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Y Yoshida; B Van Meerbeek; Y Nakayama; M Yoshioka; J Snauwaert; Y Abe; P Lambrechts; G Vanherle; M Okazaki Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 6.116