Literature DB >> 30368645

Provision of MR imaging for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): a single-center experience and national survey.

Aoife S Murray1,2, Paddy J Gilligan1, James M Bisset1, Chris Nolan3, Joseph M Galvin3,4, John G Murray5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) were traditionally denied access to MR imaging due to safety concerns. AIMS: The aim of this study was to review a single-center experience of MR imaging at 1.5T of patients with CIEDs and survey national availability of this service.
METHODS: Three hundred thirty-four patients with CIEDs were included in the review. Two hundred nine patients did not progress to MRI due to non MR-conditional CIEDs, retained pacing leads, recent implant insertion, and other patient factors. A record was made of CIED type, number of body parts imaged, numbers of repeat studies and complications. All devices were scanned with cardiology involvement.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients, 90 males, 35 females, aged 20-91 years progressed to MR imaging. Eighty-six patients had pacemakers, 15 had implantable cardioverter devices (ICDs), and 24 had implantable loop recorders (ILRs). Twenty-one patients had more than one body part scanned. Regions scanned included spine n = 82, joints n = 42, head n = 40, heart n = 8, and abdomen/pelvis n = 13. Twenty-six patients had multiple separate MR studies (range 2-6). Three complications included diaphragmatic stimulation when the device was switched to MR-conditional mode resulting in scan abandonment, device failure post-MRI requiring manufacturer reprogramming, and patient dizziness post reprogramming requiring cardiology review. One cardiac study was non-diagnostic due to artifact from a low left-sided ICD. Imaging of patients with pacemakers is available in 14 of 42 (38%) hospitals with MR units nationally.
CONCLUSION: MR-conditional CIEDs can be safely scanned with diagnostic quality at 1.5T using a protocol involving radiology and cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CIED; Implantable cardioverter device; Implantable loop recorder; MRI safety; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368645     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1922-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  32 in total

1.  Industry viewpoint: St. Jude Medical: Pacemakers, ICDs and MRI.

Authors:  Paul A Levine
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Industry viewpoint: Guidant: Pacemakers, ICDs, and MRI.

Authors:  Joseph M Smith
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Industry viewpoint: Medtronic: Pacemakers, ICDs, and MRI.

Authors:  Marshall S Stanton
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 4.  Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  Werner Irnich; Burkhard Irnich; Christine Bartsch; Wilhelm Alfred Stertmann; Hubert Gufler; Guenter Weiler
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Food and Drug Administration perspective: Magnetic resonance imaging of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients.

Authors:  Owen P Faris; Mitchell Shein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007.

Authors:  Emanuel Kanal; A James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; James P Borgstede; William G Bradley; Jerry W Froelich; Tobias Gilk; J Rod Gimbel; John Gosbee; Ellisa Kuhni-Kaminski; James W Lester; John Nyenhuis; Yoav Parag; Daniel J Schaefer; Elizabeth A Sebek-Scoumis; Jeffrey Weinreb; Loren A Zaremba; Pamela Wilcox; Leonard Lucey; Nancy Sass
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report.

Authors:  Jaimie M Henderson; Jean Tkach; Michael Phillips; Kenneth Baker; Frank G Shellock; Ali R Rezai
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Timm L Dickfeld; Hugh Calkins; Robert G Weiss; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of implantable cardiac rhythm devices at 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  J Rod Gimbel
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with an implantable loop recorder.

Authors:  Jorge A Wong; Raymond Yee; Lorne J Gula; Allan C Skanes; Ian G Ross; James B White; George J Klein; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical safety of ProMRI implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems during head and lower lumbar magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rudolf Bauer; Dennis H Lau; Christian Wollmann; Andrew McGavigan; Jacques Mansourati; Theresa Reiter; Simone Frömer; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.