Literature DB >> 30368641

Approaches for identifying U.S. medicare fraud in provider claims data.

Matthew Herland1, Richard A Bauder2, Taghi M Khoshgoftaar1.   

Abstract

Quality and affordable healthcare is an important aspect in people's lives, particularly as they age. The rising elderly population in the United States (U.S.), with increasing number of chronic diseases, implies continuing healthcare later in life and the need for programs, such as U.S. Medicare, to help with associated medical expenses. Unfortunately, due to healthcare fraud, these programs are being adversely affected draining resources and reducing quality and accessibility of necessary healthcare services. The detection of fraud is critical in being able to identify and, subsequently, stop these perpetrators. The application of machine learning methods and data mining strategies can be leveraged to improve current fraud detection processes and reduce the resources needed to find and investigate possible fraudulent activities. In this paper, we employ an approach to predict a physician's expected specialty based on the type and number of procedures performed. From this approach, we generate a baseline model, comparing Logistic Regression and Multinomial Naive Bayes, in order to test and assess several new approaches to improve the detection of U.S. Medicare Part B provider fraud. Our results indicate that our proposed improvement strategies (specialty grouping, class removal, and class isolation), applied to different medical specialties, have mixed results over the selected Logistic Regression baseline model's fraud detection performance. Through our work, we demonstrate that improvements to current detection methods can be effective in identifying potential fraud.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Big data; Fraud detection; Machine learning; Medicare

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368641     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-018-9460-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  4 in total

1.  Variability in Medicare utilization and payment among urologists.

Authors:  Joan S Ko; Heather Chalfin; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; Elizabeth Humphreys; Sung-Woo Park; H Ballentine Carter; Kevin D Frick; Misop Han
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Improving Fraud and Abuse Detection in General Physician Claims: A Data Mining Study.

Authors:  Hossein Joudaki; Arash Rashidian; Behrouz Minaei-Bidgoli; Mahmood Mahmoodi; Bijan Geraili; Mahdi Nasiri; Mohammad Arab
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-11-10

3.  Balancing the goals of health care provision and financing.

Authors:  Martin Feldstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Does Medical School Training Relate to Practice? Evidence from Big Data.

Authors:  Keith Feldman; Nitesh V Chawla
Journal:  Big Data       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.128

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Risk Assessment Framework Proposal Based on Bow-Tie Analysis for Medical Image Diagnosis Sharing within Telemedicine.

Authors:  Thiago Poleto; Maisa Mendonça Silva; Thárcylla Rebecca Negreiros Clemente; Ana Paula Henriques de Gusmão; Ana Paula de Barros Araújo; Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.