Literature DB >> 30368457

Assessment of parental mosaicism in SCN1A-related epilepsy by single-molecule molecular inversion probes and next-generation sequencing.

Eva H Brilstra1, Bobby P C Koeleman1, Iris M de Lange1, Marco J Koudijs1, Ruben van 't Slot1, Anja C M Sonsma1, Flip Mulder1, Ellen C Carbo1, Marjan J A van Kempen1, Isaac J Nijman1, Robert F Ernst1, Sanne M C Savelberg1, Nine V A M Knoers1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dravet syndrome is a severe genetic encephalopathy, caused by pathogenic variants in SCN1A. Low-grade parental mosaicism occurs in a substantial proportion of families (7%-13%) and has important implications for recurrence risks. However, parental mosaicism can remain undetected by methods regularly used in diagnostics. In this study, we use single-molecule molecular inversion probes (smMIP), a technique with high sensitivity for detecting low-grade mosaic variants and high cost-effectiveness, to investigate the incidence of parental mosaicism of SCN1A variants in a cohort of 90 families and assess the feasibility of this technique.
METHODS: Deep sequencing of SCN1A was performed using smMIPs. False positive rates for each of the proband's pathogenic variants were determined in 145 unrelated samples. If parents showed corresponding variant alleles at a significantly higher rate than the established noise ratio, mosaicism was confirmed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).
RESULTS: Sequence coverage of at least 100× at the location of the corresponding pathogenic variant was reached for 80 parent couples. The variant ratio was significantly higher than the established noise ratio in eight parent couples, of which four (5%) were regarded as true mosaics, based on ddPCR results. The false positive rate of smMIP analysis without ddPCR was therefore 50%. Three of these variants had previously been considered de novo in the proband by Sanger sequencing.
CONCLUSION: smMIP technology combined withnext generation sequencing (NGS) performs better than Sanger sequencing in the detection of parental mosaicism. Because parental mosaicism has important implications for genetic counselling and recurrence risks, we stress the importance of implementing high-sensitivity NGS-based assays in standard diagnostics. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990SCN1Azzm321990; GEFS+; dravet Syndrome; parental mosaicism; postzygotic mutation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368457     DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  4 in total

1.  Highly Sensitive Blocker Displacement Amplification and Droplet Digital PCR Reveal Low-Level Parental FOXF1 Somatic Mosaicism in Families with Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins.

Authors:  Justyna A Karolak; Qian Liu; Nina G Xie; Lucia R Wu; Gustavo Rocha; Susana Fernandes; Luk Ho-Ming; Ivan F Lo; David Mowat; Elizabeth K Fiorino; Morris Edelman; Joyce Fox; Denise A Hayes; David Witte; Ashley Parrott; Edwina Popek; Przemyslaw Szafranski; David Y Zhang; Pawel Stankiewicz
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Sodium channelopathies in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Miriam H Meisler; Sophie F Hill; Wenxi Yu
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Genetic Landscape of Rett Syndrome Spectrum: Improvements and Challenges.

Authors:  Silvia Vidal; Clara Xiol; Ainhoa Pascual-Alonso; M O'Callaghan; Mercè Pineda; Judith Armstrong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Detection of germline mosaicism in fathers of children with intellectual disability syndromes caused by de novo variants.

Authors:  Sofia Frisk; Alexandra Wachtmeister; Tobias Laurell; Anna Lindstrand; Nina Jäntti; Helena Malmgren; Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson; Bianca Tesi; Fulya Taylan; Ann Nordgren
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.183

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.