Literature DB >> 30368350

Surgical options for retreatment after small-incision lenticule extraction: Advantages and disadvantages.

Majid Moshirfar1, Tirth J Shah2, Maliha Masud2, Steven H Linn2, Yasmyne Ronquillo2, Phillip C Hoopes2.   

Abstract

Since the inception of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), many surgeons have speculated the lack of an adequate and standard retreatment procedure will impede its popularity. However, more than 1 million patients worldwide have had this surgery, with visual outcomes nearly equivalent to current laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) results. With the procedure's growing popularity, some patients will inevitably have a postoperative residual refractive error from regression, overcorrection, undercorrection, and astigmatic induction and will require retreatment. To our knowledge, literature reviewing major retreatment options is limited. Options include surface ablation, thin-flap LASIK, secondary small-incision lenticule extraction, and a cap-to-flap procedure (CIRCLE) in which a femtosecond laser is use to create cuts that convert the small-incision lenticule extraction cap into a LASIK flap. This review discusses major advantages and disadvantages of these options and compares the visual outcomes based on the existing literature. An algorithmic approach created from this analysis is presented to guide retreatment decision-making.
Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30368350     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia.

Authors:  Qin Qin; Lianyun Bao; Liping Yang; Zifang He; Zhenping Huang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Enhancement Options After Myopic Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Review.

Authors:  Jakob Siedlecki; Nikolaus Luft; Siegfried G Priglinger; Martin Dirisamer
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

3.  Small incision lenticule extraction retreatment in a patient with high residual refractive error after photorefractive keratectomy: A case report.

Authors:  Vardhaman P Kankariya; Michael A Grentzelos; Ankita B Dube; George D Kymionis; Ioannis G Pallikaris
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Small-Incision Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Intracorneal Concave Lenticule Implantation in Patients with Keratoconus.

Authors:  Qi Wei; Hui Ding; Ke Nie; He Jin; Tan Zhong; Hanyang Yu; Zhenduo Yang; Shisi Hu; Linyi He; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  SmartSurfACE transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Amr A Gab-Alla
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-01

6.  Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Mark T Parsons; Nicholas A Chartrand; Chap-Kay Lau; Seth Stapley; Nour Bundogji; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-12

7.  Characterization and Ex Vivo Application of Indocyanine Green Chitosan Patches in Dura Mater Laser Bonding.

Authors:  Francesca Rossi; Giada Magni; Roberto Colasanti; Martina Banchelli; Maurizio Iacoangeli; Erika Carrassi; Denis Aiudi; Alessandro Di Rienzo; Luca Giannoni; Laura Pieri; Stefano Dallari; Roberto Pini; Paolo Matteini
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.329

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.