Yuka Matsuzawa1, Yuen Shan Christine Lee1, Felicia Fraser2, Donna Langenbahn1, Amanda Shallcross3, Scott Powers4, Richard Lipton5, Naomi Simon6, Mia Minen7. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, the MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. 4. Division of Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Nonpharmacological interventions, such as biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and relaxation techniques are Level-A evidence-based treatments for headache. The impact of these interventions is often equivalent to or greater than pharmacological interventions, with fewer side effects. Despite such evidence, the rate of participation in nonpharmacological interventions for headache remains low. Once obstacles to optimizing use of behavioral interventions, such as local access to nonpharmacological treatment and primary headache providers are traversed, identification of barriers contributing to low adherence is imperative given the high levels of disability and cost associated with treating headache disorders. In this review of factors in adults associated with underuse of nonpharmacological interventions, we discuss psychological factors relevant to participation in nonpharmacological treatment, including attitudes and beliefs, motivation for change, awareness of triggers, locus of control, self-efficacy, acceptance, coping styles, personality traits, and psychiatric comorbidities associated with treatment adherence. Finally, future prospects and approaches to optimizing treatment matching and minimizing adherence issues are addressed. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team conducted this narrative review. Neuropsychologists conducted a literature search during the month of July 2017 using a combination of the keywords ("headache" or "migraine") and ("adherence" or "compliance") or "barriers to treatment" or various "psychological factors" discussed in this narrative review. Content experts, a psychiatrist, and a complementary and integrative health specialist provided additional commentary and input to this narrative review resulting in integration of additional noteworthy studies, book chapters and books. RESULTS: Various psychological factors, such as attitudes and beliefs, lack of motivation, poor awareness of triggers, external locus of control, poor self-efficacy, low levels of acceptance, and engagement in maladaptive coping styles can contribute to nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: To maximize adherence, clinicians can assess and address an individual's level of treatment acceptance, beliefs that may present as barriers, readiness for change, locus of control, self-efficacy and psychiatric comorbidities. Identification of barriers to adherence as well as the application of relevant assessment and intervention techniques have the potential to facilitate adherence and ultimately improve treatment success.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Nonpharmacological interventions, such as biofeedback, cognitive behavioral therapy, and relaxation techniques are Level-A evidence-based treatments for headache. The impact of these interventions is often equivalent to or greater than pharmacological interventions, with fewer side effects. Despite such evidence, the rate of participation in nonpharmacological interventions for headache remains low. Once obstacles to optimizing use of behavioral interventions, such as local access to nonpharmacological treatment and primary headache providers are traversed, identification of barriers contributing to low adherence is imperative given the high levels of disability and cost associated with treating headache disorders. In this review of factors in adults associated with underuse of nonpharmacological interventions, we discuss psychological factors relevant to participation in nonpharmacological treatment, including attitudes and beliefs, motivation for change, awareness of triggers, locus of control, self-efficacy, acceptance, coping styles, personality traits, and psychiatric comorbidities associated with treatment adherence. Finally, future prospects and approaches to optimizing treatment matching and minimizing adherence issues are addressed. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team conducted this narrative review. Neuropsychologists conducted a literature search during the month of July 2017 using a combination of the keywords ("headache" or "migraine") and ("adherence" or "compliance") or "barriers to treatment" or various "psychological factors" discussed in this narrative review. Content experts, a psychiatrist, and a complementary and integrative health specialist provided additional commentary and input to this narrative review resulting in integration of additional noteworthy studies, book chapters and books. RESULTS: Various psychological factors, such as attitudes and beliefs, lack of motivation, poor awareness of triggers, external locus of control, poor self-efficacy, low levels of acceptance, and engagement in maladaptive coping styles can contribute to nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: To maximize adherence, clinicians can assess and address an individual's level of treatment acceptance, beliefs that may present as barriers, readiness for change, locus of control, self-efficacy and psychiatric comorbidities. Identification of barriers to adherence as well as the application of relevant assessment and intervention techniques have the potential to facilitate adherence and ultimately improve treatment success.
Authors: Rachelle R Ramsey; Jamie L Ryan; Andrew D Hershey; Scott W Powers; Brandon S Aylward; Kevin A Hommel Journal: Headache Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Rebecca Erwin Wells; Elizabeth K Seng; Robert R Edwards; David E Victorson; Charles R Pierce; Lauren Rosenberg; Vitaly Napadow; Zev Schuman-Olivier Journal: Expert Rev Neurother Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 4.618
Authors: Adama Jalloh; Olivia Begasse de Dhaem; Elizabeth Seng; Mia T Minen Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: Mia T Minen; Sarah Corner; Thomas Berk; Valeriya Levitan; Steven Friedman; Samrachana Adhikari; Elizabeth B Seng Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 3.238