Literature DB >> 30367556

Concurrent wasting and stunting among under-five children in Niakhar, Senegal.

Michel Garenne1,2,3,4, Mark Myatt5, Tanya Khara6, Carmel Dolan6, André Briend7,8.   

Abstract

The study describes the patterns of concurrent wasting and stunting (WaSt) among children age 6-59 months living in the 1980s in Niakhar, a rural area of Senegal under demographic surveillance. Wasting and stunting were defined by z scores lower than -2 in weight for height and height for age. Both conditions were found to be highly prevalent, wasting more so before age 30 months, stunting more so after age 30 months. As a result, concurrent WaSt peaked around age 18 months and its prevalence (6.2%) was primarily the product of the two conditions, with an interaction term of 1.57 (p < 10-6 ). The interaction was due to the correlation between both conditions (more stunting if wasted, more wasting if stunted). Before age 30 months, boys were more likely to be concurrently wasted and stunted than girls (RR = 1.61), but the sex difference disappeared after 30 months of age. The excess susceptibility of younger boys could not be explained by muscle mass or fat mass measured by arm or muscle circumference, triceps, or subscapular skinfold. Concurrent WaSt was a strong risk factor for child mortality, and its effect was the product of the independent effect of each component, with no significant interaction.
© 2018 The Authors. Maternal and Child Nutrition Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Senegal; anthropometry; child survival; concurrent wasting & stunting; stunting; wasting

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30367556      PMCID: PMC6587969          DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


Prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting (WaSt) among under‐five children is the product of independent wasting and stunting, plus an interaction term of 57%. Prevalence of WaSt peaks around age 18 months. Prevalence of WaSt is about 50% higher among boys than among girls before age 30 months, largely because their higher susceptibility to stunting but not higher thereafter. Excess mortality associated with WaSt is the product of that associated with wasting and that associated with stunting.

INTRODUCTION

Malnutrition in children under five is still widely prevalent in the world. It is the focus of numerous research works and of numerous public health interventions (Black et al., 2008; Briend, Collins, Golden, Manary, & Myatt, 2013; McDonald et al., 2013). Child malnutrition is primarily defined by anthropometric indicators, in reference to international growth standards elaborated in populations free of malnutrition. These anthropometric indicators describe the various dimensions of child growth in particular linear growth (bones), fat, and muscle. The aetiology of malnutrition is complex, as nutritional status is the product of numerous interactions between food intake, disease, metabolism, immunity, and endocrine system. Of particular importance for lower‐and‐middle‐income countries (LMIC) is the well‐documented synergistic effect of nutrition and infection (Scrimshaw, 2003; Scrimshaw & SanGiovanni, 1997). A recent review summarized current knowledge on the complex interactions between nutritional status (linear growth, fat, muscle) and body functions (metabolism, immunity, endocrine system; Briend, Khara, & Dolan, 2015). Of particular importance is the role of muscle on the production of amino acids necessary for vital organs (heart, kidney, thymus) and that of fat as an energy provider. Fat also has an influence on hormonal production, in particular leptin, which has numerous effects on the immune system as well as on linear growth. Various forms of malnutrition may result from deficits in diet (low food intake, deficits in micronutrients and vitamins, imbalance between proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids), from infections, or from dysfunctions of organs. In turn, these anomalies may have an impact on child growth measured by anthropometric indicators. In nutritional epidemiologic studies, nutritional status is first defined by weight and height in relation to age. In the early 1970s, John Waterlow introduced a distinction between wasting (acute malnutrition) defined by low weight for height and stunting (chronic malnutrition) defined by low height for age. Both indicators were assumed to be largely independent of each other (Waterlow, 1972). The proportion of children who are wasted and the proportion of children who are stunted are the leading indicators of nutritional status used in Demographic and Health Surveys, conducted throughout LMIC (Akombi, Agho, Merom, Renzaho, & Hall, 2017). Wasting is more typical in younger children (6–29 months) and stunting in older children (30–59 months), although both could occur at any age. Children under 6 months of age, most of them fully breastfed, have been assumed to be relatively free of malnutrition, although this assumption has been challenged in the literature (Kerac, Mwangome, McGrath, Haider, & Berkley, 2015). In most countries, and in particular in sub‐Saharan Africa, sex differences in prevalence of malnutrition are small, if not negligible (Garenne, 2003). Large sex differences in nutritional status and mortality are found mostly in South‐Asia and are associated with family composition and differential food allocation by sex and birth order, with girls of birth order 2+ being at higher risk (Das Gupta, 1987; Mishra, Roy, & Retherford, 2004; Pande, 2003). No such effects have been documented so far in Africa (Garenne, 2003). Recent research has revisited the relationships between wasting and stunting, partly because it is now recognized that many common factors could cause both conditions, that their effect on mortality is due to the same mechanisms, with similar changes in body composition and partly because prevention strategies are similar for both conditions (Briend et al., 2015; Victora, 1992; Martorell & Young, 2012). In addition, there is a renewed interest in concurrent WaSt (defined as being both wasted and stunted at the same time), a condition that has been rarely studied. This more severe pathology may necessitate special treatments or special attention because of its high mortality risk (McDonald et al., 2013). In recent studies, concurrent WaSt was found more prevalent than assumed earlier and is now seen as a specific problem requiring special attention (Angood, Khara, Dolan, & Berkley, 2016; Bergeron & Castleman, 2012; Khara & Dolan, 2014; Khara, Mwangome, Ngari, & Dolan, 2018; Myatt et al., 2017; Myatt et al., 2018; Richard et al., 2012). The aim of this paper is to describe the demographic patterns (prevalence, age pattern, sex differences, mortality) of concurrent WaSt, in a rural community of Senegal, using data collected in the 1980s.

DATA AND METHODS

The data used for this analysis were collected in the early 1980s as part of a comprehensive research project on the relationships between nutritional status and mortality among preschool children. This dataset is large and comprehensive and has been used for comparative studies. The project has been described in details elsewhere (Briend, Garenne, Maire, Fontaine, & Dieng, 1989; Briend, Maire, Fontaine, & Garenne, 2012; Garenne et al., 2009; Garenne, Maire, Fontaine, & Briend, 2006, 2012; Garenne, Maire, Fontaine, Dieng, & Briend, 1987, 2000). In brief, the study was conducted in a rural community of about 25,000 people living in 30 villages near Niakhar, Fatick region, in central Senegal. This population was living on farming, growing millet and peanuts, and raising cattle, sheep, and goats. Living standards were still low at that time, prevalence of malnutrition moderate, and under‐five mortality was very high (271 per 1,000 live births). The Niakhar study was conducted in the framework of a comprehensive Demographic Surveillance System, with full counts of population dynamics (births, deaths, inmigration and outmigration). All under‐five children living in the study area were visited four times at 6‐month interval (May and November 1983 and 1984), with comprehensive anthropometric assessment (weight, height, head circumference, arm circumference, triceps skinfold, subscapular skinfold). For this study, children age 6–59 months were selected, who had complete measures at nutritional assessment (N = 12,638 in total). Children could be seen one, two, three or four times depending on their age and availability: 2,708 children in May 1983, 3,253 children in November 1983, 3,380 children in May 1984, 3,297 children in November 1984, for an average of 3,160 children per visit. The unit of analysis was the visit, a combination of child and age. All children were monitored for survival for 6 months after each nutritional assessment (304 deaths were recorded). More details on the study can be found elsewhere (Garenne et al., 1987, 2000, 2006, 2009, 2012). Anthropometric measures were standardized (z scores) using the CDC‐2000 growth standards: weight‐for‐age (WAZ), height‐for‐age (HAZ), and weight‐for‐height (WHZ) (CDC, 2000). The use of CDC‐2000 standard was justified here because it provided the highest sensitivity and specificity for screening the mortality risk.

Case definitions

This study focuses on wasting, stunting, and concurrent WaSt, defined as follows: Stunted: HAZ < −2.0. Wasted: WHZ < −2.0. Concurrently wasted and stunted (WaSt): WHZ < −2.0 and HAZ < −2.0. Severity of concurrent WaSt: “mild” = WHZ < −1.0 and HAZ < −1.0; “moderate” = WHZ < −2.0 and HAZ < −2.0; “severe” = WHZ < −3.0 and HAZ < −3.0 (categories are exclusive of each other, with highest severity prevailing). For multivariate analysis, two other indicators were calculated: Combined WaSt z score: WaStZ = (WHZ + HAZ)/2 if WHZ < 0 and HAZ < 0; = 0 otherwise. Interaction between wasting z score and stunting z score: WaxStZ = −(WHZ × HAZ) if WHZ < 0 and HAZ < 0; = 0 otherwise.

Methods

Straightforward statistical methods were used for this study: basic cross‐tabulations and multivariate analysis, using linear models (on z scores) and Logit‐linear models (on prevalence of conditions). All calculations were done using SPSS‐17.

RESULTS

Prevalence of wasting, stunting, and interaction

The prevalence of wasting (16.3%), stunting (24.2%), and concurrent WaSt (6.2%) was moderate in Niakhar, with higher wasting and lower stunting than the national average for Senegal in 1992 and than the average of African countries in the 1990s (6.8% wasting and 36.4% stunting). Considered by 12‐month age groups, wasting was highest at 12–23 months, stunting at 24–35 months, and concurrent WaSt at 12–23 months. The prevalence of concurrent WaSt was 1.57 times the product of the prevalence of wasting by that of stunting, indicating an interaction between the two conditions (under the hypothesis of independence it should be equal to the product). This interaction was highest for children age 6–11 months (2.16, p = 0.038) and lowest (1.21) for children age 48–59 months (Table 1).
Table 1

Prevalence of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, by age group, Niakhar 1983–1984 (N = 12,638 measures)

Prevalence (%)Interaction
Age group (months)Wasted (WHZ < −2)Stunted (HAZ < −2)Wasted and stuntedValue95% CI
(Wa)(st)(wast)(wast/Wa × st)Min‐max
6–1119.9%10.6%4.5%2.16*1.62–2.87
12–2329.5%26.0%11.0%1.44*1.25–1.66
24–3518.2%32.4%9.1%1.54*1.29–1.82
36–477.2%26.3%3.6%1.91*1.49–2.45
48–596.9%20.7%1.7%1.210.86–1.69
Total16.3%24.2%6.2%1.57*1.43–1.72

Note. Interaction terms were statistically significant (RR <> 1), with p values <10−6, except for the 48–59 age group (not significant). p values and confidence intervals calculated with standard formulae for risk ratios. (*) p < 0.05.

Prevalence of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, by age group, Niakhar 1983–1984 (N = 12,638 measures) Note. Interaction terms were statistically significant (RR <> 1), with p values <10−6, except for the 48–59 age group (not significant). p values and confidence intervals calculated with standard formulae for risk ratios. (*) p < 0.05. The interactions between wasting and stunting are further illustrated in Figure 1: The proportion of wasted children increased markedly with the degree of stunting, in a dose–response (log linear) relationship. Similarly, the proportion of stunted children increased with the degree of wasting, although the relationship was less linear (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Interactions between wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984. (a) Effect of wasting on stunting, (b) Effect of stunting on wasting

Interactions between wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984. (a) Effect of wasting on stunting, (b) Effect of stunting on wasting The interaction between wasting and stunting (defined by −2 z score) was further investigated by linear‐logistic regression of the proportion wasted (dependent variable) on stunting (independent variable), after controlling for age and sex. The effect of stunting on wasting was strong and highly significant and similar for younger children age 6–29 months and for older children age 30–59 months. An increase in stunting of −2 units in z score increased the probability of being wasted 2.43 times below age 30 months and 2.11 times above 30 months. Surprisingly, male sex had a positive effect below age 30 months (+12% more wasting among boys at the same level of stunting) but negative above age 30 months (−20% less wasting among boys at the same level of stunting) (Table 2).
Table 2

Net effect of stunting, age, and sex on wasting, Niakhar 1983–1984

VariableChildren 6–29 monthsChildren 30–59 monthsDifference between age groups
B coefficient p valueB coefficient p value p value
HAZ−0.4435<10–6* −0.3725<10–6* 0.114
Sex (male)+0.11700.057−0.22400.015*0.002*
Age+0.2094<10–6* −0.3559<10–6* <10–6*
Age2 −0.0063<10–6* +0.0039<10–6* <10–6*
Constant−3.1984<10–6* +5.0068<10–6* <10–6*

Note. Dependent variable = proportion wasted (WHZ < −2); (*) p < 0.05. The net effect of each variable can be computed as = exp (bX). Age and age2 were used because the relationship with age was curvilinear. Sex = 1 for males, 0 for females.

Net effect of stunting, age, and sex on wasting, Niakhar 1983–1984 Note. Dependent variable = proportion wasted (WHZ < −2); (*) p < 0.05. The net effect of each variable can be computed as = exp (bX). Age and age2 were used because the relationship with age was curvilinear. Sex = 1 for males, 0 for females.

Age patterns

The age patterns of wasting, stunting, and interaction are displayed in Figure 2. After the age of 6 months, the proportion of wasted children increased rapidly with age, peaked around 16 months (31%), and declined first slowly, then rapidly to reach low levels (7%) after 42 months. The proportion of stunted children increased less rapidly with age, reached a later peak around 28 months (33%), before declining slowly and remaining at high level (20%) by age 59 months. The proportion of children concurrently wasted and stunted followed the product wasted × stunted, with a fast increase from 6 to 18 months, a peak around 19 months (12%), followed by a decline after 24 months and becoming negligible after 48 months (1.7%). Age is therefore a fundamental aspect of the dynamics of the patterns of malnutrition among these children.
Figure 2

Prevalence by age of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984

Prevalence by age of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984

Sex differences

As already noticed (see Table 2), sex differences in susceptibility to concurrent WaSt were very marked, atypical, and changing with age. The issue of sex differences was further investigated by calculating the sex ratios of prevalence, defined as the ratio of male prevalence/female prevalence. Wasting was more prevalent among young boys, (before age 24 months) and similar in older boys and girls. Stunting was always more prevalent among boys and more so before 36 months; interactions were roughly equivalent between boys and girls, with a small (not significant) trend towards being more pronounced for younger boys (age 6–23 months) and less pronounced for older boys (36–59 months) (Table 3).
Table 3

Sex ratios of prevalence of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, by age group, Niakhar 1983–1984

Age group (months)Sex ratio of prevalence (boys/girls)Interaction
Wasted (WHZ < −2)Stunted (HAZ < −2)Wasted and stuntedValue
Sex ratio p value
(Wa)(st)(wast)(wast)(wast/Wa × st)
6–121.23*1.82*2.34*7.5E‐04*1.04
12–241.20*1.35*1.69*5.3E‐06*1.04
24–361.011.24*1.170.2300.93
36–480.771.120.820.3290.96
48–600.841.140.880.6770.91
Total1.081.241.36*2.4E‐05*1.02

Note. (*) p < 0.05. p values test the sex ratio for wasting and stunting (SR <> 1). None of the sex ratio of the interactions was significant.

Sex ratios of prevalence of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, by age group, Niakhar 1983–1984 Note. (*) p < 0.05. p values test the sex ratio for wasting and stunting (SR <> 1). None of the sex ratio of the interactions was significant. Figure 3 displays the pattern of sex differences in concurrent WaSt into more details. Prevalence of WaSt was much higher for males at 6–23 months (RR = 1.77) and no difference after 24 months, with a minor tendency to higher prevalence among females. A multivariate analysis conducted after controlling for age showed that the net effect of sex on WaSt changed sign between age 6–29 months (b = +0.534, p < 10−6) and age 30–59 months (b = −0.095, p = 0.495), the change being highly significant (p < 10−6).
Figure 3

Sex differences in prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984

Sex differences in prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984

Impact of severity of concurrent WaSt on sex differences

The severity of concurrent WaSt was calculated from the composite index defined above: (WHZ + HAZ)/2 if both negative, 0 otherwise. Severity categories were: “mild” for Z < −1, “moderate” for Z < −2, and “severe” for Z < −3. The pattern of sex differences was proportionate to the degree of severity of concurrent WaSt below age 30 months but not above age 30 months. (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Effect of severity of concurrent wasting and stunting on sex differences in prevalence, Niakhar 1983–1984

Effect of severity of concurrent wasting and stunting on sex differences in prevalence, Niakhar 1983–1984

Relationships with other anthropometric indicators

Anthropometric indicators are good proxies for body composition, although fat mass and muscle mass measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry can only be approximated by anthropometric measures (Jensen et al., 2015). Body composition differs between sexes: Boys have a higher fat‐free mass and a lower fat mass than girls. In Niakhar (as elsewhere), boys had a larger arm circumference (143.5 mm) than girls (142.7 mm), the difference being significant (p = 0.014), and this was true at all ages. This difference did not correlate with their higher susceptibility to concurrent WaSt at younger ages. When standardized by age, boys had a lower MUAC‐for‐age z score (−1.485) than girls (−1.324), the difference being highly significant (p < 10−6). This difference was consistent at all ages, although the difference was more pronounced before age 30 months (−0.25 z score), than after age 30 months (−0.08 z score). This is the only difference that goes in the direction of observed differences in prevalence of concurrent WaSt between boys and girls. However, it does not seem to explain these observed differences. In fact, adding MUAC‐for‐age z score in a multivariate analysis reduced the net effect of sex for younger and older children but did not modify the relative risks between younger (1.88) and older children (1.68). Overall, girls had thicker triceps skinfolds (8.57 mm) and thicker subscapular skinfolds (6.31 mm) than boys (8.15 mm and 5.98 mm respectively), the differences being highly significant (p < 10−6). The difference in triceps and subscapular skinfolds between boys and girls was very small at age 6–11 months (−0.052 and − 0.048 mm) and tended to increase with age up to age 59 months (−0.522 and − 0.564 mm). Therefore, this difference did not correlate with sex differences in concurrent WaSt, and in fact, it goes in the opposite direction: The increasing advantage of girls in fat stores is associated with their decreasing advantage compared with boys in the risk of being simultaneously wasted and stunted. Overall, boys had a larger muscle circumference (117.9 mm) than girls (116.8 mm), and the difference between both (2.1 mm) was consistent over age from 6 to 59 months. Muscle mass was therefore not associated with the changing sex difference in concurrent WaSt. Prevalence of concurrent WaSt was further analysed in multivariate analysis with respect to anthropometric indicators other than weight and height: head circumference, triceps skinfold, subscapular skinfold, and muscle arm circumference, plus age and sex. In both age groups, the net effects of anthropometric indicators were all statistically significant, in the same direction (positive or negative) and of about the same magnitude. The net effect of sex was in the same direction but not of the same magnitude. The effect of age changed markedly (as seen earlier on Figure 2). The effect of muscle circumference increased with increasing age. The changing sex ratio was conserved, with higher values before age 30 months (SR = 4.24) than after (SR = 1.75), the difference being significant (p < 10−4). In this case however, boys appeared to be always at higher risk of being concurrently wasted and stunted, after controlling for the other variables (Table 4).
Table 4

Effect of age, sex, and anthropometric indicators on prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984

VariableChildren age 6–29Children age 30–59Difference in coefficients
Coefficient p valueCoefficient p value p value
Age+0.716<10–6* −0.0360.746<10–6*
Age2 −0.014<10–6* +0.0010.628<10–6*
Sex (male)+1.446<10–6* +0.5620.0020*<10–4*
Head circumference−0.055<10–6* −0.053<10–6* 0.814
Tricipital−0.038<10–6* −0.041<10–6* 0.755
Subscapular−0.0180.0054*−0.0180.0600.974
Muscle circumference−0.160<10–6* −0.193<10–6* 0.028
Constant34.764<10–6* 47.961<10–6*

Note. (*) p < 0.05. Dependent variable: prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting (WHZ and HAZ < −2 z score). Head circumference and muscle arm circumference in mm. Triceps and subscapular skinfold in 10 × mm. Sex = 1 for males, 0 for females.

Effect of age, sex, and anthropometric indicators on prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984 Note. (*) p < 0.05. Dependent variable: prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting (WHZ and HAZ < −2 z score). Head circumference and muscle arm circumference in mm. Triceps and subscapular skinfold in 10 × mm. Sex = 1 for males, 0 for females.

Mortality risk

Numerous studies have documented the relationships between nutritional status and under‐five mortality (McDonald et al., 2013; Pelletier, 1994). An earlier analysis of the same data showed the independent effects of anthropometric indicators on child survival and in particular those of wasting and stunting (Garenne et al., 2006). The current analysis provides further evidence by age and sex. Wasting, stunting, and their interaction had a positive effect on mortality (lower z scores increased the risk of death), the effect being significant only for wasting at age 6–29 months and the effect being only significant for stunting at age 30–59 months. The interaction term added only little (1.08 and 1.15 respectively) and was not statistically significant in any of the two age groups. Sex differences in mortality were not significant after controlling for stunting and wasting (Table 5).
Table 5

Effect of age, sex, stunting, wasting, and interaction on mortality, Niakhar 1983–1984

VariableChildren age 6–29 monthsChildren age 30–59 months
B coefficient p valueNet effectB coefficient p valueNet effect
Age−0.00040.969−0.03390.027*
Sex−0.01540.909−0.37850.126
Stunting−0.13780.1501.31−0.47510.00007*2.57
Wasting−0.26080.004*1.66−0.05520.7521.12
Interaction−0.04120.3261.08−0.07140.2881.15
Constant−3.8629<10−6*−3.9151<10−6*

Note. Net effect = relative risk of mortality associated with −2 z score; sex = 1 for males; stunting and wasting defined by dummy variables; (*) p < 0.05.

Effect of age, sex, stunting, wasting, and interaction on mortality, Niakhar 1983–1984 Note. Net effect = relative risk of mortality associated with −2 z score; sex = 1 for males; stunting and wasting defined by dummy variables; (*) p < 0.05. Altogether, the combined effect of wasting and stunting appears to have a huge effect on child survival: The mortality of children who are below −4 z score, computed as (WHZ + HAZ)/2, is 11.1 times that of children who are above the median in weight for height and height for age. In terms of attributable risk, the combined effect of WaSt explained some 51% of the total mortality (Figure 5). However, this effect remains still lower than that produced by MUAC (Garenne et al., 2006).
Figure 5

Mortality according to the combined effect of stunting and wasting, Niakhar 1983–1984

Mortality according to the combined effect of stunting and wasting, Niakhar 1983–1984

DISCUSSION

This study explored the interactions between wasting and stunting. Overall, wasting and stunting appear at first glance as largely independent, as they do not pertain to the same age groups and as the prevalence of concurrent WaSt by age is primarily defined by the product of both conditions. However, the interaction term (57% excess prevalence compared with the product) was significant, indicating that stunting and wasting are correlated. This interaction has implications for early detection and treatments of children at highest risk due to the multiplicative effect of both conditions on child mortality (additive effects in the logarithm of mortality risk translate into multiplicative effects). The interactions between wasting and stunting raise a new question: Are they both produced by a common factor (nutritional, immunological, hormonal) or by increased susceptibility (stunted children being more likely to become wasted and wasted children being more likely to become stunted). This point requires further investigation. The prevalence of concurrent WaSt can be only partly explained by linear growth, muscle mass, and fat mass, as measured by available anthropometric indicators, all playing an independent and significant role. More research is needed on the precise role of muscle mass and fat mass with more precise measures than anthropometry. This study therefore suggests the existence of other underlying factors, which cause variations by age and sex. In particular, large differences by age suggest that other strong factors are playing a role: Immunological factors, as a result of the synergistic effect of repeated infections on the immune system or hormonal factors caused by the complex production of hormones in infancy and childhood and their interactions with metabolism. One of the most striking findings of this study was the sex difference, which changes rapidly with age. Changing sex ratios with age suggests the action of sex‐specific hormones. This has been found for a variety of infectious diseases, for auto‐immune diseases, for asthma, and other conditions. (Garenne, 2015; Garenne & Lafon, 1998). Here, the situation shows a higher susceptibility for boys below age 30 months, which disappears thereafter. This could be due to one of the sex hormones increasing susceptibility of boys at an early age and becoming silent later (Bartz et al., 2014). A potential candidate is testosterone, which is produced in early infancy and tends to disappear later, to become revived at adolescence: Testosterone could have an effect on boy's stunting in infancy, with some long‐term effects in the second year of childhood (Kuiri‐Hänninen, Sankilampi, & Dunkel, 2014). Another candidate is the difference in the dynamics of Luteinizing hormone and Follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH) among boys and girls: In particular, FSH tends to disappear among boys after age 6 months, while it stays at high levels in girls until 3 to 4 years, which apparently matches the pattern found for concurrent WaSt (Kuiri‐Hänninen et al., 2014). Other potential candidates are Sertoli cell hormones (Müllerian inhibiting substance or the inhibin B), shown to have an effect on boys stature (Andersson et al., 1998; Morgan, Dennis, Ruffman, Bilkey, & McLennan, 2011). Further research is needed in this field to clarify these complex issues. Whatever the aetiology of concurrent WaSt, the case deserves more attention because of its impact on child survival. Prevention, early detection, and appropriate treatments need to be identified to tackle this important public health issue, affecting millions of children in developing countries (Briend, 2015).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

CONTRIBUTIONS

MG and AB initiated the study and conducted the field work. MG conducted the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft. All authors contributed to the paper through comments and references, and all agree with the final draft.
  31 in total

1.  Mid-upper arm circumference and weight-for-height to identify high-risk malnourished under-five children.

Authors:  André Briend; Bernard Maire; Olivier Fontaine; Michel Garenne
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The association between wasting and stunting: an international perspective.

Authors:  C G Victora
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Distributions of mortality risk attributable to low nutritional status in Niakhar, Senegal.

Authors:  Michel Garenne; Bernard Maire; Olivier Fontaine; André Briend
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences.

Authors:  Robert E Black; Lindsay H Allen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Laura E Caulfield; Mercedes de Onis; Majid Ezzati; Colin Mathers; Juan Rivera
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Patterns of stunting and wasting: potential explanatory factors.

Authors:  Reynaldo Martorell; Melissa F Young
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: the role of siblings.

Authors:  Rohini P Pande
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-08

Review 7.  Historical concepts of interactions, synergism and antagonism between nutrition and infection.

Authors:  Nevin S Scrimshaw
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Sex differences in health indicators among children in African DHS surveys.

Authors:  Michel Garenne
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2003-10

9.  Incidence and duration of severe wasting in two African populations.

Authors:  Michel Garenne; Douladel Willie; Bernard Maire; Olivier Fontaine; Roger Eeckels; André Briend; Jan Van den Broeck
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  The stature of boys is inversely correlated to the levels of their sertoli cell hormones: do the testes restrain the maturation of boys?

Authors:  Kirstie Morgan; Nicola A Dennis; Ted Ruffman; David K Bilkey; Ian S McLennan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  33 in total

1.  Eco-geographic patterns of child malnutrition in India and its association with cereal cultivation: An analysis using demographic health survey and agriculture datasets.

Authors:  Rama Krishna Sanjeev; Prashanth Nuggehalli Srinivas; Bindu Krishnan; Yogish Channa Basappa; Akshay S Dinesh; Sabu K Ulahannan
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2022-02-22

2.  Impact of COVID-19 on child malnutrition, obesity in women and household food insecurity in underserved urban settlements in Sri Lanka: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Renuka Jayatissa; Himali P Herath; Amila G Perera; Thulasika T Dayaratne; Nawmali D De Alwis; Hiyare Palliyage Laksiri K Nanayakkara
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.022

3.  Household structure, maternal characteristics and children's stunting in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from 35 countries.

Authors:  Sanni Yaya; Olanrewaju Oladimeji; Emmanuel Kolawole Odusina; Ghose Bishwajit
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.131

4.  Multiple anthropometric and nutritional deficiencies in young children in Ethiopia: a multi-level analysis based on a nationally representative data.

Authors:  Nigatu Regassa Geda; Cindy Xin Feng; Carol J Henry; Rein Lepnurm; Bonnie Janzen; Susan J Whiting
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Assessment, outcomes and implications of multiple anthropometric deficits in children.

Authors:  Idzes Kundan; Rajalakshmi Nair; Shashwat Kulkarni; Aparna Deshpande; Raju Jotkar; Mrudula Phadke
Journal:  BMJ Nutr Prev Health       Date:  2021-06-07

6.  Severe acute malnutrition and mortality in children in the community: Comparison of indicators in a multi-country pooled analysis.

Authors:  Catherine Schwinger; Michael H Golden; Emmanuel Grellety; Dominique Roberfroid; Benjamin Guesdon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Anthropometric assessment of children's nutritional status: a new approach based on an adaptation of Waterlow's classification.

Authors:  Haroldo da Silva Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Mapping of variations in child stunting, wasting and underweight within the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 2000-2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-05-13

9.  Concurrently wasted and stunted 6-59 months children admitted to the outpatient therapeutic feeding programme in Karamoja, Uganda: Prevalence, characteristics, treatment outcomes and response.

Authors:  Gloria A Odei Obeng-Amoako; Henry Wamani; Joel Conkle; Richmond Aryeetey; Joanita Nangendo; Ezekiel Mupere; Joan N Kalyango; Mark Myatt; André Briend; Charles A S Karamagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Revisiting maternal and child undernutrition in low-income and middle-income countries: variable progress towards an unfinished agenda.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora; Parul Christian; Luis Paulo Vidaletti; Giovanna Gatica-Domínguez; Purnima Menon; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 202.731

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.