| Literature DB >> 30367556 |
Michel Garenne1,2,3,4, Mark Myatt5, Tanya Khara6, Carmel Dolan6, André Briend7,8.
Abstract
The study describes the patterns of concurrent wasting and stunting (WaSt) among children age 6-59 months living in the 1980s in Niakhar, a rural area of Senegal under demographic surveillance. Wasting and stunting were defined by z scores lower than -2 in weight for height and height for age. Both conditions were found to be highly prevalent, wasting more so before age 30 months, stunting more so after age 30 months. As a result, concurrent WaSt peaked around age 18 months and its prevalence (6.2%) was primarily the product of the two conditions, with an interaction term of 1.57 (p < 10-6 ). The interaction was due to the correlation between both conditions (more stunting if wasted, more wasting if stunted). Before age 30 months, boys were more likely to be concurrently wasted and stunted than girls (RR = 1.61), but the sex difference disappeared after 30 months of age. The excess susceptibility of younger boys could not be explained by muscle mass or fat mass measured by arm or muscle circumference, triceps, or subscapular skinfold. Concurrent WaSt was a strong risk factor for child mortality, and its effect was the product of the independent effect of each component, with no significant interaction.Entities:
Keywords: Senegal; anthropometry; child survival; concurrent wasting & stunting; stunting; wasting
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30367556 PMCID: PMC6587969 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Matern Child Nutr ISSN: 1740-8695 Impact factor: 3.092
Prevalence of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, by age group, Niakhar 1983–1984 (N = 12,638 measures)
| Prevalence (%) | Interaction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group (months) | Wasted (WHZ < −2) | Stunted (HAZ < −2) | Wasted and stunted | Value | 95% CI |
| (Wa) | (st) | (wast) | (wast/Wa × st) | Min‐max | |
| 6–11 | 19.9% | 10.6% | 4.5% | 2.16* | 1.62–2.87 |
| 12–23 | 29.5% | 26.0% | 11.0% | 1.44* | 1.25–1.66 |
| 24–35 | 18.2% | 32.4% | 9.1% | 1.54* | 1.29–1.82 |
| 36–47 | 7.2% | 26.3% | 3.6% | 1.91* | 1.49–2.45 |
| 48–59 | 6.9% | 20.7% | 1.7% | 1.21 | 0.86–1.69 |
| Total | 16.3% | 24.2% | 6.2% | 1.57* | 1.43–1.72 |
Note. Interaction terms were statistically significant (RR <> 1), with p values <10−6, except for the 48–59 age group (not significant). p values and confidence intervals calculated with standard formulae for risk ratios. (*) p < 0.05.
Figure 1Interactions between wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984. (a) Effect of wasting on stunting, (b) Effect of stunting on wasting
Net effect of stunting, age, and sex on wasting, Niakhar 1983–1984
| Variable | Children 6–29 months | Children 30–59 months | Difference between age groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B coefficient |
| B coefficient |
|
| |
| HAZ | −0.4435 | <10–6* | −0.3725 | <10–6* | 0.114 |
| Sex (male) | +0.1170 | 0.057 | −0.2240 | 0.015* | 0.002* |
| Age | +0.2094 | <10–6* | −0.3559 | <10–6* | <10–6* |
| Age2 | −0.0063 | <10–6* | +0.0039 | <10–6* | <10–6* |
| Constant | −3.1984 | <10–6* | +5.0068 | <10–6* | <10–6* |
Note. Dependent variable = proportion wasted (WHZ < −2); (*) p < 0.05. The net effect of each variable can be computed as = exp (bX). Age and age2 were used because the relationship with age was curvilinear. Sex = 1 for males, 0 for females.
Figure 2Prevalence by age of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984
Sex ratios of prevalence of wasting, stunting, and concurrent wasting and stunting, by age group, Niakhar 1983–1984
| Age group (months) | Sex ratio of prevalence (boys/girls) | Interaction | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wasted (WHZ < −2) | Stunted (HAZ < −2) | Wasted and stunted | Value | ||
| Sex ratio |
| ||||
| (Wa) | (st) | (wast) | (wast) | (wast/Wa × st) | |
| 6–12 | 1.23* | 1.82* | 2.34* | 7.5E‐04* | 1.04 |
| 12–24 | 1.20* | 1.35* | 1.69* | 5.3E‐06* | 1.04 |
| 24–36 | 1.01 | 1.24* | 1.17 | 0.230 | 0.93 |
| 36–48 | 0.77 | 1.12 | 0.82 | 0.329 | 0.96 |
| 48–60 | 0.84 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 0.677 | 0.91 |
| Total | 1.08 | 1.24 | 1.36* | 2.4E‐05* | 1.02 |
Note. (*) p < 0.05. p values test the sex ratio for wasting and stunting (SR <> 1). None of the sex ratio of the interactions was significant.
Figure 3Sex differences in prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984
Figure 4Effect of severity of concurrent wasting and stunting on sex differences in prevalence, Niakhar 1983–1984
Effect of age, sex, and anthropometric indicators on prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting, Niakhar 1983–1984
| Variable | Children age 6–29 | Children age 30–59 | Difference in coefficients | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient |
| Coefficient |
|
| |
| Age | +0.716 | <10–6* | −0.036 | 0.746 | <10–6* |
| Age2 | −0.014 | <10–6* | +0.001 | 0.628 | <10–6* |
| Sex (male) | +1.446 | <10–6* | +0.562 | 0.0020* | <10–4* |
| Head circumference | −0.055 | <10–6* | −0.053 | <10–6* | 0.814 |
| Tricipital | −0.038 | <10–6* | −0.041 | <10–6* | 0.755 |
| Subscapular | −0.018 | 0.0054* | −0.018 | 0.060 | 0.974 |
| Muscle circumference | −0.160 | <10–6* | −0.193 | <10–6* | 0.028 |
| Constant | 34.764 | <10–6* | 47.961 | <10–6* | |
Note. (*) p < 0.05. Dependent variable: prevalence of concurrent wasting and stunting (WHZ and HAZ < −2 z score). Head circumference and muscle arm circumference in mm. Triceps and subscapular skinfold in 10 × mm. Sex = 1 for males, 0 for females.
Effect of age, sex, stunting, wasting, and interaction on mortality, Niakhar 1983–1984
| Variable | Children age 6–29 months | Children age 30–59 months | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B coefficient |
| Net effect | B coefficient |
| Net effect | |
| Age | −0.0004 | 0.969 | −0.0339 | 0.027* | ||
| Sex | −0.0154 | 0.909 | −0.3785 | 0.126 | ||
| Stunting | −0.1378 | 0.150 | 1.31 | −0.4751 | 0.00007* | 2.57 |
| Wasting | −0.2608 | 0.004* | 1.66 | −0.0552 | 0.752 | 1.12 |
| Interaction | −0.0412 | 0.326 | 1.08 | −0.0714 | 0.288 | 1.15 |
| Constant | −3.8629 | <10−6* | −3.9151 | <10−6* | ||
Note. Net effect = relative risk of mortality associated with −2 z score; sex = 1 for males; stunting and wasting defined by dummy variables; (*) p < 0.05.
Figure 5Mortality according to the combined effect of stunting and wasting, Niakhar 1983–1984