Literature DB >> 30366887

Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Forceps and Vacuum Delivery at Outlet, Low, and Midpelvic Station.

Giulia M Muraca1, Yasser Sabr2, Sarka Lisonkova3, Amanda Skoll4, Rollin Brant5, Geoffrey W Cundiff4, K S Joseph3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to quantify perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality associated with forceps and vacuum delivery compared with Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour and to estimate whether these associations differed by pelvic station.
METHODS: The investigators conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study of term singleton deliveries by operative delivery with prolonged second stage of labour in Canada (2003-2013) using national hospitalization data. The primary study outcomes were severe perinatal morbidity and mortality (i.e., seizures, assisted ventilation, severe birth trauma, and perinatal death) and severe maternal morbidity and mortality (i.e., severe postpartum hemorrhage, cardiac complication, and maternal death). Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) after stratifying by indication (dystocia or fetal distress). The Breslow-Day chi-square test for heterogeneity in ORs was used to test effect modification by pelvic station (outlet, low, or midpelvic).
RESULTS: There were 61 106 deliveries included in the study. Among women with dystocia, forceps and vacuum deliveries were associated with higher rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with Caesarean delivery (forceps: aOR 1.56; 95% CI 1.13-2.17; vacuum: aOR 1.44; 95% CI 1.06-1.97). Vacuum delivery was associated with lower rates of maternal morbidity and mortality compared with Caesarean delivery (dystocia: aOR 0.64; 95% CI 0.51-0.81; fetal distress: aOR 0.43; 95% CI 0.32-0.57). Pelvic station did not significantly modify the associations between forceps or vacuum and perinatal or maternal morbidity and mortality.
CONCLUSION: Forceps and vacuum delivery is associated with increased rates of severe perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with Caesarean delivery among women with dystocia, whereas vacuum delivery is associated with decreased rates of severe maternal morbidity and mortality.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean delivery; Operative vaginal delivery; birth injury; forceps extraction; instrumental vaginal delivery; obstetric trauma; vacuum extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30366887     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can        ISSN: 1701-2163


  6 in total

1.  Perinatal outcome after vacuum assisted delivery with digital feedback on traction force; a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Stefhanie Romero; Kristina Pettersson; Khurram Yousaf; Magnus Westgren; Gunilla Ajne
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 2.  A scoping review of severe maternal morbidity: describing risk factors and methodological approaches to inform population-based surveillance.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Lisa A Nicholas; Samia Saeb; David J Reynen; Jennifer L Troyan; Naomi Greene; Moshe Fridman
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2021-01-06

3.  Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications.

Authors:  Meryam Sugulle; Erna Halldórsdóttir; Janne Kvile; Line Sissel Dahlgaard Berntzen; Anne Flem Jacobsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Amélie Boutin; Neda Razaz; Sarka Lisonkova; Sid John; Joseph Y Ting; Heather Scott; Michael S Kramer; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Clinical Effects of Form-Based Management of Forceps Delivery under Intelligent Medical Model.

Authors:  Siming Xin; Zhizhong Wang; Hua Lai; Lingzhi Liu; Ting Shen; Fangping Xu; Xiaoming Zeng; Jiusheng Zheng
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Can the cervical length in mid-trimester predict the use of vacuum in vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Jee Yoon Park; Sun Min Kim; Jeenah Sohn; Sejin Kim; Eunjin Song; Byoung Jae Kim; Hye Won Jeon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.