Literature DB >> 30366841

Gynaecologists' view on diagnostic delay and care performance in endometriosis in the Netherlands.

M van der Zanden1, M W J Arens2, D D M Braat2, W L M Nelen2, A W Nap3.   

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate implementation of the key recommendations of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) guidelines on endometriosis, and to assess factors influencing diagnostic delay of endometriosis from Dutch gynaecologists' point of view.
DESIGN: Questionnaire study among gynaecologists from all hospitals in the Netherlands. The questionnaire consisted of 56 questions relating to implementation of the ESHRE guidelines, organization of endometriosis care and diagnostic delay.
RESULTS: Gynaecologists from 67 out of 85 hospitals completed the questionnaire. A total of 99-100% of respondents agree with, and 91-100% adhere to, the diagnosis-related recommendations in the guidelines. Diagnostic delay is estimated at 42 months. Main factors contributing to diagnostic delay according to gynaecologists are lack of knowledge and awareness of endometriosis in both patients and medical professionals, as well as limitations in diagnostics and late referral. Suggested interventions to reduce diagnostic delay are aimed at improving knowledge and awareness in both patients and medical professionals, as well as improving collaborations between medical professionals.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall familiarity with, and use of, the 2014 ESHRE guidelines among Dutch gynaecologists is high. Dutch gynaecologists agree with the recommendations relating to diagnosis and adhere to them closely. Diagnostic delay, however, is still considerable; therefore, efforts to reduce diagnostic delay of endometriosis should be aimed at improving knowledge and awareness in both patients and medical professionals, as well as improving collaboration.
Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic delay; Endometriosis; Guideline adherence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30366841     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Prevalence of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Antonio Sarria-Santamera; Binur Orazumbekova; Milan Terzic; Alpamys Issanov; Chen Chaowen; Angel Asúnsolo-Del-Barco
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-30

2.  Endometriosis centers of expertise in the Netherlands: Development toward regional networks of multidisciplinary care.

Authors:  Laura de Kok; Nehalennia van Hanegem; Paul van Kesteren; Ellen Klinkert; Jacques Maas; Velja Mijatovic; Johann Rhemrev; Harold Verhoeve; Annemiek Nap
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-06

3.  The severity and frequency distribution of endometriosis subtypes at different ages: a model to understand the natural history of endometriosis based on single centre/single surgeon data.

Authors:  P R Koninckx; A Ussia; A Wattiez; L Adamyan; D C Martin; S Gordts
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-09

Review 4.  Endometriosis and Reproduction: What We Have Learned.

Authors:  Jaime Garcia-Fernandez; Juan A García-Velasco
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2020-09-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.