Literature DB >> 30366585

Evaluation of the preference, satisfaction and correct use of Breezhaler® and Respimat® inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - INHALATOR study.

Maria Vera Cruz de Oliveira1, Emilio Pizzichini2, Claudia Henrique da Costa3, Carlos Cezar Fritscher4, Elcio Oliveira Vianna5, Paulo José Zimermann Teixeira6, Roberto Stirbulov7, Marcelo Fouad Rabahi8, Nadine Cordeiro de Pinho9.   

Abstract

The INHALATOR study was a randomized, multicentre, open label, two-period of 7 days each, crossover study, with 7 days of washout in-between, aiming to evaluate the correct use, satisfaction and preference between Breezhaler® and Respimat® devices in patients under daily use of open Spiriva® or open Onbrize®, as monotherapy for treatment of mild or moderate COPD. Patients aged ≥40 years with a smoking history of at least 10 pack-year were included in the study. Primary endpoint was the rate of correct use of each device at the first day of treatment after reading the drug leaflet information and was evaluated under the supervision of a trained evaluator. At the end of each treatment phase, the inhaler use was re-evaluated and a satisfaction questionnaire was completed. The patients' preference for the inhaler devices was assessed at the end of the study. After exclusions due to screening failures, 140 patients were randomized: 136 received at least one dose of Breezhaler® and 135 of Respimat®. At treatment start, the rate of correct inhaler use was 40.4% (95%CI: 32.2%-48.7%) for Breezhaler® and 36.3% (95%CI: 28.2%-44.4%) for Respimat® (p = 0.451). After 7 days, the rates were 68.9% (95%CI: 61.1%-76.7%) and 60.4% (95%CI: 52.2%-68.7%), respectively (p = 0.077). According to the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler Questionnaire - FSI 10 patients were more satisfied using Breezhaler® than Respimat® and 57.1% preferred using Breezhaler® (p = 0.001) while 30.1% preferred Respimat® (p < 0.001).
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administration; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Inhaler device; Inhaler preference; Patient preference; Patient satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30366585     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  5 in total

1.  Technical Evaluation of Soft Mist Inhaler Use in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Lili Xu; Shen Gao; Nan Ding; Ping Shu; Zhuo Wang; Yuping Li
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2020-06-22

Review 2.  Inhaler Devices for Delivery of LABA/LAMA Fixed-Dose Combinations in Patients with COPD.

Authors:  Anthony D'Urzo; Kenneth R Chapman; James F Donohue; Peter Kardos; M Reza Maleki-Yazdi; David Price
Journal:  Pulm Ther       Date:  2019-03-13

3.  Device use errors with soft mist inhalers: A global systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Navaie; Carole Dembek; Soojin Cho-Reyes; Karen Yeh; Bartolome R Celli
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.444

4.  Inhaler device feature preferences among patients with obstructive lung diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maryam Navaie; Carole Dembek; Soojin Cho-Reyes; Karen Yeh; Bartolome R Celli
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  The Respimat® Soft Mist Inhaler: Implications of Drug Delivery Characteristics for Patients.

Authors:  Takashi Iwanaga; Yuji Tohda; Shuhei Nakamura; Yasunori Suga
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.859

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.