| Literature DB >> 30366380 |
Simón Villa-Arango1,2, David Betancur3, Róbinson Torres4, Panayiotis Kyriacou5.
Abstract
Phononic crystals are periodic composite structures with specific resonant features that are gaining popularity in the field as liquid sensors. The introduction of a structural defect in an otherwise periodic regular arrangement can generate a resonant mode, also called defect mode, inside the characteristic band gaps of phononic crystals. The morphology, as well as the frequency in which these defect modes appear, can give useful information on the composition and properties of an analyte. Currently, only gain and frequency measurements are performed using phononic crystal sensors. Other measurements like the transient response have been implemented in resonant sensors such as quartz microbalances showing great results and proving to be a great complimentary measure to the gain and frequency measurements. In the present paper, a study of the feasibility of using the transient response as a measure to acquire additional information about the analyte is presented. Theoretical studies using the transmission line model were realized to show the impact of variations in the concentration of an analyte, in this case, lithium carbonate solutions, in the transient time of the system. Experimental realizations were also performed showing that the proposed measurement scheme presents significant changes in the resulting data, indicating the potential use of this measure in phononic crystal sensors. This proposed measure could be implemented as a stand-alone measure or as a compliment to current sensing modalities.Entities:
Keywords: phononic crystal sensors; resonant sensors; transient response
Year: 2018 PMID: 30366380 PMCID: PMC6263472 DOI: 10.3390/s18113618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Properties of the layers.
| Layer Number | Material | Speed of Sound (m/s) | Density (Kg/m3) | Thickness (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PZT | 3333 | 7500 | - |
| 2 | Glass | 2200 | 5720 | 1.25 |
| 3 | Water | 998 | 1493 | 1.25 |
| 4 | Glass | 2200 | 5720 | 1 |
| 5 | Analyte | 2.5 | ||
| 6 | Glass | 2200 | 5720 | 1 |
| 7 | Water | 998 | 1493 | 1.25 |
| 8 | Glass | 2200 | 5720 | 1.25 |
| 9 | PZT | 3333 | 7500 | - |
The layer thickness of the PZT layers is considered as semi-infinite for the simulation.
Figure 1Phononic crystal structure representation.
Figure 2Phononic crystal sensor used for the experimental realizations.
Figure 3Simulated frequency response of the phononic crystal sensor.
Lithium carbonate solutions.
| Solution # | Concentration (g/mL) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.00025 |
| 3 | 0.00125 |
| 4 | 0.0025 |
| 5 | 0.0075 |
| 6 | 0.01125 |
Figure 4Experimental results of the phononic crystal sensor using distilled water (solid line) and a lithium carbonate solution with a concentration of 0.01125 g/mL (dashed line).
Figure 5Zoomed-in experimental results of the phononic crystal sensor using distilled water (black dashed and dotted line), and lithium carbonate solutions with a concentration of 0.01125 g/mL (gray solid line) and 0.0025 g/mL (gray dashed line).
Figure 6Transient time experimental results of the phononic crystal sensor using distilled water (dashed and dotted line), and lithium carbonate solutions with a concentration of 0.01125 g/mL (solid line) and 0.0025 g/mL (dashed line).
Decay time at different concentration values.
| Concentration (g/mL) | Time (s) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0.008750 |
| 0.00025 | 0.008125 |
| 0.00125 | 0.006250 |
| 0.0025 | 0.004375 |
| 0.0075 | 0.002500 |
| 0.01125 | 0.001875 |
Figure 7Relationship between the concentration of the lithium carbonate solution used as the analyte and the decay time obtained.