Literature DB >> 30365952

Clinical Outcomes of Mitral Valve Reoperations in the United States: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Arman Kilic1, Michael A Acker2, Thomas G Gleason3, Ibrahim Sultan3, Sreekanth Vemulapalli4, Dylan Thibault4, Gorav Ailawadi5, Vinay Badhwar6, Vinod Thourani7, Ahmet Kilic8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated outcomes of reoperative mitral valve surgery (MVS) in the United States.
METHODS: Adults undergoing isolated MVS with prior open-heart operation in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database between July 2011 and September 2016 were included. Urgent or emergent operations as well as all indications and causes for MVS were included. Primary outcomes were operative mortality and morbidity. Multivariable models were used for risk-adjustment, incorporating variables from the STS Valve Risk Model as well as type of prior operation and reoperative approach.
RESULTS: A total of 17,195 patients underwent isolated reoperative MVS at 962 centers. The STS predicted risk of mortality was 8.0%, with 20% having an STS predicted risk of mortality greater than 10%. Prior cardiac operations included previous MVS (61%), coronary artery bypass (39%), aortic valve surgery (18%), and tricuspid valve surgery (6%). Operative mortality for the overall study cohort was 6.6%, and postoperative stroke occurred in 2.4%. Observed-to-expected mortality for the overall cohort was 0.82. The strongest independent predictors of operative mortality included salvage operation, preoperative dialysis dependence, congestive heart failure, recent myocardial infarction, and active endocarditis. Prior aortic valve replacement was associated with increased mortality risk, whereas prior MVS reduced mortality risk. Surgical approach did not affect mortality. For patients with prior MVS undergoing elective, non-endocarditis operations, the operative mortality was 3.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high-risk patient profile, surgical outcomes of reoperative MVS were acceptable, particularly in patients with prior MVS and without endocarditis undergoing elective operations.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30365952     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation in patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses or failed ring annuloplasty.

Authors:  Alina Zubarevich; Marcin Szczechowicz; Konstantin Zhigalov; Philipp Marx; Alexander Lind; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Tienush Rassaf; Sharaf-Eldin Shehada; Rizwan Malik; Markus Kamler; Matthias Thielmann; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar; Alexander Weymann; Daniel Wendt
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

2.  Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantations Using Inverted J-Valve.

Authors:  Lulu Liu; Bowen Xiao; Binggang Wu; Yingqiang Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  Robotic mitral valve surgery after prior sternotomy.

Authors:  Talia G Meidan; Allison T Lanfear; John J Squiers; Mohanad Hamandi; Bruce W Lytle; J Michael DiMaio; Robert L Smith
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-02-24

4.  One-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Using the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Authors:  Brian Whisenant; Samir R Kapadia; Mackram F Eleid; Susheel K Kodali; James M McCabe; Amar Krishnaswamy; Michael Morse; Richard W Smalling; Mark Reisman; Michael Mack; William W O'Neill; Vinayak N Bapat; Martin B Leon; Charanjit S Rihal; Raj R Makkar; Mayra Guerrero
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

5.  Reoperative Mitral Surgery Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aditya Sengupta; Farhang Yazdchi; Sophia L Alexis; Edward Percy; Akash Premkumar; Sameer Hirji; Vinayak N Bapat; Deepak L Bhatt; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Gilbert H L Tang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Mitral surgical redo versus transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation.

Authors:  Alina Zubarevich; Marcin Szczechowicz; Arian Arjomandi Rad; Robert Vardanyan; Philipp Marx; Alexander Lind; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Mehdy Roosta-Azad; Rizwan Malik; Markus Kamler; Matthias Thielmann; Mohamed El Gabry; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar; Alexander Weymann; Daniel Wendt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Redo Surgical Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Transcatheter Mitral Valve in Valve From the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Muhammad Zia Khan; Salman Zahid; Muhammad U Khan; Asim Kichloo; Shakeel Jamal; Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas; Waqas Ullah; Yasar Sattar; Sudarshan Balla
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Redo Cardiac Surgery Using Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Can Zhao; Yuntao Li; Guangyu Pan; Jianping Xu; Shen Liu; Yaqiong Xiao
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-07-29

9.  Clinical and Surgical Evaluations of Reoperation After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement Due to Different Etiologies.

Authors:  Jiehui Li; Shuiyun Wang; Hansong Sun; Jianping Xu; Chao Dong; Min Song; Qibin Yu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-17

10.  Commentary: Adding endovascular techniques to the surgical toolbox.

Authors:  James A Brown; Ibrahim Sultan
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-06-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.