Literature DB >> 30365530

Poor treatment outcomes and its determinants among tuberculosis patients in selected health facilities in East Wollega, Western Ethiopia.

Abrham Belachew Muluye1, Selamu Kebamo1, Tesfa Teklie1, Getachew Alemkere1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it is a preventable and treatable disease, tuberculosis remains a major medical and public health problem throughout the world. The control and elimination of tuberculosis is currently challenged by the development and spread of antituberculosis drug resistance. The resistance is often correlated to the absence of properly implemented control measures that lead to poor treatment outcomes. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to assess poor treatment outcomes and its determinants among tuberculosis patients in selected health facilities in East Wollega zone, Western Ethiopia.
METHOD: A five-year retrospective cross-sectional study design was employed. Data were collected from patients' medical record from January to March 2017. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics were used to generate and summarize frequencies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to associate the potential determinants of poor treatment outcomes.
RESULTS: From 995 patients with documented treatment outcomes, 58.9% were males with a mean age of 31.9±16.3 years and 58% lived in rural areas. Majorities of cases (95.7%) were newly treated ones. Nearly half of the cases had extrapulmonary tuberculosis and 6.8% were co-infected with HIV. Nearly three-quarter of patients had completed their treatment while 17.2%, 2.9%, 4.8%, 0.4% patients were cured, defaulted, died, and failed, respectively. The overall treatment success rate was 91.9%. Being treated in Anger Gute health center (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18-4.38); male (AOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.06-3.10); lived in rural areas (AOR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.02-2.91); previously treated (AOR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.16-6.39) and unknown HIV status (AOR: 4.56; 95% CI: 1.98-10.50) were determinants of poor treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSION: The current treatment success rate was exceeded the recommended target. However, special attention and strict follow up is required for tuberculosis patients with high risk of unsuccessful treatment outcomes including male, rural resident, previously treated and unknown in HIV status patients throughout their treatment periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30365530      PMCID: PMC6203372          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Infectious diseases are major causes of morbidity, mortality and poverty throughout the developing countries. Among these diseases, tuberculosis (TB) is an ancient and re-emergent bacterial disease that affects both humans and animals. It is mainly caused by the bacillus Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The bacteria infects about one third of the global population. It typically affects the pulmonary system (pulmonary TB) and occasionally any other anatomic site (extrapulmonary TB) of the body. The disease is mainly transmitted by inhaling droplet aerosols from lungs with active lung disease [1-4]. In 2016, tuberculosis was the ninth leading cause of global deaths. It was a number one killer from a single infectious disease. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is the common risk for re-activation of the latent disease. More than 1.67 million TB deaths were estimated in 2016 around the world. Most of the deaths (78%) were in HIV-positive cases. About 10.4 million TB cases were reported and most of the cases were in Africa including Ethiopia (74%). Ethiopia was ranked as 10th among the 22 high-TB-burden, 26th among the high multidrug resistant-TB-burden, and 13th among the 41 high-TB/HIV-burden countries in the world [1,5,6]. Weakness, weight loss, fever, sweating, cough, and swellings are among the clinical manifestations of tuberculosis. It is a curable and preventable infectious disease. Early diagnosis, effective treatment and timely identification of rifampin resistance are crucial for controlling and eventual elimination of the disease. It is diagnosed by rapid molecular tests, sputum smear microscopy and culture-based methods [4,7]. The control and elimination of TB is currently challenged by the development and spread of microbial resistance to effective, cheap and safe antibiotics. Anti-TB drug resistance is a major medical and public health concern in both developed and developing nations. About 600,000 new TB cases were developed resistance to rifampicin of which 82% had multidrug-resistant TB in 2016. Drug-resistant bacilli strains pose a major risk to the health of every one. It requires longer, complex, expensive and toxic treatment options. In addition, the treatment success rate is much lower. Inadequate dosing and incomplete regimens as well as the ability of the bacilli to develop resistance have fueled the rise of multidrug-resistant TB [1,6,8-13]. High resistance rates of TB are often correlated to the absence of properly implemented control programs including directly observed treatment, short course (DOTS) schemes. In 1994, the DOTS strategy used to control TB was launched by World Health Organization (WHO). The strategy was aimed to detect 70% of infectious cases and cure 85% of them. This was expected to interrupt disease transmission and reduce the number and period of infectiousness. Ethiopia implemented DOTS strategy as pilot programmes in Arsi and Bale zones since 1997. Currently, the DOTS strategy has been subsequently scaled up throughout the country and implemented at national level [4,14,15]. The performance of TB control program is measured by its treatment outcomes as recommended by WHO in 2013. Five exclusive categories of TB treatment outcomes including cured, treatment completed, treatment failed, died and defaulted were used as a standard for global TB data collection and assessment of its treatment performance. The percentage of TB cases that were cured and completed treatment collectively had successful treatment outcome while those with failed treatment, defaulted and died had unsuccessful treatment outcome out of all. Monitoring the treatment outcome of TB is indispensable to appraise the effectiveness and improvement of its intervention and to identify potential barriers for its control [14,16]. However, the performances of TB control program as well as its treatment outcomes have not yet studied in three health centers in East Wollega Zone, Western Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to assess poor treatment outcomes and its determinants among TB patients in selected health facilities in East Wollega zone, Western Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Study area and periods

The study was conducted in three health facilities (Uke health center, Anger Gute health center and Sibu Sire health center) in East Wollega zone, Oromia regional state, Western Ethiopia. These health facilities were purposively selected. The people lived in these areas are highly mobile because the area is the main center for agricultural productivity of the country. Such practices might have a negative impact on TB treatment outcomes. The data was collected from January to March 2017.

Study design

A five-year retrospective cross-sectional study design was employed to extract the required data from TB patient medical records in the aforementioned health institutions.

Population

Source population

The source population was all TB patients who were treated with anti-TB drugs in the aforementioned health centers.

Study population

The study population was all TB patients who were treated with anti-TB drugs from 2012 to 2016 and had treatment outcomes in the aforementioned health centers and fulfilled the selection criteria.

Variables

The dependent variable was treatment outcome (successful/unsuccessful) while the independent variables were socio-demographic characteristics (sex, age, weight and residence) and clinical characteristics (type of TB, treatment history and HIV status).

Selection criteria

All TB cases that were registered and treated with anti-TB drugs from 2012 to 2016 and had treatment outcomes were included in the study, whereas registries with missed treatment outcomes, incomplete patient characteristics, and transferred out cases were excluded from the study.

Data collection

Patient data, including year of treatment, age, sex, weight, residence, TB type, HIV status, treatment history, and treatment outcomes, were extracted from TB patient medical records using a well-structured checklist. Data were collected by experienced nursing staffs working in each TB treatment unit. Data collectors were trained and collected under the strict supervision by the principal investigators.

Data analysis

Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics was used to generate and summarize frequencies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to associate the potential determinants of poor treatment outcomes.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained by ethical approval committee (members were Worku Dechassa, Hylemariam Mihretie, Getu Bayissa, and Biniam Paulos) of College of Health Sciences, Wollega University. Letter of permission was written to East Wollega Zone Health Office and to the respective health center administrators to access patients’ data. All data were fully anonymized before access by the researchers. Confidentiality was kept throughout the study. The collected data were used for the intended purpose only.

Operational definitions

The following term/s used in the study were operationally defined according to: Cured. A pulmonary TB patient with bacteriologically confirmed TB at the beginning of treatment who was smear- or culture-negative in the last month of treatment and on at least one previous occasion. Treatment completed. A TB patient who completed treatment without evidence of failure but with no record to show that sputum smear or culture results in the last month of treatment and on at least one previous occasion were negative, either because tests were not done or because results are unavailable. Treatment failed. A TB patient whose sputum smear or culture is positive at month 5 or later during treatment. Defaulted. A TB patient whose treatment was interrupted for two consecutive months or more. Died. A TB patient who dies for any reason before starting or during the course of treatment. Treatment success. The sum of cured and treatment completed. Treatment un-success. The sum of treatment failed, defaulted and died. New TB patients have not previously been treated for TB and are now diagnosed and started the current treatment. Retreated TB patients have previously been treated for TB and are now diagnosed and started the current treatment with a recurrent episode of TB.

Results

Demographic characteristics

During the five-year treatment periods, only 995 TB patients had documented treatment outcomes. Majorities of these patients were males (58.9%), within the age group of 25 to 34 years (25.4%), below the average weight (54.2%) and lived in rural areas (58%) as shown in Table 1. The case incidence of the disease was increased from 2012 to 2014 and decreased from 2014 to 2015 and increased from 2015 to 2016 enrollment years (Fig 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of TB patients at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

CharacteristicsFrequencyPercent
Center of treatmentSibu Sire health center39139.3
Anger Gute health center36336.
Uke health center24124.2
SexMale58658.9
Female40941.1
Age (in years)0–1412112.2
15–2422022.1
25–3425325.4
35–4414915.0
45–5414314.4
55–64696.9
≥65404.0
Mean±SD*31.9±16.3
Weight (in kg)<45.253954.2
≥45.245645.8
Mean±SD*45.2±12.5
ResidenceRural57758.0
Urban41842.0

*SD, standard deviation.

Fig 1

The case incidence of TB patients in three health centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.HC,health center.

*SD, standard deviation.

Clinical characteristics

From 995 cases, most of the patients (95.7%) were new TB patients and 6.8% were co-infected with HIV. The predominant form of TB was extrapulmonary TB (43.1%) as shown in Table 2. The trends of various types of TB were summarized in (Fig 2).
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of TB patients at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

CharacteristicsFrequencyPercent
Treatment historyNew95295.7
Re-treated383.8
Unknown50.5
HIV statusPositive686.8
Negative88989.3
Unknown383.8
Tuberculosis type*SPPTB20220.3
SNPTB36436.6
EPTB42943.1

*SPPTB, sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis; SNPTB, sputum negative pulmonary tuberculosis; EPTB, extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

Fig 2

Trends of TB at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

SPPTB,sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis; SNPTB,sputum negative pulmonary tuberculosis; EPTB,extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

Trends of TB at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

SPPTB,sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis; SNPTB,sputum negative pulmonary tuberculosis; EPTB,extrapulmonary tuberculosis. *SPPTB, sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis; SNPTB, sputum negative pulmonary tuberculosis; EPTB, extrapulmonary tuberculosis.

Treatment outcomes

Nearly three-fourth of TB patients (743, 74.7%) had completed their treatment while 171 (17.2%) patients were cured. Twenty nine (2.9%), 48 (4.8%), and 4 (0.4%) patients were defaulted, died, and treatment failed, respectively (Fig 3).
Fig 3

Treatment outcomes of TB patients at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

The overall treatment success rate was 91.9%. Treatment success rate was varied across treatment centers. Higher success rate was observed in Uke health center followed by Sibu Sire and Anger Gute health centers (P = 0.011) (Fig 4). Treatment success rate was higher in female patients (94.1%) compared to males (90.3%) (P = 0.029); urban residents (94%) compared to rural ones (90.3%) (P = 0.034); new TB cases (92.3%) compared with retreated ones (81.6%) (P = 0.037); and HIV-negative patients (92.8%) compared with HIV-positive (88.2%) and unknown status (76.3%) (P = 0.001).
Fig 4

Treatment success outcomes of TB patients at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

The overall death rate was 4.8%. The death rate was higher in Anger Gute health center (6.6%) compared to Uke health center (2.5%) (P = 0.014); older age (7.7%) compared to age of 25 to 34 years (3.6%) (P = 0.024); male cases (5.8%) compared to females (3.4%) (P = 0.042); retreated cases (10.5%) compared to new cases (4.6%) (P = 0.012); and smear-negative pulmonary TB cases (5.5%) compared to smear-positive ones (3.5%) (P = 0.000). The overall defaulter rate was 2.9%. The defaulter rate was higher in Anger Gute health center (4.7%) compared to Sibu Sire health center (1.3%) (P = 0.014); older age (8.7%) compared to age of 25 to 34 years (2%) (P = 0.024); male cases (3.4%) compared to females (2.2%) (P = 0.042); retreated cases (5.3%) compared to new cases (2.7%) (P = 0.012); and smear-negative pulmonary TB cases (4.4%) compared to smear-positives (1%) (P = 0.000). The overall treatment failure rate was 0.4%. The failure rate was higher in male cases (0.5%) compared to females (0.2%) (P = 0.042); retreated cases (2.6%) compared to new cases (0.3%) (P = 0.012); and HIV-negative TB cases (0.4%) compared to HIV-positive ones (0%) (P = 0.005).

Trends in treatment outcomes

The trend in treatment success rate of all TB patients increased from 93.4% in 2012 to 96.7% in 2013 then steadily decreased to 87.3% from 2014 to 2015 and then increased to 89.2% in 2016 (Fig 5).
Fig 5

Trends of treatment success rates of TB patients at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

The death rate decreased from 3.6% in 2012 to 2.9% in 2013 then increased from 3.2% to 7.7% from 2014 to 2015 and again decreased to 6.4% in 2016. The defaulter rate decreased from 3% in 2012 to 0.5% in 2013 then increased to 4.4% from 2014 to 2015 and again decreased into 3.2% in 2016. Treatment failure rate increased from 0.6% in 2015 to 1.2% in 2016. Generally, unfavorable treatment success rate were increased between 2013 and 2015 but started to fall after 2016 (Fig 6).
Fig 6

Trends of treatment unsuccessful rates of TB patients at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

Determinants of unsuccessful treatment outcomes

Tuberculosis patients who were treated in Anger Gute health center (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.27; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.18–4.38; P = 0.015); male (AOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.06–3.10; P = 0.031); lived in rural areas (AOR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.02–2.91; P = 0.041); previously treated (AOR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.16–6.39; P = 0.022); and unknown status in HIV co-infection (AOR: 4.56; 95% CI: 1.98–10.50; P = 0.000) were at higher risk of unsuccessful treatment outcomes while years of enrollment, age, weight, and tuberculosis type were not determinants of unsuccessful treatment outcomes as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Socio-demographic and clinical variables associated with unsuccessful treatment outcome at three TB treatment centers in East Wollega from 2012 to 2016.

VariablesTreatment outcomesCrude OR [95% CI]Adjusted OR [95% CI]
Successful (%)Unsuccessful (%)
Treatment centerUke health center227 (22.8)14 (1.4)11
Sibu Sire health center366 (36.8)25 (2.5)1.11 [0.56–2.18]1.30 [0.64–2.64]
Anger Gute health center321 (32.3)42 (4.2)2.12 [1.13–3.98]*2.27 [1.18–4.38]*
Age group (years)0–14110 (11.1)11 (1.1)1.59 [0.71–3.57]1.65 [0.67–4.10]
15–24204 (20.5)16 (1.6)1.24 [0.60–2.58]1.21[0.57–2.54]
25–34238 (23.9)15 (1.5)11
35–44138 (13.9)11 (1.1)1.27 [0.57–2.83]1.10 [0.48–2.53]
45–54129 (13.0)14 (1.4)1.72 [0.81–3.68]1.19 [0.53–2.66]
55–6460 (6.0)9 (0.9)2.38 [0.99–5.70]1.76 [0.70–4.38]
≥6535 (3.5)5 (0.5)2.27 [0.78–6.63]1.53 [0.49–4.77]
Weight (kg)<Average weight494 (49.6)45 (4.5)0.94 [0.60–1.49]1.01 [0.58–1.56]
≥Average weight420 (42.2)36 (3.6)11
SexMale529 (53.2)57 (5.7)1.73 [1.05–2.84]*1.81 [1.06–3.10]*
Female385 (38.7)24 (2.4)11
ResidenceUrban393 (39.5)25 (2.5)11
Rural521 (52.4)56 (5.6)1.69 [1.04–2.76]*1.73 [1.02–2.91]*
Treatment historyNew879 (88.3)73 (7.3)11
Retreated31 (3.1)7 (0.7)2.72 [1.16–6.39]*2.43 [0.96–6.19]
Unknown4 (0.4)1 (0.1)3.01 [0.33–27.28]3.37 [0.35–32.79]
TB typeSmear-positive189 (19.0)13 (1.3)11
Smear-negative328 (33.0)36 (3.6)1.60 [0.83–3.08]1.41 [0.70–2.83]
Extrapulmonary397 (39.9)32 (3.2)1.17 [0.60–2.28]1.09 [0.54–2.23]
HIV statusNegative825 (82.9)64 (6.4)11
Positive60 (6.0)8 (0.8)1.72 [0.79–3.75]1.16 [0.95–4.90]
Unknown29 (2.9)9 (0.9)4.00 [1.82–8.81]*4.56 [1.98–10.50]*

*P-value< 0.05.

*P-value< 0.05.

Discussion

The implementation and expansion of DOTS strategy have been substantially improved the success rate of TB treatment outcomes. However, the strategy is being challenged by poor treatment outcomes especially in low and middle-income countries. Therefore, routine monitoring of TB treatment performances and analysis of determinants responsible for poor treatment outcomes are vital to prevent further adverse outcomes. Of 995 patients with documented treatment outcomes, more than half of them (58.9%) were males. This was similar with reports by WHO [1] and in southern Ethiopia [17]. This might be due to biological differences, difference in societal roles and access to health facilities. Majority of TB cases were within productive age groups (83.8%), which was comparable with other reports in southern Ethiopia [17] and central Ethiopia [18]. This might reflect the negative impact of the disease on socio-economic condition of the society. Extrapulmonary TB constituted the common form of TB which was in line with other report in central Ethiopia [18]. The overall treatment success rate was 91.9%, which was exceeded to the WHO target [1]. This was comparable to other findings in northeast Ethiopia (90.1%) [19] and Northwest Ethiopia (94%, 94.4%) [20,21]. But the current finding was higher than with other reports in north Ethiopia (60.1%, 79.3%) [22,23], south Ethiopia (74%) [17], northwest Ethiopia (80.5%, 87.8%) [24,25], central Ethiopia (82.7%, 83.6%) [18,26] and east Ethiopia (83.9%) [27]. This disagreement might be differences in handling of transfer out cases, socio-economic characteristics of patients, geographic setting, sample size, study period, HIV co-infection, DOTS performance, and coordination of HIV and TB activities. However, a declining trend of treatment success rate was observed over the treatment periods. Treatment success rate was significantly varied across treatment centers. Unfavorable treatment outcome was observed in Anger Gute health center than others (AOR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.18–4.38; P = 0.015). Similar treatment success variation across treatment centers also reported in central Ethiopia [18] and east Ethiopia [26]. The possible reasons might be differences in human resources and their productivity, workload and heterogeneity of service provision. Male patients were more likely to have poor treatment outcome when compared to females (AOR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.06–3.10; P = 0.031). A similar finding was reported elsewhere in north Ethiopia [28], northwest Ethiopia [29], southern Ethiopia [30] and worldwide [31]. Being highly exposed to cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption and HIV prevalence and travelling a long distance for economic reasons might contribute to poor treatment success rate in men. Patients from rural areas were more likely to have poor treatment outcome than urban dwellers (AOR = 1.173; 95% CI: 1.02–2.91; P = 0.041). This was in agreement with other reports elsewhere in northwest Ethiopia [32,33], southern Ethiopia [30] and southwest Ethiopia [34]. Lower awareness and information about TB, HIV and their treatments, long distance between their homes and treatment centers, fear of stigma and discrimination, and poor socio-economic status might contribute to lower treatment success rate in rural patients. Previously treated patients were more likely to have poor treatment outcome than newly treated ones (AOR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.16–6.39; P = 0.022). This was in line with previous reports in northwest Ethiopia [22,29], east Ethiopia [26], central Ethiopia [30] and southwest Ethiopia [34]. Prior suboptimal therapy, poor compliance and high prevalence of multidrug resistant-TB might contribute the observed variation. Due to limited access to culture and drug sensitivity test services in Ethiopia, the extent of multidrug resistant-TB among re-treatment cases are mostly unknown. Being unknown status about HIV-coinfection had also increased the risk of unsuccessful treatment outcome (AOR: 4.56; 95% CI: 1.98–10.50; P = 0.000). A similar finding was reported in northwest Ethiopia [22,24] and central Ethiopia [30]. The possible reason could be if these patients were HIV positive and not initiate antiretroviral therapy timely, the consequence were bad and contributory factor for unsuccessful treatment outcome. Other comorbidities such as diabetes and chronic conditions might be the other contributory reasons. More than half of patients with unsuccessful treatment outcomes (58.5%) were died. This was in line with other reports in east Ethiopia [27] and south Ethiopia [35] but lower than previous studies [17,26,32] in Ethiopia. Re-treated patients (10.5%) were more likely to die than newer patients (4.6%). Patients of unknown HIV status (10.5%) were more likely to die than HIV negative cases (4.5%). Patients lived in rural areas (5.9%) were also more likely to die than urban residents (3.3%). The overall defaulter rate was 1.6% which was lower than a target recommended by WHO (≤3%) [36]. The current finding was similar to a report in northeast Ethiopia [19] but much lower than other findings [17,23,26,32,35,37,38] in Ethiopia. However, there was still a defaulter rate variation across the study settings and treatment periods. Previously retreated patients (5.3%) were more likely to default than newer cases (2.7%). Patients of unknown HIV co-infection status (13.2%) were more likely to default than HIV negative cases (2.5%). This was in agreement with a report in northeast Ethiopia [19]. The overall treatment failure rate was 0.5% which was comparable with other studies [18,20,23,27,29,32,35] but lower than others [19,20,26,37] in Ethiopia. Retreated patients (2.6%) were more likely to fail than new cases (0.3%). Previous exposure to anti-TB drugs might increase the risk of developing multidrug resistant-TB. Hence, strengthening the capacity of TB diagnostic facilities for early detection and management of multidrug resistant-TB cases is important.

Limitation of the study

The major limitation of the study was related to the use of secondary data. We have not had access to the full range of the socio-demographic, socio-economic and clinical variables including alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and comorbidity in the medical records during the review process. The historical data used in this study was originally collected primarily for reporting purposes. The weakness of this type of data is well known, especially, in low income countries, where the qualities of reports are often poor. In addition, data analysis from retrospective reviews of patient records might affect the validity of the result.

Conclusion

Tuberculosis treatment success rate was exceeded the 90% treatment success rate target as set by WHO. However, the success rate was consistently varied across the study settings and treatment periods. It was consecutively declined with treatment periods. Special attention is therefore required for patients with high risk of unsuccessful treatment outcome including those patients treated in Anger Gute health centre, came from rural areas, treated again and with unknown HIV status need strict follow up throughout their treatment periods. Supportive supervision should be initiated and strengthened to maintain the high treatment success rate as well as to reverse the current declining treatment success rate of tuberculosis.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of tuberculosis patients treated from 2012 to 2016 in three health facilities in East Wollega, Western Ethiopia.

UHC, Uke health center; SSHC, Sibu Sire health center; AGHC, Anger Gute health center; M, male; F, female; U, urban; R, rural; RT, Re-treated; SP, smear-positive; SN, smear-negative; EP, extrapulmonary; P, positive, N, negative; NA, not applicable, NE, not evaluated; NT, not tested; C, cured; CT, completed treatment; D, defaulted; Di, died. (PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  20 in total

1.  Tuberculosis: 1. Introduction.

Authors:  A Fanning
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  S K Sharma; A Mohan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Current Affairs, Future Perspectives of Tuberculosis and Antitubercular Agents.

Authors:  Jineetkumar Gawad; Chandrakant Bonde
Journal:  Indian J Tuberc       Date:  2017-08-14

4.  Adherence to Anti-tuberculosis treatment and treatment outcomes among tuberculosis patients in Alamata District, northeast Ethiopia.

Authors:  Gebrehiwet Tesfahuneygn; Girmay Medhin; Mengistu Legesse
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-09-29

5.  A retrospective study on tuberculosis treatment outcomes at Jinka General Hospital, southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Biniam Wondale; Girmay Medihn; Takele Teklu; Wondmeneh Mersha; Mesfin Tamirat; Gobena Ameni
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-12-04

6.  Social support a key factor for adherence to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment.

Authors:  R D Deshmukh; D J Dhande; K S Sachdeva; A N Sreenivas; A M V Kumar; M Parmar
Journal:  Indian J Tuberc       Date:  2017-06-02

7.  Treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients at enfraz health center, northwest ethiopia: a five-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Mengistu Endris; Feleke Moges; Yeshambel Belyhun; Eleni Woldehana; Ahmed Esmael; Chandrashekhar Unakal
Journal:  Tuberc Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-05

Review 8.  The ongoing challenge of latent tuberculosis.

Authors:  H Esmail; C E Barry; D B Young; R J Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Treatment Outcomes of Tuberculosis Patients at Debre Berhan Hospital, Amhara Region, Northern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Firdie Tefera; Tariku Dejene; Tsegaye Tewelde
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2016-01

10.  Treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients under directly observed treatment in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Belete Getahun; Gobena Ameni; Girmay Medhin; Sibhatu Biadgilign
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.257

View more
  10 in total

1.  Drug-susceptible tuberculosis treatment outcomes and its associated factors among inmates in prison settings in Bauchi State, Nigeria, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Peter Okpeh Amede; Elizabeth Adedire; Aishat Usman; Celestine Attah Ameh; Faruk Saleh Umar; Chukwuma David Umeokonkwo; Muhammad Shakir Balogun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Unknown HIV status and the TB/HIV collaborative control program in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Balew Arega; Abraham Minda; Getachew Mengistu; Mulugeta Endale; Asnake Agunie
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Determinants of tuberculosis treatment outcome under directly observed treatment short courses in Adama City, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tariku Tesema; Dejene Seyoum; Eyasu Ejeta; Reta Tsegaye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Knowledge on tuberculosis and utilization of DOTS service by tuberculosis patients in Lalitpur District, Nepal.

Authors:  Nirmal Gautam; Rewati Raj Karki; Rasheda Khanam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Tuberculosis Treatment Outcome and Predictors in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Melese Yeshambaw Teferi; Ziad El-Khatib; Minyahil Tadesse Boltena; Azeb Tarekegn Andualem; Benedict Oppong Asamoah; Mulatu Biru; Hawult Taye Adane
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Assessment of Factors Associated with Unfavorable Outcomes among Drug-Resistant TB Patients: A 6-Year Retrospective Study from Pakistan.

Authors:  Farman Ullah Khan; Asim Ur Rehman; Faiz Ullah Khan; Khezar Hayat; Amjad Khan; Nafees Ahmad; Jie Chang; Usman Rashid Malik; Yu Fang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Tuberculosis poor treatment outcomes and its determinants in Kilifi County, Kenya: a retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2019.

Authors:  Geoffrey G Katana; Moses Ngari; Teresia Maina; Deche Sanga; Osman A Abdullahi
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-02-05

8.  Determinants of unsuccessful tuberculosis treatment outcome in Northern Red Sea region, Eritrea.

Authors:  Zenawi Zeramariam Araia; Fitsum Kibreab; Abiel Abraham Kibrom; Amanuel Hadgu Mebrahtu; Michael Goitom Girmatsion; Yonatan Woldu Teklehiwet; Araia Berhane Mesfin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Factors predictive of the success of tuberculosis treatment: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ninfa Marlen Chaves Torres; Jecxy Julieth Quijano Rodríguez; Pablo Sebastián Porras Andrade; María Belen Arriaga; Eduardo Martins Netto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of first-line tuberculosis treatment outcomes between previously treated and new patients: a retrospective study in Machakos subcounty, Kenya.

Authors:  Johannes Ndambuki; Joseph Nzomo; Lucy Muregi; Chris Mutuku; Francis Makokha; Jonathan Nthusi; Clarice Ambale; Lutgarde Lynen; Tom Decroo
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.473

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.