| Literature DB >> 30365517 |
Franz Korbinian Huetter1, Peter Alexander Horn2, Winfried Siffert1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In a recent study, we found associations of a common oxytocin receptor (OXTR) polymorphism with inter-individual differences in empathy, especially with emotional empathy in women. Many other studies found specific associations of oxytocin, arginine-vasopressin, serotonin and dopamine receptor gene polymorphisms with various aspects of trait empathy. As all these receptors belong to the guanine-binding protein (G protein) coupled receptor family, it is a reasonable assumption, that alterations in genes encoding G protein subunits also influence the signal transduction in empathy related circuits. However, to the best of our knowledge, these genomic variations have not yet been studied in genetic research on empathy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30365517 PMCID: PMC6203261 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Empathy scores by GNAS (C393T) genotype for all participants.
| All | CC | TC | TT | p | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 421 | 100%) | (n = 124 | 30%) | (n = 189 | 44.9%) | (n = 108 | 25.1%) | ||||||
| Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | ||
| 60 | 14 (53–67) | 60 | 14 (54–68) | 60 | 14 (52–67) | 59.5 | 12 (53–65) | 0.24 | |
| 32 | 9 (27–36) | 32 | 10 (28–38) | 32 | 9 (28–36) | 30 | 8 (27–35) | 0.06 | |
| 18 | 5 (15–20) | 18 | 5 (15–20) | 18 | 5 (15–20) | 17 | 5 (14–19) | 0.06 | |
| 14 | 6 (11–17) | 15 | 7 (11–18) | 14 | 7 (11–18) | 14 | 7 (10–17) | 0.14 | |
| 28 | 8 (24–32) | 29 | 7 (25–32) | 28 | 7 (24–31) | 28 | 9 (24–33) | 0.50 | |
| 17 | 4 (15–19) | 17 | 3 (16–19) | 17 | 4 (15–19) | 17 | 4 (15–19) | 0.91 | |
| 11 | 6 (8–14) | 12 | 6 (8–14) | 11 | 6 (8–14) | 11 | 6 (8–14) | 0.63 | |
TES: trait empathy score, CES: cognitive empathy score, PT: perspective taking; FT: fantasy; EES: emotional empathy score. EC: empathic concern; PD: personal distress. Mdn: medians were included to show ranked effects. IQR: interquartile range was used as a measure of dispersion, with the 25th and the 75th percentiles in brackets (values with decimal places were rounded to whole numbers for reasons of space).
* p values were calculated using the Jonckheere-Terpstra-Test.
Empathy scores by GNAS (C393T) genotype for male participants.
| All | CC | TC | TT | p | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 231 | 100%) | (n = 66 | 28.6%) | (n = 107 | 46.3%) | (n = 58 | 25.1%) | ||||||
| Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | ||
| 56 | 12 (49–61) | 56 | 13 (49–62) | 56 | 13 (50–63) | 57 | 13 (48–61) | 0.78 | |
| 30 | 8 (26–34) | 30 | 7 (26–33) | 30 | 8 (26–34) | 30 | 8 (26–34) | 0.97 | |
| 17 | 6 (14–20) | 17 | 6 (14–20) | 17 | 5 (15–20) | 17 | 5 (15–20) | 0.98 | |
| 13 | 6 (10–16) | 13 | 7 (10–17) | 13 | 5 (11–16) | 13 | 7 (9–16) | 0.79 | |
| 26 | 7 (22–29) | 26 | 6 (24–30) | 26 | 6 (23–29) | 25.5 | 6 (22–28) | 0.24 | |
| 16 | 4 (14–18) | 16 | 4 (14–18) | 16 | 4 (14–18) | 16 | 5 (13–18) | 0.48 | |
| 9 | 5 (7–12) | 11 | 6 (7–13) | 9 | 5 (7–12) | 9 | 6 (7–13) | 0.39 | |
TES: trait empathy score, CES: cognitive empathy score, PT: perspective taking; FT: fantasy; EES: emotional empathy score. EC: empathic concern; PD: personal distress. Mdn: medians were included to show ranked effects. IQR: interquartile range was used as a measure of dispersion, with the 25th and the 75th percentiles in brackets (values with decimal places were rounded to whole numbers for reasons of space).
* p values were calculated using the Jonckheere-Terpstra-Test.
Empathy scores by GNAS (C393T) genotype for female participants.
| All | CC | TC | TT | p | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 190 | 100%) | (n = 58 | 30.5%) | (n = 82 | 43.2%) | (n = 50 | 26.3%) | ||||||
| Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | Mdn | IQR | ||
| 65 | 13 (58–71) | 65 | 12 (60–72) | 66 | 13 (58–71) | 64 | 13 (57–70) | 0.14 | |
| 34 | 8 (30–38) | 35.5 | 7 (32–39) | 34.5 | 9 (30–39) | 32.5 | 7 (28–35) | 0.01 | |
| 18 | 5 (15–20) | 18 | 5 (16–21) | 18 | 6 (15–21) | 17 | 4 (14–18) | <0.001 | |
| 16 | 6 (13–19) | 17 | 6 (14–20) | 17 | 7 (13–20) | 15 | 6 (12–18) | 0.07 | |
| 31 | 8 (27–35) | 31 | 7 (28–35) | 30 | 7 (27–34) | 31.5 | 9 (27–36) | 0.62 | |
| 18 | 4 (16–20) | 18 | 3 (17–20) | 17 | 4 (16–20) | 18.5 | 3 (17–20) | 0.50 | |
| 13 | 5 (13–15) | 13 | 5 (10–15) | 13 | 4 (11–15) | 13 | 6 (10–16) | 0.65 | |
TES: trait empathy score, CES: cognitive empathy score, PT: perspective taking; FT: fantasy; EES: emotional empathy score. EC: empathic concern; PD: personal distress. Mdn: medians were included to show ranked effects. IQR: interquartile range was used as a measure of dispersion, with the 25th and the 75th percentiles in brackets (values with decimal places were rounded to whole numbers for reasons of space).
* p values were calculated using the Jonckheere-Terpstra-Test.
Fig 1Perspective taking [PT] scores of female participants across genotypes.
Boxes represent the 25th percentile, the median and the 75th percentile. Whiskers represent the minima and maxima of PT scores excluding outliers.