Literature DB >> 30365162

Which variables should be controlled when measuring the granulometry of a chewed bolus? A systematic review.

Guillaume Bonnet1,2, Cindy Batisse1,2, Marie-Agnès Peyron3, Emmanuel Nicolas1,2, Martine Hennequin1,2.   

Abstract

The distribution of food particles in a chewed bolus characterizes the food destruction after food oral processing (FOP). Previous reviews report that it could be affected by a lot of parameters as the number of chewing strokes, the dental status, but the conditions for producing reproducible data allowing inter-studies comparison have not been clearly described yet. This systematic review aims to identify the variables that can affect bolus granulometry determination, and to calculate their relative weights in the median particle size (D50 ) variations. The systematic review focuses on granulometry expressed as D50 of the most used foods (peanuts, carrots, and almonds) and materials (Optosil and Optocal). Based on 58 studies, 5 variables among 60 being extracted could explain the D50 variations. Conceptual differences between the conditions for FOP should be considered. After Chewing-test, the bolus is collected after a predefined number of strokes and its granulometry characterizes the effects of the dental and muscular apparatus on food destruction, while after Mastication-test the bolus is collected at the swallowing threshold, and its granulometry reflects the outcome of the abilities of the subject to adapt his/her mastication behavior to food texture. Experimental conditions related either to physical sieving or image analysis used to analyze the collected boluses impact the D50 values. Finally, when type of test, sieving conditions, type of food or material, number of chewing strokes, and the oral status of the subjects are controlled, mean D50 values are reproducible and could be used for inter-studies comparisons. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This review provides tables that could be useful to control mean D50 variations in further research.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chewing; food bolus granulometry; image analysis; mastication; sieving; swallowing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30365162     DOI: 10.1111/jtxs.12376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Texture Stud        ISSN: 0022-4901            Impact factor:   3.223


  8 in total

1.  Food matrix structure (from Biscuit to Custard) has an impact on folate bioavailability in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Caroline Buffière; Manon Hiolle; Marie-Agnès Peyron; Ruddy Richard; Nathalie Meunier; Cindy Batisse; Didier Rémond; Didier Dupont; Françoise Nau; Bruno Pereira; Isabelle Savary-Auzeloux
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Submillimetre mechanistic designs of termite-built structures.

Authors:  Sebastian Oberst; Richard Martin; Benjamin J Halkon; Joseph C S Lai; Theodore A Evans; Mohammed Saadatfar
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment.

Authors:  Thais Marques Simek Vega Gonçalves; Martin Schimmel; Andries van der Bilt; Jianshe Chen; Hilbert W van der Glas; Kaoru Kohyama; Martine Hennequin; Marie-Agnès Peyron; Alain Woda; Claudio Rodrigues Leles; Luciano José Pereira
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Assessment of the Miniature Kramer Shear Cell to Measure Both Solid Food and Bolus Mechanical Properties and Their Interplay with Oral Processing Behavior.

Authors:  María Dolores Álvarez; Jaime Paniagua; Beatriz Herranz
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 5.  Masticatory Adaptation to Occlusal Changes.

Authors:  Pierre Bourdiol; Martine Hennequin; Marie-Agnes Peyron; Alain Woda
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Food Oral Processing-An Industry Perspective.

Authors:  Marine Devezeaux De Lavergne; Ashley K Young; Jan Engmann; Christoph Hartmann
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-02-09

7.  Study of occlusal acoustic parameters in assessing masticatory performance.

Authors:  Yue Xia; Lu Wang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  The effect of bolus size on masticatory parameters at swallowing threshold in children using a hard, solid, artificial test food.

Authors:  Ana Wintergerst; Roberto Samuel Gómez-Zúñiga
Journal:  J Texture Stud       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.942

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.