Literature DB >> 30364823

Arm Pain Versus Neck Pain: A Novel Ratio as a Predictor of Post-Operative Clinical Outcomes in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients.

Peter G Passias1, Saqib Hasan1, Kris Radcliff2, Robert Isaacs3, Kristina Bianco1, Cyrus M Jalai1, Gregory W Poorman1, Nancy J Worley1, Samantha R Horn1, Anthony Boniello1, Peter L Zhou1, Paul M Arnold4, Patrick Hsieh5, Alexander R Vaccaro2, Michael C Gerling1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Informed patient selection and counseling is key in improving surgical outcomes. Understanding the impact that certain baseline variables can have on postoperative outcomes is essential in optimizing treatment for certain symptoms, such as radiculopathy from cervical spine pathologies. The aim was to identify baseline characteristics that were related to improved or worsened postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine radiculopathic pain.
METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patient Sample: Surgical cervical spine patients with a diagnosis classification of "degenerative." Diagnoses included in the "degenerative" category were those that caused radiculopathy: cervical disc herniation, cervical stenosis, and cervical spondylosis without myelopathy. Baseline variables considered as predictors were: (1) age, (2) body mass index (BMI), (3) gender, (4) history of cervical spine surgery, (5) baseline Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, (6) baseline SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) scores, (7) baseline SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores, (8) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Arm score, and (9) VAS Neck. Outcome Measures: Improvement in NDI (≥50%), VAS Arm/Neck (≥50%), SF-36 PCS/MCS (≥10%) scores at 2-years postoperative. An arm-to-neck ratio (ANR) was also generated from baseline VAS scores. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated predictors for 2-year postoperative outcome improvements, controlling for surgical complications and technique.
RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-eight patients were included. Patients with ANR ≤ 1 (n = 214) were less likely to reach improvements in 2-year NDI (30.0% vs 39.2%, P = .050) and SF-36 PCS (42.4% vs 53.5%, P = .025). Multivariate analysis for neck disability revealed higher baseline SF-36 PCS (odds ratio [OR] 1.053) and MCS (OR 1.028) were associated with over 50% improvements. Higher baseline NDI were reduced odds of postoperative neck pain improvement (OR 0.958). Arm pain greater than neck pain at baseline was associated with both increased odds of postoperative arm pain improvement (OR 1.707) and SF36 PCS improvement (OR 1.495).
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified specific symptom locations and health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores, which were associated with postoperative pain and disability improvement. In particular, baseline arm pain greater than neck pain was determined to have the greatest impact on whether patients met at least 50% improvement in their upper body pain score. These findings are important for clinicians to optimize patient outcomes through effective preoperative counseling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arm neck ratio; arm pain; cervical spine; neck pain; radiculopathy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30364823      PMCID: PMC6198621          DOI: 10.14444/5078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  43 in total

1.  Diagnostic cervical zygapophyseal joint blocks for chronic cervical pain.

Authors:  G C Speldewinde; G M Bashford; I R Davidson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2001-02-19       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Long-lasting cervical radicular pain managed with surgery, physiotherapy, or a cervical collar. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  L C Persson; C A Carlsson; J Y Carlsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Relief of pain by anterior cervical-spine fusion for spondylosis. A report of sixty-five patients.

Authors:  A A White; W O Southwick; R J Deponte; J W Gainor; R Hardy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The results of anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. Review of ninety-three consecutive cases.

Authors:  L H Riley; R A Robinson; K A Johnson; A E Walker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Degenerative disorders of the lumbar and cervical spine.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Roh; Andelle L Teng; Jung U Yoo; John Davis; Christopher Furey; Henry H Bohlman
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva; Julie M Fritz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery.

Authors:  Frank S Kleinstück; Dieter Grob; Friederike Lattig; Viktor Bartanusz; Francois Porchet; Dezsö Jeszenszky; David O'Riordan; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Chronic benign cervical pain syndromes. Surgical considerations.

Authors:  F T Wetzel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Predictors of outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Brian R Subach; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Saniya S Godil; David N Shau; Stephen K Mendenhall; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-11-23
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of Dynamic Foraminal Stenosis with Positional MRI in Patients with C6 Radiculopathy-Mimicking Pain: A Prospective Radiologic Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ozcan Kaya; Kerim Sariyilmaz; Yildiray Tutpinar; Mehmet Fevzi Cakmak; Mehmet Semih Cakir; Okan Ozkunt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 2.  Clinical outcomes and revision rates following four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Anastasios Charalampidis; Nader Hejrati; Hari Ramakonar; Pratipal S Kalsi; Eric M Massicotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.