Literature DB >> 30364629

Species characteristics of felids and canids, and the number of articles published for each species between 2013 and 2017.

L Tensen1.   

Abstract

The data presented are related to the research article entitled "Biases in wildlife and conservation research, using felids and canids as a case study" available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00423. This data article lists species characteristics of two families of the order Carnivora, the Felidae and Canidae, and quantitatively categorizes research output for each species. The species characteristics that were included in the dataset are body size (in kg), geographic range size, IUCN species status, population trend, likelihood of being a keystone species, number of species per genus, the Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) score, and the Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) score. All scientific articles that were published on felid and canid species between 2013 and 2017 were listed and subdivided into the following research topics: (1) ecology and behaviour, (2) conservation and wildlife management, (3) anatomy and physiology, (4) diseases and other health issues, (5) captive housing and artificial reproduction, (6) genetic diversity and phylogenetic structure, and (7) taxonomy and palaeoecology. All the data is made publically available.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30364629      PMCID: PMC6197655          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data This data can be used to find trends and gaps in carnivore research. This data can assist in setting prioritization schemes for conservation. This data can highlight biases in wildlife and conservation research.

Data

It is important find biases in wildlife research to better allocate conservation funds in the future [1]. For instance, there is a research-implementation gap in scientific research with regards to species conservation [2], [3], [4]. Certain species are being studied considerably more often than other species [5], [6], and research is not yet focussed on taxa that need it the most [7]. Preferably, wildlife biologists should attempt to focus on species that are endangered, have a limited geographic range, fill a keystone role in the ecosystem, or are taxonomically distinct [1], [2], [4]. This article lists species characteristics of two families of the order Carnivora: the Felidae (hereafter felids) and Canidae (hereafter canids), and quantitatively categorizes research output for each species. This article includes 37 felid species and 36 canid species. Body size was based on average weight (in kg) derived from [8] for felid species and [9] for canid species (Table 1). Body weight ranged from 1.8 to 173 kg in felids, and 1 to 39 kg in canids.
Table 1

All felid and canid species included in this dataset and their average body weight (in kg).

Felidae species
Canidae species
Species nameScientific nameWeightSpecies nameScientific nameWeight
CheetahAcinonyx jubatus38.7Short eared dogAtelocynus microtis9.5
African golden catCaracal aurata9.1Side-striped jackalCanis adustus8.8
CaracalCaracal caracal11.5African golden wolfCanis anthus11
Bay catCatopuma badia2.3Golden jackalCanis aureus8.1
Asiatic golden catCatopuma temminckii10.7CoyoteCanis latrans10.9
Jungle catFelis chaus6.6Grey wolfCanis lupus39
Sand catFelis margarita2.5Black-backed jackalCanis mesomelas7.8
Black footed catFelis nigripes1.6Red wolfCanis rufus26.4
Wild catFelis silvestris4.3Ethiopian wolfCanis simensis14.5
OcelotLeopardus pardalis11.7Crab-eating foxCerdocyon thous5.7
Southern tigrinaLeopardus guttulus2.1Maned wolfChrysocyon brachyurus25
OncillaLeopardus tigrinus2.4DholeCuon alpinus15.8
MargayLeopardus wiedii3.3CulpeoLycalopex culpaeus9.8
Pampas catLeopardus colocolo4Darwin׳s foxLycalopex fulvipes3.1
Geoffroy׳s catLeopardus geoffroyi5.1South American gray foxLycalopex griseus3.7
KodkodLeopardus guigna1.6Pampas foxLycalopex gymnocercus4.4
Andean mountain catLeopardus jacobita4.5Sechura foxLycalopex sechurae3.6
ServalLeptailurus serval9.9Hoary foxLycalopex vetulus3.4
Canada lynxLynx canadensis9.7African wild dogLycaon pictus26
Eurasian lynxLynx lynx18.5Raccoon dogNyctereutes procyonoides4.5
Iberian lynxLynx pardinus11.1Bat-eared foxOtocyon megalotis4.1
BobcatLynx rufus7.8Bush dogSpeothos venaticus6.5
Clouded leopardNeofelis nebulosa14.8Grey foxUrocyon cinereoargenteus3.7
Sunda clouded leopardNeofelis diardi15.5Island foxUrocyon littoralis1.9
ManulOtocolobus manul4.1Bengal foxVulpes bengalensis2.4
LionPanthera leo146.3Blandford׳s foxVulpes cana1
JaguarPanthera onca85.7Cape foxVulpes chama2.7
LeopardPanthera pardus41.8Corsac foxVulpes corsac2.4
TigerPanthera tigris173Tibetan foxVulpes ferrilata3.8
Snow leopardPanthera uncia37.6Arctic foxVulpes lagopus3.4
Marbled catPardofelis marmorata3.1Kit foxVulpes macrotis2.1
Leopard catPrionailurus bengalensis2.6Pallid foxVulpes pallida2.8
Flat-headed catPrionailurus planiceps1.8Rüppell׳s foxVulpes rueppellii1.5
Rusty-spotted catPrionailurus rubiginosus0.9Swift foxVulpes velox2.1
Fishing catPrionailurus viverrinus9.3Red foxVulpes vulpes5.8
PumaPuma concolor44.8Fennec foxVulpes zerda1.5
JaguarundiPuma yagouaroundi4.9
All felid and canid species included in this dataset and their average body weight (in kg). The conservation status, population trend and geographic range size were listed for each species (Table 2) and based on the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) Red List of Threatened Species [10]. For IUCN status, species with a higher risk of extinction are ranked in higher categories, from Data Deficient (DD), Least Concern (LC) to Near Threatened (NT), Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN), and Critically Endangered (CR). Most species are of Least Concern, and felid species are more often threatened with extinction than canids (Fig. 1). Population trend is either unknown, decreasing, stable, or increasing. Geographic range size was based on distribution maps provided by the IUCN and divided into seven categories for the purpose of this data overview: (1) < 10,000 km2; (2) 10,000–100,000 km2; (3) 100,000–900,000 km2; (4) 1–4 million km2; (5) 5–9 million km2; (6) 10–19 million km2; and (7) > 20 million km2. Most species had a geographic range size of 1 to 4 million km2 (Fig. 2).
Table 2

The IUCN status, population trend and geographic range size for felid and canid species. IUCN status was Least Concern (LC), Near Threatened (NT), Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN), or Critically Endangered (CR). Geographic range size was (1) < 10,000 km2, (2) 10,000–100,000 km2, (3) 100,000–900,000 km2, (4) 1–4 million km2, (5) 5–9 million km2, (6) 10–19 million km2, or (7) > 20 million km2.

Felidae species
Canidae species
Species nameIUCN statusPopulation trendRange sizeSpecies nameIUCN statusPopulation trendRange size
CheetahENstable4Short eared dogNTdecreasing4
African golden catVUdecreasing4Side-striped jackalLCstable6
CaracalLCunknown6African golden wolfnot listedunknown3
Bay catENdecreasing3Golden jackalLCincreasing7
Asiatic golden catNTdecreasing3CoyoteLCincreasing6
Jungle catLCdecreasing5Grey wolfLCstable7
Sand catLCunknown3Black-backed jackalLCstable5
Black footed catVUdecreasing3Red wolfCEincreasing1
Wild catLCdecreasing7Ethiopian wolfENdecreasing1
OcelotLCdecreasing6Crab-eating foxLCstable5
Southern tigrinaVUdecreasing4Maned wolfNTunknown4
OncillaVUdecreasing5DholeENdecreasing4
MargayNTdecreasing6CulpeoLCstable4
Pampas catNTdecreasing4Darwin׳s foxENdecreasing2
Geoffroy׳s catLCstable4South American gray foxLCstable3
KodkodVUdecreasing3Pampas foxLCstable4
Andean mountain catENdecreasing3Sechura foxNTunknown3
ServalLCstable6Hoary foxLCunknown4
Canada lynxLCstable5African wild dogENdecreasing4
Eurasian lynxLCstable7Raccoon dogLCstable5
Iberian lynxENincreasing1Bat-eared foxLCstable5
BobcatLCstable6Bush dogNTdecreasing6
Clouded leopardVUdecreasing4Grey foxLCstable6
Sunda clouded leopardVUdecreasing3Island foxNTincreasing1
ManulNTdecreasing4Bengal foxLCdecreasing4
LionVUdecreasing4Blandford׳s foxLCstable4
JaguarNTdecreasing5Cape foxLCstable4
LeopardVUdecreasing5Corsac foxLCunknown5
TigerENdecreasing3Tibetan foxLCunknown4
Snow leopardENdecreasing3Arctic foxLCstable6
Marbled catNTdecreasing4Kit foxLCdecreasing4
Leopard catLCstable5Pallid foxLCunknown4
Flat-headed catENdecreasing2Rüppell׳s foxLCstable6
Rusty-spotted catNTdecreasing4Swift foxLCstable3
Fishing catVUdecreasing3Red foxLCstable7
PumaLCdecreasing7Fennec foxLCstable6
JaguarundiLCdecreasing6
Fig. 1

IUCN status of felid and canid species.

Fig. 2

Geographic range size of felid and canid species.

The IUCN status, population trend and geographic range size for felid and canid species. IUCN status was Least Concern (LC), Near Threatened (NT), Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN), or Critically Endangered (CR). Geographic range size was (1) < 10,000 km2, (2) 10,000–100,000 km2, (3) 100,000–900,000 km2, (4) 1–4 million km2, (5) 5–9 million km2, (6) 10–19 million km2, or (7) > 20 million km2. IUCN status of felid and canid species. Geographic range size of felid and canid species. The likelihood of being a keystone species (hereafter keystone effect) was predicted for each species and based on the following definition: “a strongly interacting species whose top-down effect on species diversity and competition is large relative to its biomass dominance within a functional group [11].” The keystone effect was divided into three categories: (1) top predator with a strong top-down effect in a functional group, (2) meso predator with a moderate top-down effect in a functional group, and (3) small predator with a minor top-down effect in a functional group (Table 3). The majority of felid and canid species are small predators (Fig. 3).
Table 3

Felid and canid species listed into three categories: (1) top predator with a strong top-down effect in a functional group, (2) meso predator with a moderate top-down effect in a functional group, and (3) small predator with a minor top-down effect in a functional group.

Keystone effectFelidae speciesCanidae species
Category 1Canada lynxCoyote
LionGrey wolf
JaguarRed wolf
LeopardEthiopian wolf
Tiger
Snow leopard
Puma
Category 2CheetahSide-striped jackal
CaracalAfrican golden wolf
OcelotGolden jackal
ServalBlack-backed jackal
Eurasian lynxCrab-eating fox
Iberian lynxManed wolf
BobcatDhole
Clouded leopardAfrican wild dog
Sunda clouded leopardRaccoon dog
Island fox
Arctic fox
Red fox
Category 3African golden catShort eared dog
Bay catCulpeo
Asiatic golden catDarwin׳s fox
Jungle catSouth American gray fox
Sand catPampas fox
Black footed catSechura fox
Wild catHoary fox
Southern tigrinaBat-eared fox
OncillaBush dog
MargayGrey fox
Pampas catBengal fox
Geoffroy׳s catBlandford׳s fox
KodkodCape fox
Andean mountain catCorsac fox
ManulTibetan fox
Marbled catKit fox
Leopard catPallid fox
Flat-headed catRüppell׳s fox
Rusty-spotted catSwift fox
Fishing catFennec fox
Jaguarundi
Fig. 3

Keystone effect of felid and canid species. Species are either a (1) top predator with a strong top-down effect in a functional group, (2) meso predator with a moderate top-down effect in a functional group, or (3) small predator with a minor top-down effect in a functional group.

Felid and canid species listed into three categories: (1) top predator with a strong top-down effect in a functional group, (2) meso predator with a moderate top-down effect in a functional group, and (3) small predator with a minor top-down effect in a functional group. Keystone effect of felid and canid species. Species are either a (1) top predator with a strong top-down effect in a functional group, (2) meso predator with a moderate top-down effect in a functional group, or (3) small predator with a minor top-down effect in a functional group. Taxonomic uniqueness was listed for each species, by deriving Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) scores and Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) scores [12]; the higher the score, the higher a species’ conservation priority (Table 4). We also predicted taxonomic uniqueness by counting the number of species per genus; a monotypic genus, which consists of only one representative, has a higher conservation priority Table 5.
Table 4

Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) and Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) scores, and the number of species per genus for felid and canid species.

Felidae species
Canidae species
Species nameED scoreEDGE scoreNo. in genusSpecies nameED scoreEDGE scoreNo. in genus
Cheetah13.454.11Short eared dog3.692.241
African golden cat9.323.032Side-striped jackal3.461.498
Caracal9.772.382African golden wolf8
Bay cat9.114.392Golden jackal3.461.498
Asiatic golden cat9.113.012Coyote3.251.458
Jungle cat7.372.124Grey wolf3.261.458
Sand cat7.542.844Black-backed jackal3.561.528
Black footed cat7.553.534Red wolf8
Wild cat7.272.114Ethiopian wolf3.223.528
Ocelot8.942.38Crab-eating fox3.861.581
Southern tigrina8Maned wolf3.782.261
Oncilla8.133.68Dhole3.793.651
Margay8.942.998Culpeo2.741.326
Pampas cat7.342.828Darwin׳s fox2.824.116
Geoffroy׳s cat8.232.928South American gray fox2.821.346
Kodkod8.163.68Pampas fox2.741.326
Andean mountain cat8.154.298Sechura fox2.732.016
Serval9.842.381Hoary fox3.011.396
Canada lynx7.972.194African wild dog3.873.661
Eurasian lynx7.982.24Raccoon dog7.922.191
Iberian lynx8.445.024Bat-eared fox8.492.251
Bobcat9.612.364Bush dog3.72.241
Clouded leopard7.283.52Grey fox6.422
Sunda clouded leopard7.283.52Island fox6.42.692
Manul8.992.991Bengal fox5.421.8612
Lion8.263.615Blandford׳s fox4.531.7112
Jaguar8.292.925Cape fox5.441.8612
Leopard8.272.925Corsac fox3.481.512
Tiger8.334.315Tibetan fox3.481.512
Snow leopard8.384.325Arctic fox3.81.5712
Marbled cat9.233.711Kit fox3.51.512
Leopard cat9.892.394Pallid fox5.511.8712
Flat-headed cat10.694.544Rüppell׳s fox3.481.4912
Rusty-spotted cat9.973.784Swift fox3.51.512
Fishing cat9.884.474Red fox3.51.4912
Puma11.892.562Fennec fox4.531.7112
Jaguarundi11.932.562
Table 5

All scientific articles published on felid and canid species between 2013 and 2017. Research topics are (1) ecology and behaviour, (2) conservation and wildlife management, (3) anatomy and physiology, (4) diseases and other health issues, (5) captive housing and artificial reproduction, (6) genetic diversity and phylogenetic structure, or (7) taxonomy and palaeoecology.

ArticlesResearch topics
Total1234567
Felidae species
Cheetah161362712572450
African golden cat31200000
Caracal10612010
Bay cat20100001
Asiatic golden cat72100112
Jungle cat40101110
Sand cat61211010
Black footed cat61013100
Wild cat601483174140
Ocelot59279411350
Southern tigrina73010111
Oncilla124013211
Margay106112000
Pampas cat61111020
Geoffroy׳s cat135300041
Kodkod145401130
Andean mountain cat30300000
Serval74003000
Canada lynx48211305270
Eurasian lynx11841334131773
Iberian lynx5199013956
Bobcat963025332060
Clouded leopard246424602
Sunda clouded leopard104600000
Manul70005200
Lion27859102145721169
Jaguar16441754209105
Leopard2326199152091810
Tiger35944157246628373
Snow leopard80184426361
Marbled cat41300000
Leopard cat451311112161
Flat-headed cat20100010
Rusty-spotted cat10000100
Fishing cat100512200
Puma27610810310286174
Jaguarundi104014010
Total220557675410838715517050
Canidae species
Short eared dog00000000
Side-striped jackal00000000
African golden wolf62200011
Golden jackal101321311330102
Coyote22889766347151
Grey wolf5971751982180109221
Black-backed jackal2210324120
Red wolf3661527321
Ethiopian wolf165307010
Crab-eating fox61721730320
Maned wolf52110922451
Dhole33131132103
Culpeo146332000
Darwin׳s fox30002010
South American gray fox91214001
Pampas fox2121610020
Sechura fox10100000
Hoary fox60015000
African wild dog74243125642
Raccoon dog148111223706242
Bat-eared fox139021001
Bush dog81203200
Grey fox146106010
Island fox2851206140
Bengal fox51112000
Blandford׳s fox11000000
Cape fox33000000
Corsac fox71112011
Tibetan fox82003021
Arctic fox95204132910154
Kit fox26101112020
Pallid fox32000010
Rüppell׳s fox10000001
Swift fox141703030
Red fox4859279232264556
Fennec fox60013011
Total21455385011496035824650
Evolutionary Distinctiveness (ED) and Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) scores, and the number of species per genus for felid and canid species. All scientific articles published on felid and canid species between 2013 and 2017. Research topics are (1) ecology and behaviour, (2) conservation and wildlife management, (3) anatomy and physiology, (4) diseases and other health issues, (5) captive housing and artificial reproduction, (6) genetic diversity and phylogenetic structure, or (7) taxonomy and palaeoecology. All scientific articles published on felid and canid species between 2013 and 2017 were listed (Supplementary material S1 for felids and S2 for canids). The research papers were subdivided into the following research topics: (1) ecology and behaviour, (2) conservation and wildlife management, (3) anatomy and physiology, (4) diseases and other health issues, (5) captive housing and artificial reproduction, (6) genetic diversity and phylogenetic structure, and (7) taxonomy and palaeoecology. For felids, most research papers were related to conservation and wildlife management, and for canids most papers were related to diseases and other health issues (Table 5).

Experimental design, materials and methods

Literature searches were conducted in Scopus, EBSCO and Google Scholar to optimize the yield of scientific articles [13]. Common and scientific species names [10] were used as search strings in the electronic databases, for instance: cheetah OR Acinoyx jubatus. All peer-reviewed articles that were published between 2013 and 2017 were included. Subspecies were not investigated separately in this literature search, and domesticated animals were excluded. Observational notes or replies to previous publications were also excluded from the database, as well as articles for which no English abstract was available. Articles were listed for species only if the animal in question was the main research topic or among a maximum of three. The research papers were subdivided into research topics that were created during the literature searches and partly based on previous studies [7], [14]. The data led to an overview of species characteristics and the number of articles published between 2013 and 2017 for felid and canid species. The data can be used to assess potential bias in research and conservation prioritization [1].
Subject areaBiology
More specific subject areaConservation management
Type of dataTable, Figure
How data was acquiredThe data was obtained from online literature searching engines Scopus, EBSCO and Google Scholar
Data formatRaw and partially analysed
Experimental factorsNone
Experimental featuresQuantitative data analysis
Data source locationNot applicable
Data accessibilityData is presented in this article and publically available for educational, commercial, or scientific purposes.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap.

Authors:  Andrew T Knight; Richard M Cowling; Mathieu Rouget; Andrew Balmford; Amanda T Lombard; Bruce M Campbell
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  Searching the scientific literature: implications for quantitative and qualitative reviews.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Brandon S Aylward; Michael C Roberts; Spencer C Evans
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-07

3.  Priorities for global felid conservation.

Authors:  Amy J Dickman; Amy E Hinks; Ewan A Macdonald; Dawn Burnham; David W Macdonald
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Tetrapods on the EDGE: Overcoming data limitations to identify phylogenetic conservation priorities.

Authors:  Rikki Gumbs; Claudia L Gray; Oliver R Wearn; Nisha R Owen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.