| Literature DB >> 30364549 |
Nicola Keay1, Gavin Francis2, Karen Hind1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of a sport-specific energy availability (EA) questionnaire, combined with clinical interview, for identifying male athletes at risk of developing bone health, endocrine and performance consequences of relative energy deficiency in sports (RED-S).Entities:
Keywords: bone health; energy availability; male athletes; relative energy deficiency in sport
Year: 2018 PMID: 30364549 PMCID: PMC6196965 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med ISSN: 2055-7647
Descriptive characteristics
| N=50 | Mean±SD | Range (min–max) |
| Age (years) | 35.0±14.2 | 18–71 |
| Height (m) | 1.81±0.06 | 1.69–1.90 |
| Weight (kg) | 72.3±6.7 | 61.5–87.7 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.6±1.5 | 18.3–25.9 |
| Years of cycling training | 11.2±9.2 | 1.5–40.0 |
| Training load: average hours on bike/week | 12.5±4.4 | 6.0–24.0 |
| 60 min functional threshold power (W) | 329±46 | 195–416 |
| Average number of portions dairy/day | 2.4±1.4 | 0.0–5.0 |
| Average caffeine servings/day (coffee/gels, etc.) | 2.8±2.2 | 0.0–14.0 |
| Weekly alcohol units | 3.2±5.0 | 0.0–25.0 |
Endocrine and metabolic biomarkers
| Mean±SD | Range (min–max) | |
| Albumin | 43.5±3.0 | 37.3–50.6 |
| Albumin, | −0.01±0.69 | −1.43 to 1.64 |
| Alkaline phosphatase | 65.0±24.7 | 32.0–161.0 |
| Alkaline phosphatase, | 0.00±0.73 | −0.99 to 2.93 |
| Corrected calcium | 2.41±0.14 | 1.97–2.90 |
| Corrected calcium, | 0.94±1.37 | −3.43 to 5.68 |
| Total testosterone | 14.73±4.23 | 6.07–24.30 |
| Total testosterone, | −0.67±0.88 | −2.45 to 1.34 |
| Free triiodothyronine | 4.83±0.71 | 3.27 to 6.19 |
| Free triiodothyronine, | −0.13±0.76 | −1.78 to 1.31 |
| Vitamin D 25 OH | 74.8±33.4 | 31.1–167.0 |
| Vitamin D 25 OH, | −1.19±1.06 | −2.55 to 1.71 |
Values in parentheses indicate relevant population reference ranges (age specific for testosterone).
Z-scores calculated from reference range (age specific in case of testosterone).
BMD and body composition
| Mean±SD | Range (min–max) | |
| BMD | ||
| Lumbar spine L1-L4 BMD (g/cm2) | 1.108±0.152 | 0.807–1.409 |
| Lumbar spine Z-score | - 0.8±1.2 | −3.2 to 1.6 |
| Femoral neck mean BMD (g/cm2) | 0.974±0.119 | 0.707–1.218 |
| Femoral neck Z-score | - 0.6±0.9 | −2.6 to 1.0 |
| Body composition | ||
| Total fat mass (kg) | 10.01±2.42 | 4.75–14.25 |
| Fat mass Z-score | –1.1±0.9 | −3.2 to 0.7 |
| Body fat percentage | 14.1±3.2 | 7.5–20.1 |
| VAT (kg) | 0.222±0.147 | 0.000–0.744 |
| Lean body mass (kg) | 60.89±6.00 | 49.90–74.92 |
| Leg lean mass (kg) | 21.32±2.51 | 16.84–29.30 |
BMD, bone mineral density; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
Figure 1Boxplots showing male cyclist lumbar spine BMD Z-Score in subgroups. BMD, bone mineral density.
Figure 2Decision tree showing key variables explaining lumbar spine BMD Z-score in male cyclists. BMD, bone mineral density; EA, energy availability.
Figure 3FTP watts/kg vs weekly training hours. FTP, functional threshold power.