| Literature DB >> 30363721 |
Guoqian Hao1,2, Ihsan A Al-Shehbaz3, Lei Zhang2, Xinyi Guo2, Hao Bi2, Songbai Xu1, Jianquan Liu2.
Abstract
Eutremananum, a new high-elevation (4500-4600 m) species from Chola Shan, Sichuan (Southwest China), is described and illustrated. It is similar morphologically to E.nepalense but is readily distinguished by having oblong to elliptic or obovate to spatulate (vs. suborbicular to broadly ovate) leaves, glabrous (vs. puberulent) sepals and ovate to oblong fruit 4-7 × 2-3 mm with flattened valves (vs. ovoid to subglobose fruit 2-3 × 1.8-2 mm with rounded valves). The genetic differences amongst E.nanum, E.nepalense and other close relatives are further confirmed by phylogenetic analyses using ITS and cpDNA sequence variations. The new combination E.sinense is proposed.Entities:
Keywords: Cruciferae ; Eutrema nanum ; Eutrema sinense ; Sichuan; molecular phylogeny
Year: 2018 PMID: 30363721 PMCID: PMC6182258 DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.109.27049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PhytoKeys ISSN: 1314-2003 Impact factor: 1.635
The sources of materials used for molecular analyses of Himalayan (all vouchers at SZ).
| Taxon | Voucher | Source | Coordinate |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Liu & Hao 14091 | Chola Shan, Sichuan, China |
|
|
| Liu 17124 | Chola Shan, Sichuan, China |
|
|
| Long et al. 605 | Sikkim, India |
|
|
| Liu 13114 | Biluo Snow Mountain, Yunnan, China |
|
|
| Liu & Hao 13074 | Yarla Shampo Mountain, Tibet, China |
|
|
| Liu & Hao 13144 | Zhuodala Mountain, Sichuan, China |
|
|
| Liu 17108a | Mila Mountain, Tibet, China |
|
|
| Liu & Hao 14094 | Maila Mountain, Sichuan, China |
|
|
| Liu 13024 | Lasa, Tibet, China |
|
|
| Liu & Hao 13049 | Tianshan Mountain, Xinjiang, China |
|
Figure 3.Geographical distribution of the sampled populations of and related species.
Figure 1.G.Q. Hao, J.Quan. Liu & Al-Shehbaz. A Plant B Fruit C Leaf trichomes.
Figure 2.Holotype of .
Diagnosing sites of the aligned ITS and three cpDNA sequences between and .
| Species | ITS | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 508 | 82 | 337 | 165 | 276 | 333 | 342 | 391 | 449 | 483 | 495 | 497 | 549 | |||
|
| C | C | T | C | T | T | T | T | T | T | C | T | T | ||
|
| T | A | C | T | C | G | C | A | G | C | T | C | A | ||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| 601 | 603 | 633 | 638 | 657 | 28 | 40 | 48 | 92 | 114 | 115 | 138- | 212 | 228 | 235 | |
|
| C | C | T | T | G | T | C | G | - | G | C | - | 2 nt | C | C |
|
| T | T | C | A | A | A | G | A | 6 nt | T | A | 74 nt | - | T | A |
nr=nucleotide.
Tree statistics for analyses of the datasets.
| Data set | ITS* | Combined cpDNA* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of sequences | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Aligned length used in analyses | 698 | 455 | 506 | 779 | 1786 |
| No. of variable characters | 141 | 58 | 17 | 66 | 169 |
| No. of parsimony-informative characters | 56 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 47 |
| Tree length (steps) | 78 | 70 | 10 | 71 | 195 |
| Consistency (CI) | 0.833333 | 0.900000 | 1.000000 | 0.873239 | 0.892308 |
| Retention index (RI) | 0.803030 | 0.708333 | 1.000000 | 0.790698 | 0.764045 |
| Rescaled consistency index (RC) | 0.669192 | 0.637500 | 1.000000 | 0.690468 | 0.681763 |
* gaps were coded and included.
Figure 4.The Maximum Likelihood tree based on analysis of ITS (A) and Three cpDNA regions (B). Numbers above branches are maximum likelihood bootstrap support values and maximum parsimony bootstrap support values. ‘-’ represents <50%.