Marina Picillo1, Paolo Barone1, Maria Teresa Pellecchia1. 1. Neuroscience Section Department of Medicine and Surgery Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CMAND) University of Salerno Salerno Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Parkinson's disease, biomarkers represent tools that are potentially suitable for either clinical or research settings and are useful in predicting onset, confirming diagnosis, detecting progression, and evaluating response to potential disease-modifying treatments. The range of available biomarkers in Parkinson's disease is fast expanding and includes an increasing amount of laboratory, clinical, and imaging data. Indeed, the latter 2 represent the cornerstones of the diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease recently proposed by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society Task Force on the definition of Parkinson's disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this review, we describe current knowledge and emerging findings on clinical (with emphasis on nonmotor symptoms) and imaging biomarkers for Parkinson's disease, with a focus on prodromal, diagnostic, and middle/advanced phases. CONCLUSION: An increasing body of evidence suggests that merging clinical and imaging biomarkers through disease stages may be the best, fastest track to tackle Parkinson's disease.
BACKGROUND: In Parkinson's disease, biomarkers represent tools that are potentially suitable for either clinical or research settings and are useful in predicting onset, confirming diagnosis, detecting progression, and evaluating response to potential disease-modifying treatments. The range of available biomarkers in Parkinson's disease is fast expanding and includes an increasing amount of laboratory, clinical, and imaging data. Indeed, the latter 2 represent the cornerstones of the diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease recently proposed by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society Task Force on the definition of Parkinson's disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this review, we describe current knowledge and emerging findings on clinical (with emphasis on nonmotor symptoms) and imaging biomarkers for Parkinson's disease, with a focus on prodromal, diagnostic, and middle/advanced phases. CONCLUSION: An increasing body of evidence suggests that merging clinical and imaging biomarkers through disease stages may be the best, fastest track to tackle Parkinson's disease.
Authors: B J Weder; K L Leenders; P Vontobel; M Nienhusmeier; A Keel; W Zaunbauer; T Vonesch; H P Ludin Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 1999 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Rick C Helmich; Avner Thaler; Bart F L van Nuenen; Tanya Gurevich; Anat Mirelman; Karen S Marder; Susan Bressman; Avi Orr-Urtreger; Nir Giladi; Bastiaan R Bloem; Ivan Toni Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Maria G Cersosimo; Gabriela B Raina; Cristina Pecci; Alejandro Pellene; Cristian R Calandra; Cristiam Gutiérrez; Federico E Micheli; Eduardo E Benarroch Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: David S Goldstein; Courtney Holmes; Oladi Bentho; Takuya Sato; Jeffrey Moak; Yehonatan Sharabi; Richard Imrich; Shielah Conant; Basil A Eldadah Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2008-03-05 Impact factor: 4.891