OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the SLCO1B1, apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and CYP2C9 genotypes on the lipid-lowering efficacy of fluvastatin. METHODS: We performed electronic searches on the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies published through October 2017. Studies that reported the effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein were included so that the different genotype categories could be compared. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to summarize the effect estimates. RESULTS: Six studies, involving a total of 1171 individuals, were included in the final analysis. We noted that the patient carrier SLCO1B1 521TT was associated with greater change in TC (WMD: -2.98; 95% CI: -5.12 to -0.84; P=0.006) and LDL (WMD: -5.58; 95% CI: -10.64 to -0.52; P=0.031) compared with 521TC or CC. Furthermore, the patient carrier ApoE*2/*3 showed more change in high-density lipoprotein compared with ApoE*3/*3 (WMD: 18.76; 95% CI: 8.97-28.55; P<0.001) and ApoE*3/*4 or *4/*4 (WMD: 22.51; 95% CI: 0.98-44.04; P=0.040). Finally, the CYP2C9 genotypes showed no correlation with the effects of fluvastatin on TC, triglyceride, and LDL. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggested that the SLCO1B1 and ApoE polymorphisms could influence the lipid-lowering effect of fluvastatin, whereas the CYP2C9 genotypes were not associated with the therapeutic effects of fluvastatin.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the SLCO1B1, apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and CYP2C9 genotypes on the lipid-lowering efficacy of fluvastatin. METHODS: We performed electronic searches on the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies published through October 2017. Studies that reported the effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein were included so that the different genotype categories could be compared. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to summarize the effect estimates. RESULTS: Six studies, involving a total of 1171 individuals, were included in the final analysis. We noted that the patient carrier SLCO1B1 521TT was associated with greater change in TC (WMD: -2.98; 95% CI: -5.12 to -0.84; P=0.006) and LDL (WMD: -5.58; 95% CI: -10.64 to -0.52; P=0.031) compared with 521TC or CC. Furthermore, the patient carrier ApoE*2/*3 showed more change in high-density lipoprotein compared with ApoE*3/*3 (WMD: 18.76; 95% CI: 8.97-28.55; P<0.001) and ApoE*3/*4 or *4/*4 (WMD: 22.51; 95% CI: 0.98-44.04; P=0.040). Finally, the CYP2C9 genotypes showed no correlation with the effects of fluvastatin on TC, triglyceride, and LDL. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggested that the SLCO1B1 and ApoE polymorphisms could influence the lipid-lowering effect of fluvastatin, whereas the CYP2C9 genotypes were not associated with the therapeutic effects of fluvastatin.
Authors: Bodine P S Belderbos; Mirjam de With; Rajbir K Singh; Bram C Agema; Samira El Bouazzaoui; Esther Oomen-de Hoop; Ronald de Wit; Ron H N van Schaik; Ron H J Mathijssen; Sander Bins Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: C Jeiziner; K Suter; U Wernli; J M Barbarino; L Gong; M Whirl-Carrillo; T E Klein; T D Szucs; K E Hersberger; H E Meyer Zu Schwabedissen Journal: Pharmacogenomics J Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 3.550