Literature DB >> 30363023

National Testing of the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey and Implications for Adjustment in Scoring.

Layla Parast1, Megan Mathews1, Anagha Tolpadi1, Marc Elliott1, Elizabeth Flow-Delwiche2, Kirsten Becker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The emergency department (ED) setting is unique and measuring quality of care in the ED requires the development of ED-specific tools. The Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey was designed to measure patient experience in the ED setting.
OBJECTIVES: Describe results from the Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care Discharged to Community Survey including respondent characteristics and reported patient experience, and examine factors, including mode of survey administration, associated with response propensity and response patterns. RESEARCH
DESIGN: In total, 16,006 discharges were sampled from 50 hospitals nationwide to receive the survey using a mode experiment design. Logistic regression modeled response propensity; linear regression examined associations between response patterns and patient characteristics and mode.
SUBJECTS: In total, 3122 survey respondents. MEASURES: Measures of patient experience.
RESULTS: Patients reported that hospitals consistently informed them of the purpose of any new medications (84% yes, definitely), but did not consistently explain their possible side effects (53%). Age, education, health, and arrival by ambulance were significantly associated with response patterns. There were significant differences in response rate by mode: 29% mixed mode, 22% telephone only and 14% mail only. Mode of administration was significantly associated with response patterns whereby patients surveyed using telephone-only or mixed mode tended to respond more positively than those surveyed using mail only.
CONCLUSIONS: There is room for improvement in terms of patient experience in the ED setting. Effects of patient characteristics and survey mode on responses were large enough to necessitate appropriate adjustments if hospitals are to be compared in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30363023     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  5 in total

1.  Development and validation of a patient experience of care survey for emergency departments.

Authors:  Feifei Ye; Layla Parast; Ron D Hays; Marc N Elliott; Kirsten Becker; William G Lehrman; Debra Stark; Steven Martino
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Gender Differences in Patients' Experience of Care in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Peggy G Chen; Anagha Tolpadi; Marc N Elliott; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Debra S Stark; Layla Parast
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Adjusting for Patient Characteristics to Compare Quality of Care Provided by Serious Illness Programs.

Authors:  Maria DeYoreo; Rebecca Anhang Price; Cheryl K Montemayor; Anagha Tolpadi; Melissa Bradley; Danielle Schlang; Joan M Teno; Paul D Cleary; Marc N Elliott
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Association of Emergency Department Waiting Times With Patient Experience in Admitted and Discharged Patients.

Authors:  Andrew Nyce; Snehal Gandhi; Brian Freeze; Joshua Bosire; Terry Ricca; Eric Kupersmith; Anthony Mazzarelli; Jean-Sebastien Rachoin
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-04-28

5.  National travel distances for emergency care.

Authors:  Anagha Tolpadi; Marc N Elliott; Daniel Waxman; Kirsten Becker; Elizabeth Flow-Delwiche; William G Lehrman; Debra Stark; Layla Parast
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.