Literature DB >> 30362030

Does extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain get affected by menstrual cycle and menopause?

Ekrem Islamoglu1, Selim Tas2, Kaan Karamik2, Soner Yalcinkaya2, Husnu Tokgoz2, Murat Savas2.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of the menstrual cycle and menopause on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)-related pain outcome. Since March 2017, we evaluated a total of 145 women who underwent the first session of ESWL for renal or ureteral stones. Patients were divided into two groups, as menstruating and menopaused women. For menstruating women, the number of days between the last day of mens and ESWL was noted and women were separated as in the follicular phase (1-14 days) or in the luteal phase (15-30 days) of menstruation. To control these two female groups, 149 men of similar age were included in the study. After the procedure, the experienced pain was recorded on a ten-point visual analog scale (VAS) by the patient and they also rated the severity of pain as no, mild, tolerable, and intolerable on the pain questionnaire. The mean age of the patients was 43 ± 15 years for the female group and 42 ± 13 years for the male group. While stone burden was not different between the female and male groups (p = 0.459), VAS score was not statistically different between genders (p = 0.293). However, men reported a higher rate of mild pain, while women reported a higher rate of tolerable pain (p = 0.008) in the pain questionnaire. Mean VAS score was significantly lower for the menopaused women group than menstruating women, young and old men (p = 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, menopaused women group reported lower VAS score and better pain questionnaire result than menstruating women (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the follicular and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in terms of mean VAS score and pain questionnaire results (p = 0.891 and 0.441, respectively). When compared with the young men group, the only significant difference was pain questionnaire results between women in the luteal phase (p = 0.014). Multiple regression analysis showed that only menstruation (β = 0.639, p < 0.001) was an independent factor for VAS score. Menstrual cycle phase had no effect on pain perception during the ESWL session and menopaused women felt less pain than menstruating women during this procedure. The control male group showed that the reduction of ESWL-related pain in menopause was not related to aging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; Menopause; Menstrual cycle; Pain; Visual analog scale

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30362030     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-018-1084-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  29 in total

Review 1.  Sex-related hormonal influences on pain and analgesic responses.

Authors:  R B Fillingim; T J Ness
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Sex differences in pain and analgesia: the role of gonadal hormones.

Authors:  Rebecca M Craft; Jeffrey S Mogil; Anna Maria Aloisi
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 3.  Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different.

Authors:  R B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 4.  Sex differences in pain perception.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Wiesenfeld-Hallin
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2005-09

5.  Interethnic differences in pain perception.

Authors:  Howard P Greenwald
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Do anxiety, stress, or depression have any impact on pain perception during shock wave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Muammer Altok; Abdullah Akpinar; Mustafa Güneş; Mehmet Umul; Kadir Demirci; Ercan Baş
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Age-related differences in pain perception and report.

Authors:  S J Gibson; R D Helme
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.076

8.  Sex differences and hormonal influences on response to cold pressor pain in humans.

Authors:  William J Kowalczyk; Suzette M Evans; Adam M Bisaga; Maria A Sullivan; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Menopause affects pain depending on pain type and characteristics.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Meriggiola; Michela Nanni; Valeria Bachiocco; Stellina Vodo; Anna M Aloisi
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Gender role expectations of pain: relationship to experimental pain perception.

Authors:  Emily A Wise; Donald D Price; Cynthia D Myers; Marc W Heft; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.926

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Gender Differences in Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): Findings from a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Gillams; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Siri Øvereng Juliebø; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.092

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.