Literature DB >> 30362027

The optimal number of options for multiple-choice questions on high-stakes tests: application of a revised index for detecting nonfunctional distractors.

Mark R Raymond1, Craig Stevens2, S Deniz Bucak2.   

Abstract

Research suggests that the three-option format is optimal for multiple choice questions (MCQs). This conclusion is supported by numerous studies showing that most distractors (i.e., incorrect answers) are selected by so few examinees that they are essentially nonfunctional. However, nearly all studies have defined a distractor as nonfunctional if it is selected by fewer than 5% of examinees. A limitation of this definition is that the proportion of examinees available to choose a distractor depends on overall item difficulty. This is especially problematic for mastery tests, which consist of items that most examinees are expected to answer correctly. Based on the traditional definition of nonfunctional, a five-option MCQ answered correctly by greater than 90% of examinees will be constrained to have only one functional distractor. The primary purpose of the present study was to evaluate an index of nonfunctional that is sensitive to item difficulty. A secondary purpose was to extend previous research by studying distractor functionality within the context of professionally-developed credentialing tests. Data were analyzed for 840 MCQs consisting of five options per item. Results based on the traditional definition of nonfunctional were consistent with previous research indicating that most MCQs had one or two functional distractors. In contrast, the newly proposed index indicated that nearly half (47.3%) of all items had three or four functional distractors. Implications for item and test development are discussed.

Keywords:  Assessment; High-stakes testing; Item-writing guidelines; Multiple-choice questions; Test development

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30362027     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-018-9855-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  4 in total

1.  Faculty development program assists the new faculty in constructing high-quality short answer questions; a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Hamza Mohammad Abdulghani; Kamran Sattar; Tauseef Ahmad; Ashfaq Akram; Mahmoud Salah Khalil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Examining distractor qualities of pediatrics subject tests from a national assessment.

Authors:  Qianqian Pan; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-04

3.  Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Lalem Menber Belay; Tegbar Yigzaw Sendekie; Fantu Abebe Eyowas
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.263

4.  Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options.

Authors:  Mike Tweed
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.