Literature DB >> 30361432

Perspectives on Neuroradiology Medical Expert Testimony: Fact and Fiction.

D M Yousem1, G H Zoarski2, A S Mark3, E S Schwartz4.   

Abstract

There are numerous misconceptions about serving as a medical malpractice expert witness. By maintaining an objective perspective based in the unbiased interpretation of the images provided (for both sides of the conflict), one can best serve society as a whole. Most cases for which a neuroradiology expert is recruited are the following: 1) not with the radiologist as a defendant, 2) resolved without court testimony, and 3) short-lived if frivolous. One can learn much about medicine, our nonradiology colleagues, and the litigation process by participating as an expert witness.
© 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361432      PMCID: PMC7655393          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  3 in total

1.  Attorneys' requests for complete tax records from opposing expert witnesses: some approaches to the problem.

Authors:  Thomas G Gutheil; Robert I Simon; Skip Simpson
Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  2006

2.  Attitudes about medical malpractice: an American Society of Neuroradiology survey.

Authors:  N P Pereira; J S Lewin; K P Yousem; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Expert witnesses: neuroradiologists' perspectives.

Authors:  Nara P Pereira; Jonathan S Lewin; Kelly P Yousem; David M Yousem
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.532

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.