Uwe Reuter1, Peter J Goadsby2, Michel Lanteri-Minet3, Shihua Wen4, Peggy Hours-Zesiger5, Michel D Ferrari6, Jan Klatt5. 1. Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: uwe.reuter@charite.de. 2. NIHR-Wellcome Trust, King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, UK. 3. Pain Department and FHU InvoPain, CHU Nice-Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; INSERM U1107 Migraine and Trigeminal Pain, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France. 4. Novartis, East Hanover, NJ, USA. 5. Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland. 6. Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with migraine does not respond to, or cannot tolerate, oral preventive treatments. Erenumab is a novel CGRP-receptor antibody with preventive efficacy in migraine. We assessed its efficacy and tolerability in patients with episodic migraine in whom previous treatment with two-to-four migraine preventives had been unsuccessful. METHODS: LIBERTY was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study at 59 sites in 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years and had a history of episodic migraine with or without aura for at least 12 months, had migraine for an average of 4-14 days per month during the 3 months before screening, and had been treated unsuccessfully (in terms of either efficacy or tolerability, or both) with between two and four preventive treatments. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either erenumab 140 mg (via two 70 mg injections) or placebo every 4 weeks subcutaneously for 12 weeks. Randomisation was by interactive response technology and was stratified by monthly frequency of migraine headache (4-7 vs 8-14 migraine days per month) during the baseline phase. Cenduit generated the randomisation list and assigned participants to groups. Participants, investigators, people doing various assessments, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a 50% or greater reduction in the mean number of monthly migraine days during weeks 9-12. Efficacy was measured in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who started their assigned treatment and completed at least one post-baseline monthly migraine day measurement. Safety and tolerability were assessed by recording adverse events and by physical examination, assessment of vital signs, clinical laboratory assessments, and electrocardiography. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03096834. The trial is closed to new participants, but the open-label extension phase is ongoing. FINDINGS:Between March 20, 2017, and Oct 27, 2017, 246 participants were randomly assigned, 121 to the erenumab group and 125 to theplacebo group. 95 of 246 (39%) participants had previously unsuccessfully tried two preventive drugs, 93 (38%) had tried three, and 56 (23%) had tried four. At week 12, 36 (30%) patients in the erenumab had a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the mean number of monthly migraine days, compared with 17 (14%) in the placebo group (odds ratio 2·7 [95% CI 1·4-5·2]; p=0·002). The tolerability and safety profiles of erenumab and placebo were similar. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was injection site pain, which occurred in seven (6%) participants in both groups. INTERPRETATION: Compared with placebo, erenumab was efficacious in patients with episodic migraine who previously did not respond to or tolerate between two and four previous migraine preventive treatments. Erenumab might be an option for patients with difficult-to-treat migraine who have high unmet needs and few treatment options. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with migraine does not respond to, or cannot tolerate, oral preventive treatments. Erenumab is a novel CGRP-receptor antibody with preventive efficacy in migraine. We assessed its efficacy and tolerability in patients with episodic migraine in whom previous treatment with two-to-four migraine preventives had been unsuccessful. METHODS: LIBERTY was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study at 59 sites in 16 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years and had a history of episodic migraine with or without aura for at least 12 months, had migraine for an average of 4-14 days per month during the 3 months before screening, and had been treated unsuccessfully (in terms of either efficacy or tolerability, or both) with between two and four preventive treatments. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either erenumab 140 mg (via two 70 mg injections) or placebo every 4 weeks subcutaneously for 12 weeks. Randomisation was by interactive response technology and was stratified by monthly frequency of migraineheadache (4-7 vs 8-14 migraine days per month) during the baseline phase. Cenduit generated the randomisation list and assigned participants to groups. Participants, investigators, people doing various assessments, and the study sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a 50% or greater reduction in the mean number of monthly migraine days during weeks 9-12. Efficacy was measured in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who started their assigned treatment and completed at least one post-baseline monthly migraine day measurement. Safety and tolerability were assessed by recording adverse events and by physical examination, assessment of vital signs, clinical laboratory assessments, and electrocardiography. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03096834. The trial is closed to new participants, but the open-label extension phase is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 20, 2017, and Oct 27, 2017, 246 participants were randomly assigned, 121 to the erenumab group and 125 to the placebo group. 95 of 246 (39%) participants had previously unsuccessfully tried two preventive drugs, 93 (38%) had tried three, and 56 (23%) had tried four. At week 12, 36 (30%) patients in the erenumab had a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the mean number of monthly migraine days, compared with 17 (14%) in the placebo group (odds ratio 2·7 [95% CI 1·4-5·2]; p=0·002). The tolerability and safety profiles of erenumab and placebo were similar. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event was injection site pain, which occurred in seven (6%) participants in both groups. INTERPRETATION: Compared with placebo, erenumab was efficacious in patients with episodic migraine who previously did not respond to or tolerate between two and four previous migraine preventive treatments. Erenumab might be an option for patients with difficult-to-treat migraine who have high unmet needs and few treatment options. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma.
Authors: Linus Angenendt; Eike Bormann; Tobias Herold; Christoph Schliemann; Caroline Pabst; Vijay Alla; Dennis Görlich; Leonie Braun; Kim Dohlich; Christian Schwöppe; Stefan K Bohlander; Maria Francisca Arteaga; Klaus Wethmar; Wolfgang Hartmann; Adrian Angenendt; Torsten Kessler; Rolf M Mesters; Matthias Stelljes; Maja Rothenberg-Thurley; Karsten Spiekermann; Josée Hébert; Guy Sauvageau; Peter J M Valk; Bob Löwenberg; Hubert Serve; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Georg Lenz; Bernhard J Wörmann; M Christina Sauerland; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Wolfgang E Berdel; Utz Krug; Klaus H Metzeler; Jan-Henrik Mikesch Journal: Leukemia Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Messoud Ashina; Peter J Goadsby; Uwe Reuter; Stephen Silberstein; David W Dodick; Fei Xue; Feng Zhang; Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima; Sunfa Cheng; Daniel D Mikol Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Robert Belvís; Pablo Irimia; Patricia Pozo-Rosich; Carmen González-Oria; Antonio Cano; Javier Viguera; Belén Sánchez; Francisco Molina; Isabel Beltrán; Agustín Oterino; Elisa Cuadrado; Angel Gómez-Camello; Miguel Alberte-Woodward; Carmen Jurado; Teresa Oms; David Ezpeleta; Javier Díaz de Terán; Noemí Morollón; Germán Latorre; Marta Torres-Ferrús; Alicia Alpuente; Raquel Lamas; Carlos Toledano; Rogelio Leira; Sonia Santos; Margarita Sánchez Del Río Journal: J Headache Pain Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 7.277
Authors: Peter J Goadsby; Uwe Reuter; Michel Lanteri-Minet; Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima; Peggy Hours-Zesiger; Chrystel Fernandes; Shihua Wen; Nadia Tenenbaum; Aditi Kataria; Michel D Ferrari; Jan Klatt Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 9.910