Literature DB >> 30360915

Neurocognitive deficits in a transdiagnostic clinical staging model.

Sylvia Romanowska1, Glenda MacQueen1, Benjamin I Goldstein2, JianLi Wang3, Sidney H Kennedy4, Signe Bray5, Catherine Lebel5, Jean Addington6.   

Abstract

There is a growing literature which suggests that neurocognitive deficits may be markers of susceptibility for serious mental illness development. This study assessed neurocognitive functioning in a sample of youth at risk of serious mental illness across different clinical stages as described by McGorry and colleagues and compared them to healthy controls. The sample was 243 male and female youths aged 12-26 and included: asymptomatic participants with psychiatric risk factors (Stage 0; n = 41); youth with early mood or anxiety symptoms (Stage 1a; n = 52); youth with attenuated psychiatric syndromes (Stages 1b; n = 108); and healthy controls (n = 42). The neurocognitive battery included IQ measures and the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery. Participants in Stage 1b had lower scores than healthy controls on the composite score of neurocognitive performance, across all IQ measures, and in the domains of processing speed, working memory, attention and problem solving. They also had lower scores than subjects in Stage 0 across most IQ measures and in the domains of processing speed and working memory. This study increases what is known about neurocognitive performance associated with different stages of serious mental illness development.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical staging; Cognitive assessment; Neuropsychology; Psychiatric syndromes; Transdiagnostic; Youth mental health

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30360915     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  5 in total

1.  Neuropsychological Performance Among Individuals at Clinical High-Risk for Psychosis vs Putatively Low-Risk Peers With Other Psychopathology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zachary B Millman; Caroline Roemer; Teresa Vargas; Jason Schiffman; Vijay A Mittal; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 7.348

Review 2.  Abnormalities of confidence in psychiatry: an overview and future perspectives.

Authors:  Monja Hoven; Maël Lebreton; Jan B Engelmann; Damiaan Denys; Judy Luigjes; Ruth J van Holst
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Is it possible to stage schizophrenia? A systematic review.

Authors:  Clara Martínez-Cao; Lorena de la Fuente-Tomás; Ainoa García-Fernández; Leticia González-Blanco; Pilar A Sáiz; María Paz Garcia-Portilla; Julio Bobes
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 7.989

4.  Building a neurocognitive profile of suicidal risk in severe mental disorders.

Authors:  Anna Comparelli; Valentina Corigliano; Benedetta Montalbani; Adele Nardella; Antonella De Carolis; Lorenzo Stampatore; Paride Bargagna; Francesca Forcina; Dorian Lamis; Maurizio Pompili
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.144

5.  Neurocognition and the Suicidal Process.

Authors:  S B Rutter; N Cipriani; E C Smith; E Ramjas; D H Vaccaro; M Martin Lopez; W R Calabrese; D Torres; P Campos-Abraham; M Llaguno; E Soto; M Ghavami; M M Perez-Rodriguez
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.