| Literature DB >> 30360915 |
Sylvia Romanowska1, Glenda MacQueen1, Benjamin I Goldstein2, JianLi Wang3, Sidney H Kennedy4, Signe Bray5, Catherine Lebel5, Jean Addington6.
Abstract
There is a growing literature which suggests that neurocognitive deficits may be markers of susceptibility for serious mental illness development. This study assessed neurocognitive functioning in a sample of youth at risk of serious mental illness across different clinical stages as described by McGorry and colleagues and compared them to healthy controls. The sample was 243 male and female youths aged 12-26 and included: asymptomatic participants with psychiatric risk factors (Stage 0; n = 41); youth with early mood or anxiety symptoms (Stage 1a; n = 52); youth with attenuated psychiatric syndromes (Stages 1b; n = 108); and healthy controls (n = 42). The neurocognitive battery included IQ measures and the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery. Participants in Stage 1b had lower scores than healthy controls on the composite score of neurocognitive performance, across all IQ measures, and in the domains of processing speed, working memory, attention and problem solving. They also had lower scores than subjects in Stage 0 across most IQ measures and in the domains of processing speed and working memory. This study increases what is known about neurocognitive performance associated with different stages of serious mental illness development.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical staging; Cognitive assessment; Neuropsychology; Psychiatric syndromes; Transdiagnostic; Youth mental health
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30360915 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychiatry Res ISSN: 0165-1781 Impact factor: 3.222