Literature DB >> 30360608

Clinical, Epidemiological and Histopathological Aspects in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Nathalia Martines Tunissiolli1, Márcia Maria Urbanin Castanhole-Nunes, Érika Cristina Pavarino, Renato Ferreira da Silva, Rita de Cássia Martins Alves da Silva, Eny Maria Goloni-Bertollo.   

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is the primary liver cancer with high incidence and mortality rates. Currently one of the major etiologies for liver disease, HCC and liver transplantation is nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the epidemiological, histopathological and clinical aspects of HCC transplant patients, with emphasis on NAFLD etiology.
Methods: This study included all HCC patients submitted to liver transplantation from 2010 to 2016 of the University Reference Center. The analyzed variables were age, gender, ethnicity, causes that led to liver transplantation, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) dosage, histological aspects, recurrence, survival and NAFLD.
Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study being 80% men with a mean age of 58.3 ± 10.6 years. All patients were cirrhotic. The causes that led to the transplantation were the presence of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) (56.6% of the patients), an association of the virus with alcohol (20%), the presence of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) (20%), alcoholic liver disease (ALD) (50.9%) and NAFLD (25%). Of the latter, eight were diagnosed pre-transplantation and seven were NAFLD carriers without a previous diagnosis. Regarding the Edmondson-Steiner histological classification, 58.5% of the patients were classified as grade ≤ II. Conclusions: There is predominance of male patients with a mean age of 58.3 years. Degree ≤ II is the most frequent to the Edmondson-Steiner histological classification in the evaluated casuistic. HCV, ALD and NAFLD is the most common etiological agents found in the study. The (high) underestimated prevalence of NAFLD in the pre-transplanted patients is due to the fact that all patients presented cirrhosis, masking NAFLD signals. Creative Commons Attribution License

Entities:  

Keywords:  Liver cancer; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; liver transplantation; epidemiology; risk factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30360608      PMCID: PMC6291045     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev        ISSN: 1513-7368


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary liver cancer and the 5th most diagnosed type of cancer in men worldwide (Jemal et al., 2011; El-Serag, 2012). In 2012, approximately 78,000 new cases of liver cancer and 745,000 deaths were reported worldwide. The highest rates HCC are reported in East Asia and the Sub-Saharan Africa (Ferlay et al., 2015). HCC carcinogenesis is due to the interaction between environmental and genetic factors, among others, like cirrhosis, hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) infection, alcohol consumption, aflatoxin-contaminated food and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (Figure 1). The latter has been one of the most common causes of liver disease and the third leading cause of liver transplantation in the United States, behind only HCV and cirrhosis related to alcoholic liver disease (ALD) (Charlton et al., 2011).
Figure 1

Risk Factors for the Development Stage of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Tunissiolli et al., 2017). HCV (Hepatitis C virus), HBV (Hepatitis B virus), 1AIH (Autoimmune Hepatitis), 2Genetic Diseases: Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, Hemochromatosis, Porphyria and Tyrosinemia. *The Spectrum of NAFLD: Steatosis, NASH and Cirrhosis.

Risk Factors for the Development Stage of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Tunissiolli et al., 2017). HCV (Hepatitis C virus), HBV (Hepatitis B virus), 1AIH (Autoimmune Hepatitis), 2Genetic Diseases: Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, Hemochromatosis, Porphyria and Tyrosinemia. *The Spectrum of NAFLD: Steatosis, NASH and Cirrhosis. NAFLD is known to be the hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome (MS), defined as presenting three or more of the following factors: BMI ≥ 25 cm/m2, triglycerides >150 mg/dL, low HDL cholesterol levels (<40mg/dL in men and <50 mg/dL in women), high blood pressure and diabetes (Torres et al., 2012; Hassan et al., 2014). Early HCC diagnosis is important for patient survival. In cirrhotic patients, the diagnosis is non-invasive, based on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography with contrast. When the findings are not conclusive, histopathological diagnoses (biopsies) are necessary (EASL-EORTC Clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2012). Histopathological evaluation characterizes and differentiates liver biopsies as malignant or benign lesions. Among these evaluations is the Edmondson-Steiner classification, which classifies HCC according to the degree of cellular differentiation, corresponding to grades I, II, III and IV (Edmondson and Steiner, 1954; Gonzalez and Keeffe, 2011). Currently different HCC treatments are available, and their choice takes into account cancer stage, liver function, patient comorbidities and available resources (Maida et al., 2014). The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification categorizes patients as very early, early, intermediate, advanced and terminal stages. In the early stages, liver transplantation, resection and ablation are considered curative options for patients. Chemoembolization is indicated for the intermediate stage, while advanced patients may be treated with multikinase inhibitors, such as Sorafenib and Regorafenib. End-stage patients undergo palliative care to improve quality of life (Maida et al., 2014; Yang and Roberts, 2010; Forner et al., 2014; Mazzanti et al., 2016; Bruix et al., 2017). Due to the high prevalence of HCC worldwide, late diagnosis, high mortality rates and increased number of risk factors, we aimed to evaluate clinical, epidemiological and histopathological aspects of HCC patients undergoing liver transplantation. Considering the increasing prevalence of NAFLD as a cause of chronic liver disease, this etiology was emphasized in this study.

Materials and Methods

Study design and patients

A retrospective, descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out based on data from electronic medical records of HCC patients submitted to liver transplantation from 2010 to 2016, in a University Reference Center and, therefore, encompasses a large region in Brazil. An established form of the Liver Transplantation Service was used to collect epidemiological, clinical and histopathological data. All patients with an HCC diagnosis who underwent liver transplantation consecutively at this institution between 2010 and 2016 were included in the study. Those who did not obey the HCC condition as a diagnosis were excluded. Clinical, epidemiological and histopathological data were analyzed according to the following variables: gender, age, ethnicity, smoking, diabetes mellitus, presence of cirrhosis and the following etiologies: HBV, HCV, ALD, autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), genetic disease (Table 1), recurrence, survival and NAFLD. Patients diagnosed with NAFLD respected the following criteria: absence or moderate alcohol consumption, absence of exposure to potential hepatotoxins or associated medications and metabolic syndrome (MS: low HDL cholesterol, triglycerides >150mg/dL, hypertension, diabetes, and BMI ≥ 25 kg / m2) (Garvey et al., 2016) (Table 2). These same criteria were sought in patients who were not diagnosed for NAFLD to verify the possibility of undiagnosed NAFLD, since cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) may mask this diagnosis (Vernon et al., 2011; Chalasani et al., 2012). Pre-transplantation alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and the Edmondson-Steiner histological classification were also evaluated.
Table 1

Distribution of Patients According to Clinical and Epidemiological Aspects (n = 60)

Variables%
Gender (n,%)
 Male4880
 Female1220
Age (mean, standard deviation)
 Male57.310.4
 Female6210.6
Smoking (n,%)
 Yes2555.50
 No2044.50
Etiology of Chronic Liver Disease (n, %)
 HBV1220
 HCV3456.60
 ALD2650.90
 HCV+ALD1220
 NAFLD1525
 AIH11.60
 Hemochromatosis11.60
Comorbidity (n,%)
 Diabetes2440

AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; ALD, alcoholic liver disease; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Table 2

Components Considered for the Classification of Metabolic Syndrome and Used in the Diagnosis of NAFLD (Adapted from ACE Position Statement on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome, 2003; EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 2016).

ComponentsReference LevelsPatients diagnosed with NAFLD (n=8) mean ± SDPatients without previous diagnosis of NAFLD (n=7) mean ± SD
BMI≥ 25 kg/m229.3 ± 3.731.5 ± 3.8
Triglycerides>150 mg/dL76.7 ± 28.4105.8 ± 53.5
HDL Cholesterol45.5 ± 13.847.5 ± 17.8
 Males<40mg/dL
 Females<50 mg/dL
Blood pressure≥130mmHg or ≥85mmHg / treatment for SAH(-)(-)
Glycemia>100mg/dL / treatment for DM131.5 ± 72128.2 ± 46.1

BMI, Body mass index; DM, Diabetes mellitus; HDL, High density lipoprotein; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; SAH, Systemic arterial hypertension; SD, standard deviation.

Distribution of Patients According to Clinical and Epidemiological Aspects (n = 60) AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; ALD, alcoholic liver disease; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Components Considered for the Classification of Metabolic Syndrome and Used in the Diagnosis of NAFLD (Adapted from ACE Position Statement on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome, 2003; EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 2016). BMI, Body mass index; DM, Diabetes mellitus; HDL, High density lipoprotein; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; SAH, Systemic arterial hypertension; SD, standard deviation. Abdominal circumference measures were not obtained, because this is a retrospective study and these data are difficult to collect, since they are not included in all medical records. Most MS classification systems use the size of the abdominal circumference as a criterion. Thus, we chose to include the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists definition in this study, which applies the body mass index (BMI) instead of abdominal circumference (Garvey et al., 2016).

Statistical analysis

Electronic medical record data were analyzed through Microsoft Office Excel 2010 analyses, by means of descriptive statistics and tables containing the percentage calculations of the presented variables. The continuous parameters were expressed average and standard deviation. The survival period was calculated between the surgical intervention and the date of the last consultation, or death. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate using the Stats Direct Statistical Software, version 2.0.0 (England: StatsDirect Ltd). Values at p <0.05 were considered significant.

Ethical approval

The present study was conducted in full accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by Sao Jose do Rio Preto Medical School- FAMERP Ethics and Research Committee process no. 6228/2011. The requirement for written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study. All patient data were anonymized prior to the analysis.

Results

During the study period, 236 liver transplants were performed of which 60 patients presented HCC (25.4%). Of the total, 48 were men (80%) and 12 were women (20%). Overall mean age was 58.3 ± 10.6 years. For men, mean age was of 57.3 years ± 10.4 years, while women presented a mean age of 62 ± 10.6 years. Regarding demographic data, the patients reside mostly in the Southeastern region of Brazil (85%), while the rest inhabit the Center-West (5%), Northeastern (5%) and South (5%) regions. For the calculation of the percentage of the analysis of each variable, only patients who did not present all data in their medical records were excluded. Table 1 displays the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients. Initially, eight patients were diagnosed with NAFLD. Undergoing a detailed investigation of the MS risk factors, it was possible to classify another seven, previously undiagnosed, patients with NAFLD. These patients had three or more criteria that indicate MS and could, thus, be classified as NAFLD. In non-NAFLD patients, the mean BMI was of 25.1 kg/m2, well below the average presented by the reported or sub-notified NAFLD patients, of 29.3 kg/m2 and 31.5 kg/ m2, respectively (Table 2). The histopathological diagnoses were described according to the Edmondson-Steiner classification for 53 patients. No classification was possible for seven samples, due to the extensive necrotic characteristics of the tumors, making it impossible to measure the degree of cell differentiation. A total of 58.5% of the patients were characterized as grade ≤ II, while 41.5% were classified as grade ≥ III (Table 3).
Table 3

Distribution of Patients According to Histological Differentiation and the Edmondson-Steiner Classification (n= 53)

Edmondson Steiner’s Classification(n)Total(%)
Grade I131 ≤ II58.50%
Grade I/II5
Grade II25
Grade I, II, III222 ≥ III41.50%
Grade II/III17
Grade III2
Grade II/III/IV1
Distribution of Patients According to Histological Differentiation and the Edmondson-Steiner Classification (n= 53) Of the 42 patients in which alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was dosed, 37 presented levels below 20 ng/mL (88.09%); two presented levels ranging from 20 ng/mL to 55 ng/mL (4.76%) and three presented AFP levels higher than 150 ng/mL (7.14%). HCC post-transplant recurrence was observed in two patients (3.3%), and, in both, the tumor recurrence site was the liver. The means between the transplantation period and the tumor recurrence diagnosis was of 14.1 months for one patient and 9.5 months for the other, and both subsequently died. Regarding survival estimates, the Kaplan-Meier method was applied, with a mean survival estimate of approximately 12 months. The following values were obtained: 66% for NAFLD patients and 69% for non-NAFLD patients (log-rank value p = 0.712). These results were not significant among the analyzed variables and, therefore, did not influence post-transplant survival in HCC patients.

Discussion

Among the transplanted HCC patients, an epidemiological and clinical profile similar to those reported in the literature was identified. Male patients were more frequent (80%), corroborating data from Globocan (Ferlay et al., 2015). This male predominance is probably related to the greater exposure of men to risk factors, such as alcoholism, viral hepatitis and hormonal factors (Mittal and El-Serag, 2013; Keng et al., 2012). In Brazil, Carrilho et al., (2010) conducted a multicenter study with 1405 patients, and reported that 78% were male. Another study, also conducted in Brazil, over a 12-year period, found that 84.2% of HCC patients were men (Raphe et al., 2013). In a recent study in Saudi Arabia, men comprised approximately 3/4 of the HCC sample (n=128; 77.3%) (Qari and Mosli, 2017). Thus, the predominance of males among HCC patients was confirmed. The mean age of the patients was of 58.3± 10.6 years (57.3 for men and 62 for women). Other Brazilian epidemiological studies report means of 57 and 59 years (Paranagua-Vezozzo et al, 2014; Carrilho et al., 2010). In a multicenter study conducted in Turkey, the mean age of HCC individuals was 62 years old (Alacacioglu et al., 2008). The literature has shown that HCC incidence increases with age. However, hepatocarcinogenesis in regions where HBV prevalence is highest affects age, which ranges between 45 and 60, due to HBV infection epidemics through vertical transmission, an important risk factor for the development of HCC without cirrhosis in younger individuals (Boussouar et al., 2016; El-Serag and Kanwal, 2014). Studies in the West have pointed to other important risk factors for the development of HCC, such as NAFLD, diabetes mellitus and MS (El-Serag and Kanwal, 2014). NAFLD currently affects about 1/3 of the adult American population and, in conjunction with other co-factors, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus and steatosis, promotes hepatocyte injury, progressing to fibrosis, cirrhosis and, consequently, HCC (Gao and Yao, 2009; Tunissiolli et al., 2017). NAFLD is a clinical and pathological condition with a progressive and spectral character, in which excessive fat accumulation occurs in hepatocytes, while non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) represents the inflammatory and fibrotic form of progression for cirrhosis (Vernon et al., 2011; Hassan et al., 2014). Of the 236 transplanted patients in the study period, 60 were transplanted with HCC and eight were diagnosed with NAFLD as one of the causes that led to the transplant, while seven presented undiagnosed NAFLD. This calls attention to a growing number of patients with peculiar metabolic alterations that require specific care implementations, including public health policy aspects. It should be noted that the number of patients with undiagnosed NAFLD increased from 13.3% to 25% of the total number of patients with NAFLD in this HCC transplant sample, pointing to the potential for metabolic changes and their consequences before and after transplantation, which could go unnoticed without this diagnosis. Somboon et al., (2014) in a study performed with 308 HCC patients in Asia found a 2.4% rate of patients presenting with NAFLD. Another study reported 3% of patients with this etiology for HCC (Carrilho et al., 2010). In the present study, 25% of the patients presented NAFLD, highlighting the increase in the percentage of this etiology in the last years. Studies in developed countries, such as the USA, have justified obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes epidemics as contributing factors to this increase (Yang et al., 2010; Waller et al., 2015). Studies have also demonstrated changes in the causes that lead to liver transplantation and significant NAFLD increases, as well as among those in HCC patients (Charlton et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2014). Cirrhosis of any etiology is an important risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis, associated with approximately 80% to 90% of HCC cases worldwide (Fattovich et al., 2004; El-Serag and Kanwal, 2014; Balogh et al., 2016). Carrilho et al., (2010) reported cirrhosis in 98% of cases when evaluating 1,405 patients in several regions of Brazil. According to Somboon et al., (2014) in Thailand, of a total of 125 HCC patients studied, 90% presented cirrhosis. In the present study, cirrhosis was present in all of the patients, confirming the high incidence of cirrhosis as a risk factor. Cirrhosis masks the variables linked to MS and, therefore, the diagnosis of pre-transplantation NAFLD may go unnoticed. Malik et al., (2009) found a significant number of patients with cirrhosis due to NAFLD with MS characteristics, namely, significantly more obese patients with a higher incidence of diabetes and pre-transplant hypertension when compared to controls (Malik et al., 2009). Malnutrition, as well as dyslipidemia and MS, also mask obesity (Bonin-Guillaume et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2013). Peripheral vasodilation in the advanced phase of cirrhosis masks arterial hypertension, initially reducing the need for antihypertensive drugs, progressively leading to hypotension (Henriksen and Moller, 2006). NAFLD rates are underestimated due to the difficulty in diagnosis, since this is an asymptomatic disease implicated as a cause of cirrhosis, due to the disappearance of histological signs and diagnoses performed by clinical-laboratory findings in annual check-ups classified only as MS (Bugianesi et al., 2002; Adam et al., 2005; Sass et al., 2005). MS is represented by an association of risk factors related to systemic arterial hypertension, central obesity, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia, which were found in 25% of the patients evaluated in the present study. With the increasing upsurge of MS in the USA, a study comprising 3,649 HCC cases and 743 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cases was carried out in order to evaluate the association between MS and the development of these types of liver cancers. The study concluded that MS is indeed an important risk factor for these liver cancers (Wenzel et al., 2011). Thus, the notification of NAFLD cases could contribute to a more effective treatment when this condition is associated with other causes of cirrhosis. We emphasize that there has been an increase in this etiology worldwide, and the need to screen for pre-transplant signs and symptoms is extremely relevant. Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are major causative factors in the pathogenesis of MS and NAFLD (Reisin and Alpert, 2005; Paschos and Paletas, 2009). Studies have shown that patients with fatty pancreas present higher rates of MS when compared to those without pancreatic steatosis (Lee et al., 2009; Wu and Wang, 2013). Among the factors involved with MS, diabetes has been found at high rates in NAFLD patients. These patients also show higher mortality secondary to cardiovascular disease when compared to patients with non-diabetic NAFLD (Adams et al., 2010; Torres et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014). Regarding NAFLD progression, the theory of multiple hits stands out: as an initial condition, first-stage hepatic steatosis develops, followed by a succession of events, such as oxidative stress, intestinal endotoxin production and inflammation (multiple hits). Thus, the steatotic liver becomes vulnerable to multiple hits, resulting in hepatocyte lesions, inflammation, fibrosis and, consequently, HCC (Takaki et al., 2013; Buzzetti et al., 2016). In addition to the metabolic conditions associated with NAFLD, hereditary genetic-metabolic factors also play a role, such as glycogen deposition diseases, lipodystrophies, tyrosinemia, Weber-Christian disease and Wilson’s disease (Sass et al., 2005; Hassan et al., 2014). Metabolites resulting from drug intake are also risk factors for the development of hepatic steatosis, with methotrexate, amiodarone and tamoxifen among the most hepatotoxic (Sass et al., 2005; Torres et al., 2012). Some surgical procedures are also associated with NAFLD, such as jejunoileal bypass, gastroplasties and total parenteral nutrition (Paschos and Paletas, 2009). In relation to the etiology of liver disease, alcohol metabolites are responsible for the formation of adducts toxic to hepatocytes, resulting in defects in DNA repair and oxidative stress, becoming an important risk factor for cirrhosis and consequent HCC development (Testino et al., 2014). In the present study, 69.3% of the analyzed individuals were drinkers (consumption ≥ 80g alcohol/ day) and ALD was present in 50.9% of the cases. A multicenter study in Spain found that 30% of the analyzed individuals were alcoholics (Varela et al., 2010). Another epidemiological study conducted in Thailand reported that 26% of patients had ALD as an etiology for HCC (Somboon et al., 2014). The ALD rates found herein were more than two-fold higher when compared to other studies. In England, transplant rates, hospital admissions and mortality have increased, and ALD has made significant contributions to this statistic (Thomson et al., 2008; Green et al., 2017). Other important risk factors for the development of cirrhosis and HCC are chronic HCV and HBV infections, where prevalence varies according to region. Estimates attributed to viral hepatitis are 60% for HCV in Europe and the USA, and 60% for HBV in Africa and Asia (Fassio et al., 2010). A study conducted in Germany found that 20.5% of HCC cases displayed HCV infections (Kirchner et al., 2010). A multicenter study conducted in Turkey reported that 21.3% of patients presented positive HCV serology, with this condition becoming a precursor etiology for HCC in these cases (Alacacioglu et al., 2008). In the present study, 56.6% of the analyzed individuals presented HCV and 20% presented HBV, corroborating data obtained in the study performed by Carrilho and colleagues in which 54% and 16% rates were found for HCV and HBV, respectively, evidencing that the most frequent viral disease in Brazil is HCV (Carrilho et al., 2010). Currently, several serological markers for HCC detection and monitoring are available, with AFP being the most commonly applied. However, AFP presents greater specificity than sensitivity (Lok et al., 2010; Morimoto et al., 2012). In the present study, 88.09% (n= 37) of the cases presented normal levels of AFP (<20 ng/mL), 4.76% presented rates between 20 and 55 ng/mL and 7.14%, over 150 ng/mL. According to literature data, 29.2% of the analyzed cases of HCC patients had normal levels of AFP (<20 ng/mL), concluding would not be a good diagnostic marker (Raphe et al., 2013). A study conducted in Turkey with HCC patients reported that 38.9% had AFP levels <20 ng/mL and only 21.7% had levels >400 ng/mL, also demonstrating low marker sensitivity in the Turkish population presenting HCC (Alacacioglu et al., 2008). The high AFP normality index observed in the present study reinforces the fact that AFP is a low sensitivity serological marker. The Edmondson-Steiner classification indicated that the majority of patients (58.5%, n= 31) belonged to the intermediate grade (≤ II). Regarding histological analysis, when present, necrosis and hemorrhage injure hepatic tissue, making classification impossible (Edmondson and Steiner, 1954). Boussouar and colleagues failed to classify four HCC samples from patients on transplant waiting lists due to tumor necrosis (Boussouar et al., 2016). In the present study, due to the widely necrotic tumor area, seven HCC patient samples (11.7%) were not classified. The degree of histological HCC differentiation has clinical implications related to the greater potential for severity and risk of cancer recurrence (Tamura et al., 2001; Cillo et al., 2004). The recurrence of HCC post-transplantation has been reported, with rates ranging from 10 to 20%, being a major clinical concern (Waller et al., 2015). In the present study, 3.33% (n=2) of the patients presented HCC recurrence. It is known that a relationship between proliferative cellular activity in the post-resected cirrhotic liver and the occurrence or recurrence of HCC exists (Chiu et al., 1993). Because it is one of the malignant tumors with the highest lethality and a short survival, HCC is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an important public health problem (Ferlay et al., 2015). In a recent multicenter study in Brazil, AFP >200 ng/mL and non-chemoembolization were associated with lower survival rates (Bina-Possatto et al., 2017). In Brazil, Franca et al., (2004) found a survival of 84 and 74% in the 1st and 5th years after liver transplantation, respectively, similar data to those found in a study conducted in Europe, where, after a follow-up of 31 months, patient survival rates were was 84%, 74% and 74% in the 1st, 3rd and 5th years, respectively. In the present study, the results regarding survival were not significant among the analyzed variables. Even with the scientific advances and implementation of actions for early HCC detection, no improvement in the survival rate in the last three decades has occurred, because most patients start to present symptoms only at an advanced stage, limiting treatments (Papaiordanou et al., 2009). Thus, liver cancer studies are important to obtain better knowledge and improvement of risk factors, preventive measures and diagnostic methods. In conclusion, the prevalence of HCC among transplant recipients is 25.4%, with a mean age of 58.3 years and a predominance of males. The most frequent risk factors are HCV, ALD and NAFLD. NAFLD rates among transplanted HCC patients increased from 13.3% to 25% when considering an NAFLD diagnosis masked by cirrhosis. This data indicates that NAFLD is underestimated when transplants are performed. This reinforces the fact that NAFLD is considered to be the hepatic manifestation of MS, so the monitoring of these components (glycemia, triglycerides and HDL cholesterol levels, obesity and arterial hypertension) is important for the early NAFLD detection. Prospective and multicenter studies are relevant to create new diagnostic methods for MS and NAFLD, which are key to ensure progress in the longevity of liver transplant recipients.

Abbreviations

AFP: alpha-fetoprotein; AIH: autoimmune hepatitis; ALD: alcoholic liver disease; BMI: Body Mass Index; CC: cryptogenic cirrhosis; HBV: hepatitis B virus; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV: hepatitis C virus; HDL: High Density Lipoproteins; LT: liver transplantation; MS: metabolic syndrome; NAFLD: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Funding details

This study was conducted without internal or external funding.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Authors’ contribution

N.M.T. and M.M.U.C.N.: conception and design of study; N.M.T and M.M.U.C.N.: acquisition of data; N.M.T., M.M.U.C.N., R.C.M.A.S and E.M.G.B.: analysis and/or interpretation of data; N.M.T.: drafting of the manuscript; E.M.G.B., E.C.P., R.C.M.A.S and R.F.S: critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.
  63 in total

1.  Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Elisabetta Bugianesi; Nicola Leone; Ester Vanni; Giulio Marchesini; Franco Brunello; Patrizia Carucci; Alessandro Musso; Paolo De Paolis; Lorenzo Capussotti; Mauro Salizzoni; Mario Rizzetto
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Primary carcinoma of the liver: a study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies.

Authors:  H A EDMONDSON; P E STEINER
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Liver cirrhosis and arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Jens H Henriksen; Soren Moller
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a clinical review.

Authors:  David A Sass; Parke Chang; Kapil B Chopra
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Leon A Adams; James F Lymp; Jenny St Sauver; Schuyler O Sanderson; Keith D Lindor; Ariel Feldstein; Paul Angulo
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Impact of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Tamura; T Kato; M Berho; E P Misiakos; C O'Brien; K R Reddy; J R Nery; G W Burke; E R Schiff; J Miller; A G Tzakis
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-01

Review 7.  Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Giovanna Fattovich; Tommaso Stroffolini; Irene Zagni; Francesco Donato
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Definition of the metabolic syndrome: current proposals and controversies.

Authors:  Efrain Reisin; Martin A Alpert
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.378

Review 9.  Diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  A V C França; J Elias Junior; B L G Lima; A L C Martinelli; F J Carrilho
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 2.590

10.  Liver transplantation for the treatment of moderately or well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Alessandro Vitale; Marco Bassanello; Patrizia Boccagni; Alberto Brolese; Giacomo Zanus; Patrizia Burra; Stefano Fagiuoli; Fabio Farinati; Massimo Rugge; Davide Francesco D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

1.  Predictors of 5 year survival rate in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Arash Sarveazad; Shahram Agah; Asrin Babahajian; Naser Amini; Mansour Bahardoust
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 1.852

2.  Identification and Validation of Key Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Bioinformatics Analysis.

Authors:  Jia Wang; Rui Peng; Zheng Zhang; Yixi Zhang; Yuke Dai; Yan Sun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Scirrhous Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Pooled Data Analysis of Clinical, Radiological, and Histopathological Features.

Authors:  Anastasia Murtha-Lemekhova; Juri Fuchs; Erik Schulz; Anthe Suzan Sterkenburg; Philipp Mayer; Jan Pfeiffenberger; Katrin Hoffmann
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-10-22

4.  Identification of a DNA Damage Response and Repair-Related Gene-Pair Signature for Prognosis Stratification Analysis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yi Chen; Mengjia Huang; Junkai Zhu; Li Xu; Wenxuan Cheng; Xiaofan Lu; Fangrong Yan
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  Time trends and geographic distribution of hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil: An ecological study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Balbi; Jessica Pronestino de Lima Moreira; Ronir Raggio Luiz; Renata de Mello Perez; Heitor Siffert Pereira de Souza
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Identification of the DNA Replication Regulator MCM Complex Expression and Prognostic Significance in Hepatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ting Cao; Shi-Jie Yi; Li-Xin Wang; Juan-Xia Zhao; Jiao Xiao; Ni Xie; Zhi Zeng; Qi Han; Hai-Ou Tang; Yu-Kun Li; Juan Zou; Qing Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.