| Literature DB >> 30360551 |
Karolina Kilińska1, Judyta Cielecka-Piontek2, Robert Skibiński3, Daria Szymanowska4, Andrzej Miklaszewski5, Waldemar Bednarski6, Ewa Tykarska7, Anna Stasiłowicz8, Przemysław Zalewski9.
Abstract
The influence of ionising radiation on the physicochemical properties of meropenem trihydrate in solid state was studied for doses of e-beam radiation: 25 kGy and 400 kGy. In the first part of our studies, we evaluated the possibility of applying radiosterilization to obtain sterileEntities:
Keywords: Q-TOF; antimicrobial activity; meropenem; radiation sterilization; radiostability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30360551 PMCID: PMC6278425 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23112738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1FT-IR spectra of unirradiated and irradiated (25 kGy) meropenem.
Figure 2Raman spectra of unirradiated and irradiated (A-25 kGy) meropenem.
Figure 3EPR spectra of irradiated meropenem recorded 72 h and 310 h after radiation sterilization (radiation dose 25 kGy).
Figure 4Four types of radicals (“A”, “B”, “C” and “D”) proposed in Reference [17] and created after gamma irradiation which were. Arrows point to protons from sulfur coordination spheres.
Figure 5Concentration of free radicals vs. time after radiation sterilization (radiation dose 25 kGy).
Figure 6XRPD diffractograms of unirradiated and irradiated (25 kGy) meropenem.
Figure 7Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves of non-irradiated and irradiated (A-25 kGy, B-400 kGy) meropenem. The arrows indicate the changes in the DSC spectrum after irradiation.
Melting enthalpies and characteristic temperatures of meropenem from DSC data.
| (kGy) | Tonset (°C) | Tendset (°C) | ΔH (J/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 129.9 | 145.9 | 296.6 |
| 25 | 127.4 | 144.1 | 298.3 |
| 400 | 124.4 | 141.2 | 288.8 |
Figure 8TGA curves of non-irradiated and irradiated (25 kGy) meropenem.
MIC values (mg·L−1) of meropenem and irradiated meropenem samples.
| Microorganism | 0 kGy | 25 kGy | 400 kGy |
|---|---|---|---|
| mg/L | |||
| 250 | 250 | 250 | |
| 32 | 32 | 32 | |
| 250 | 250 | 250 | |
| 32 | 32 | 32 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 250 | 250 | 250 | |
| 125 | 125 | 125 | |
| 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 | |
| 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| 16 | 16 | 8 | |
| 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 250 | 250 | 250 | |
| 125 | 125 | 250 | |
Figure 9FT-IR spectra of unirradiated and irradiated (400 kGy) meropenem. The arrows indicate the changes in the FT-IR spectrum after irradiation.
Figure 10Raman spectra of unirradiated and irradiated (400 kGy) meropenem. The arrow indicates the change in the Raman spectrum after irradiation.
Figure 11XRPD diffractograms of unirradiated and irradiated (400 kGy) meropenem. The arrows indicate the changes in the diffractogram after irradiation.
Q-TOF accurate mass elemental composition and MS/MS fragmentation of the analyzed substances.
| Name | Retention Time | Measured Mass ( | Theoretical Mass ( | Mass Error (ppm) | Molecular Formula [M + H+] | MS/MS Fragmentation Ions ( | MS/MS Fragment Formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRP | 6.1 | 384.1573 | 384.1588 | 3.87 | C17H26N3O5S | 340.1668 | C16H26N3O3S |
| DP | 2.2 | 402.1670 | 402.1693 | 5.78 | C17H28N3O6S | 358.1771 | C16H28N3O4S |
Figure 12Structure of meropenem trihydrate (MRP) and its degradation product (DP).
Figure 13Total ion chromatogram (TIC) obtained under stress conditions (400 kGy) for meropenem trihydrate.
Figure 14Extracted ion chromatogram (EIC) obtained under stress conditions (400 kGy) for meropenem (m/z 384.1588) and its degradation product M1 (m/z 402.1693).
Figure 15Full MS (TOF) spectra for meropenem (MRP).
Figure 16Full MS (TOF) spectra for degradation product (DP).