Literature DB >> 30359980

Anti-Erosive Effect of Solutions Containing Sodium Fluoride, Stannous Chloride, and Selected Film-Forming Polymers.

Sávio J C Bezerra1, Samira H João-Souza1,2, Idalina V Aoki3, Alessandra B Borges4, Anderson T Hara5, Taís Scaramucci6.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-erosive effect of solutions containing sodium fluoride (F: 225 ppm F-), stannous chloride (Sn: 800 ppm Sn2+), and some film-forming polymers (Gantrez: Poly [methylvinylether-alt-maleic anhydride]; PGA: propylene glycol alginate; Plasdone: poly[vinylpyrrolidone]; and CMC: carboxymethylcellulose). Solutions were tested in an erosion-remineralization cycling model, using enamel and dentin specimens (n = 10, for each substrate). Distilled water was the negative control. Cycling consisted of 120 min immersion in human saliva, 5 min in 0.3% citric acid solution, and 120 min of exposure to human saliva, 4×/day, for 5 days. Treatment with solutions (pH = 4.5) was carried out 2×/day, for 2 min. Surface loss (SL) was evaluated with optical profilometry. Zeta potential of hydroxyapatite crystals was determined after treatment with the solutions. Data were statistically analyzed (α = 0.05). For enamel, all polymers showed significantly lower SL (in µm) than the control (11.09 ± 0.94), except PGA (10.15 ± 1.25). PGA significantly improved the protective effect of F (4.24 ± 0.97 vs. 5.64 ± 1.60, respectively). None of the polymers increased the protection of F+Sn (5.13 ± 0.78). For dentin, only Gantrez (11.40 ± 0.97) significantly reduced SL when compared with the negative control (12.76 ± 0.75). No polymer was able to enhance the effect of F (6.28 ± 1.90) or F+Sn (7.21 ± 1.13). All fluoridated solutions demonstrated significantly lower SL values than the control for both substrates. Treatment of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with all solutions resulted in more negative zeta potentials than those of the control, except Plasdone, PGA, and F+Sn+PGA, the latter two presenting the opposite effect. In conclusion, Gantrez, Plasdone, and CMC exhibited an anti-erosive effect on enamel. PGA increased the protection of F. For dentin, only Gantrez reduced erosion.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental erosion; Fluoride; Polymers; Stannous chloride

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30359980     DOI: 10.1159/000493388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

1.  Protective effect of calcium silicate toothpaste on enamel erosion and abrasion in vitro.

Authors:  Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf; Flávia Mauad Levy; Beatriz Gomes; Aline Dionizio Valle; Juliana Sanches Trevizol; Ana Carolina Magalhães; Andrew Joiner
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 2.  Topical Agents for Nonrestorative Management of Dental Erosion: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Darren Dhananthat Chawhuaveang; Ollie Yiru Yu; Iris Xiaoxue Yin; Walter Yu Hang Lam; Chun Hung Chu
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 3.  Film-Forming Polymers for Tooth Erosion Prevention.

Authors:  Marina Gullo Augusto; Tais Scaramucci; Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos; Idalina Vieira Aoki; Nadine Schlueter; Alessandra Bühler Borges
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.967

4.  Erosive tooth wear inhibition by hybrid coatings with encapsulated fluoride and stannous ions.

Authors:  Sávio José Cardoso Bezerra; Ítallo Emídio Lira Viana; Idalina Vieira Aoki; Maria Angela Pita Sobral; Alessandra Buhler Borges; Anderson T Hara; Taís Scaramucci
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Casein phosphopeptide combined with fluoride enhances the inhibitory effect on initial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to the saliva-coated hydroxyapatite disc.

Authors:  Xiaodie Wang; Limin Liu; Xiaoyan Zhou; Yongbiao Huo; Jinlong Gao; Haijing Gu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.