P D Miller1, G Hattersley2, E Lau3, L A Fitzpatrick4, A G Harris5, G C Williams4, M-Y Hu4, B J Riis6, L Russo7, C Christiansen6. 1. Colorado Center for Bone Research, Lakewood, CO, United States of America. 2. Radius Health, Inc., Waltham, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: ghattersley@radiuspharm.com. 3. Center for Health & Medical Research, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. 4. Radius Health, Inc., Waltham, MA, United States of America. 5. NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States of America. 6. Nordic Bioscience, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Center for Clinical and Basic Research, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abaloparatide is a 34-amino acid peptide that selectively binds to the RG conformation of the parathyroid hormone receptor type 1. It was developed for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. In ACTIVE, an 18-month phase 3 study (NCT01343004), abaloparatide increased bone mineral density (BMD), decreased the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures compared with placebo, and decreased the risk of major osteoporotic fractures compared with placebo and teriparatide. Here, we report a prospective, exploratory BMD responder analysis from ACTIVE. METHODS: Proportions of patients experiencing BMD gains from baseline of >0%, >3%, and >6% at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment were compared among the placebo, abaloparatide, and teriparatide groups in ACTIVE. Responders were defined prospectively as patients experiencing BMD gains at all 3 anatomic sites. RESULTS: At months 6, 12, and 18, there were significantly more >3% BMD responders in the abaloparatide group compared with placebo and teriparatide: month 6, 19.1% vs 0.9% for placebo and 6.5% for teriparatide; month 12, 33.2% vs 1.5% and 19.8%; month 18, 44.5% vs 1.9% and 32.0% (P < 0.001 for all comparisons of abaloparatide to placebo and to teriparatide). Findings were similar for the >0% and >6% responder thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with abaloparatide experienced increases in BMD than did those treated with placebo or teriparatide.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Abaloparatide is a 34-amino acid peptide that selectively binds to the RG conformation of the parathyroid hormone receptor type 1. It was developed for the treatment of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. In ACTIVE, an 18-month phase 3 study (NCT01343004), abaloparatide increased bone mineral density (BMD), decreased the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures compared with placebo, and decreased the risk of major osteoporotic fractures compared with placebo and teriparatide. Here, we report a prospective, exploratory BMD responder analysis from ACTIVE. METHODS: Proportions of patients experiencing BMD gains from baseline of >0%, >3%, and >6% at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine at 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment were compared among the placebo, abaloparatide, and teriparatide groups in ACTIVE. Responders were defined prospectively as patients experiencing BMD gains at all 3 anatomic sites. RESULTS: At months 6, 12, and 18, there were significantly more >3% BMD responders in the abaloparatide group compared with placebo and teriparatide: month 6, 19.1% vs 0.9% for placebo and 6.5% for teriparatide; month 12, 33.2% vs 1.5% and 19.8%; month 18, 44.5% vs 1.9% and 32.0% (P < 0.001 for all comparisons of abaloparatide to placebo and to teriparatide). Findings were similar for the >0% and >6% responder thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with abaloparatide experienced increases in BMD than did those treated with placebo or teriparatide.
Authors: David Kendler; Arkadi Chines; Patricia Clark; Peter R Ebeling; Michael McClung; Yumie Rhee; Shuang Huang; Robert Kees Stad Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Carsten W Schlickewei; Holger Kleinertz; Darius M Thiesen; Konrad Mader; Matthias Priemel; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Johannes Keller Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 5.923