Jessica F Baird1, Mary E Gaughan1, Heath M Saffer1, Mark A Sarzynski1, Troy M Herter1, Stacy L Fritz1, Dirk B den Ouden2, Jill Campbell Stewart3. 1. Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208, United States. 2. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208, United States. 3. Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly St, Columbia, SC 29208, United States. Electronic address: jcstewar@mailbox.sc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pairing a bout of high-intensity exercise with motor task practice can enhance motor learning beyond task practice alone, which is thought, in part, to be facilitated by an exercise-related increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of different exercise intensities on BDNF levels and motor learning while controlling for exercise-related energy expenditure. METHODS: Forty-eight young, healthy participants were assigned to one of three groups: high-intensity exercise [High], low-intensity exercise [Low], or quiet rest [Rest]. The duration of the exercise bouts were individually adjusted so that each participant expended 200 kcals regardless of exercise intensity. BDNF was measured before and after exercise or rest. After exercise or rest, all participants practiced a 3-dimensional motor learning task, which involved reach movements made to sequentially presented targets. Retention was tested after 24-h. BDNF genotype was determined for each participant to explore its effects on BDNF and motor learning. RESULTS: All participants equally improved performance, indicated by a reduction in time to complete the task. However, the kinematic profile used to control the reach movement differed by group. The Rest group travelled the shortest distance between the targets, the High group had higher reach speed (peak velocity), and the Low group had earlier peak velocities. The rise in BDNF post-exercise was not significant, regardless of exercise intensity, and the change in BDNF was not associated with motor learning. The BDNF response to exercise did not differ by genotype. However, performance differed between those with the polymorphism (Met carriers) and those without (Val/Val). Compared to the Val/Val genotype, Met carriers had faster response times throughout task practice, which was supported by higher reach speeds and earlier peak velocities. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that both low and high-intensity exercise can alter the kinematic approach used to complete a reach task, and these changes appear unrelated to a change in BDNF. In addition, the BDNF genotype did not influence BDNF concentration, but it did have an effect on motor performance of a sequential target reach task.
BACKGROUND: Pairing a bout of high-intensity exercise with motor task practice can enhance motor learning beyond task practice alone, which is thought, in part, to be facilitated by an exercise-related increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). The purpose of the current study was to examine the effect of different exercise intensities on BDNF levels and motor learning while controlling for exercise-related energy expenditure. METHODS: Forty-eight young, healthy participants were assigned to one of three groups: high-intensity exercise [High], low-intensity exercise [Low], or quiet rest [Rest]. The duration of the exercise bouts were individually adjusted so that each participant expended 200 kcals regardless of exercise intensity. BDNF was measured before and after exercise or rest. After exercise or rest, all participants practiced a 3-dimensional motor learning task, which involved reach movements made to sequentially presented targets. Retention was tested after 24-h. BDNF genotype was determined for each participant to explore its effects on BDNF and motor learning. RESULTS: All participants equally improved performance, indicated by a reduction in time to complete the task. However, the kinematic profile used to control the reach movement differed by group. The Rest group travelled the shortest distance between the targets, the High group had higher reach speed (peak velocity), and the Low group had earlier peak velocities. The rise in BDNF post-exercise was not significant, regardless of exercise intensity, and the change in BDNF was not associated with motor learning. The BDNF response to exercise did not differ by genotype. However, performance differed between those with the polymorphism (Met carriers) and those without (Val/Val). Compared to the Val/Val genotype, Met carriers had faster response times throughout task practice, which was supported by higher reach speeds and earlier peak velocities. CONCLUSION: Results indicated that both low and high-intensity exercise can alter the kinematic approach used to complete a reach task, and these changes appear unrelated to a change in BDNF. In addition, the BDNF genotype did not influence BDNF concentration, but it did have an effect on motor performance of a sequential target reach task.
Authors: Erin E Helm; Kathleen S Matt; Kenneth F Kirschner; Ryan T Pohlig; Dave Kohl; Darcy S Reisman Journal: Neurobiol Learn Mem Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Cameron S Mang; Nicholas J Snow; Katie P Wadden; Kristin L Campbell; Lara A Boyd Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Stephanie A McHughen; Paul F Rodriguez; Jeffrey A Kleim; Erin D Kleim; Laura Marchal Crespo; Vincent Procaccio; Steven C Cramer Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-09-10 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Richard Thomas; Line K Johnsen; Svend S Geertsen; Lasse Christiansen; Christian Ritz; Marc Roig; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eóin N Molloy; Karsten Mueller; Nathalie Beinhölzl; Maria Blöchl; Fabian A Piecha; André Pampel; Christopher J Steele; Ulrike Scharrer; Gergana Zheleva; Ralf Regenthal; Bernhard Sehm; Vadim V Nikulin; Harald E Möller; Arno Villringer; Julia Sacher Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 6.200