Literature DB >> 30358923

Comparison of light transmission aggregometry and multiple electrode aggregometry for the evaluation of patients with mucocutaneous bleeding.

Ping Sun1, Eileen McMillan-Ward2, Rajibul Mian3, Sara J Israels2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The "gold standard" diagnostic test for assessing in vitro platelet function, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), has limitations to application because of sample requirements. Whole blood or multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) using the Multiplate® analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) requires smaller blood volumes and less sample manipulation than LTA, making it an attractive clinical testing option. Direct comparisons of MEA with LTA for diagnosis of platelet aggregation abnormalities are few.
METHODS: Ninety-nine patients (66 F/33 M; median age 26 [range 2-86] years), referred for initial laboratory evaluation of mucocutaneous bleeding, had parallel MEA/LTA testing. Concentrations of ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), collagen, and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) that produced threshold responses in normal controls were used for testing patients.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine of the 99 patients (30%) had at least one abnormal agonist response by LTA; 15 of these patients had >1 abnormal agonist response. Thirty-six patients (36%) had at least one abnormal agonist response by MEA; 27 had >1 abnormal agonist response. Sensitivity/specificity of MEA relative to LTA: ADP, 0.70/0.72; AA, 0.71/0.85; collagen, 0.85/0.71; TRAP 0.25/0.84. Negative predictive values (NPVs) for MEA relative to LTA: ADP, 0.90; AA, 0.93; collagen, 0.97; TRAP, 0.96.
CONCLUSIONS: Specific abnormal results of MEA testing did not adequately predict specific abnormalities in LTA testing using threshold agonist concentrations. However, favorable NPVs suggest that MEA may be useful in screening patients for platelet aggregation abnormalities; those with normal MEA results not requiring further diagnostic testing by LTA.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  light transmission aggregometry; mucocutaneous bleeding; multiple electrode aggregometry; platelet aggregation; platelet function defects

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30358923     DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol        ISSN: 1751-5521            Impact factor:   2.877


  4 in total

Review 1.  PLATELET FUNCTION IN TRAUMA: IS CURRENT TECHNOLOGY IN FUNCTION TESTING MISSING THE MARK IN INJURED PATIENTS?

Authors:  Jacob B Schriner; Mitchell J George; Jessica C Cardenas; Scott D Olson; Kimberly A Mankiewicz; Charles S Cox; Brijesh S Gill; Charles E Wade
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Performance comparison of the PFA-200 and Anysis-200: Assessment of bleeding risk screening in cardiology patients.

Authors:  Jinxiang Piao; Chaeyoung Yoo; SunYoung Kim; Youn-Wha Whang; Cheol Ung Choi; Sehyun Shin
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Platelet function and filamin A expression in two families with novel FLNA gene mutations associated with periventricular nodular heterotopia and panlobular emphysema.

Authors:  Laura M Tanner; Shinji Kunishima; Elina Lehtinen; Tuukka Helin; Kirsi Volmonen; Riitta Lassila; Minna Pöyhönen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.578

Review 4.  Aspirin Resistance in Vascular Disease: A Review Highlighting the Critical Need for Improved Point-of-Care Testing and Personalized Therapy.

Authors:  Hamzah Khan; Omar Kanny; Muzammil H Syed; Mohammad Qadura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.