Literature DB >> 30358707

Laparoscopic Pelvic Exenteration With Radical Vaginectomy Using 3-Dimensional Vision and Multifunction Instrument.

Giuseppe Vizzielli1, Emanuele Perrone1, Sara Pizzacalla1, Giovanni Scambia1, Alfredo Ercoli2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The video article describes a laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration with radical vaginectomy using the 3-dimensional (3D) vision and multifunction instruments.
METHODS: This is a step-by-step video presentation of the laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration (Canadian Task Force classification III). Although the therapeutic benefit of the PE remains controversial, it is often performed in women with centrally recurrent pelvic tumors that previously received radiation therapy or in the locally advanced cases (ie, stage IIb-IVa) resistant to radiochemotherapy. The patient was a 61-year-old woman (body mass index 31.8 kg/m) with locally advanced squamous cervical cancer involving the bladder (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVa) submitted to chemoradiotherapy with no response and was admitted for surgery. The preoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan was negative for metastatic localizations.The surgery was performed including radical hysterectomy, cystectomy, and colpectomy with macroscopic resection margins larger than 2 cm; a subsequent Bricker's ileal conduit was completed. An Endoeye Flex 3D Videoscope (Olympsus System) and Thunderbeat device were used to perform it.
RESULTS: The operation was performed successfully with no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Total duration of surgery was 330 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The patient was discharged on day 8. The pathology report was positive for relapse of cervical cancer (tumor diameter = 4 cm) with infiltration of the vagina and the posterior bladder's muscle.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration with radical colpectomy using 3D vision and multifunction instrument is a fast and safe procedure. However, we notice that further prospective trials are needed to compare this technique with other open surgery and minimally invasive approach (ie, robotically).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30358707     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  3 in total

1.  Is a Vaginectomy Enough or is a Pelvic Exenteration Always Required for Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Cervical Cancer? A Propensity-Matched Study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vizzielli; Lucia Tortorella; Carmine Conte; Vito Chiantera; Valerio Gallotta; Nazario Foschi; Martina Arcieri; Gabriella Ferrandina; Anna Fagotti; Filiberto Zattoni; Giovanni Scambia; Alfredo Ercoli
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Robotic Surgery Techniques to Improve Traditional Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Tovah Williamson; Sang-Eun Song
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.789

3.  4K versus 3D total laparoscopic hysterectomy by resident in training: a prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  S Restaino; V Vargiu; A Rosati; M Bruno; G Dinoi; E Cola; R Moroni; G Scambia; F Fanfani
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.