Literature DB >> 30358504

How Can You Best Measure Reaction Times?

Eli Brenner1, Jeroen B J Smeets1.   

Abstract

Comparing many ways of measuring and analyzing reaction times reveals that the chosen method influences both the judged reaction time and, more importantly, conclusions about how the reaction time depends on the circumstances under study. The task was to lift one's finger in response to a tone. The response amplitude was either constrained or not. Constraining the amplitude made the response less vigorous. When the response was less vigorous it took longer to move far enough to release a switch or exceed the elasticity of the finger pulp. Although using a micro-switch would have made the reaction time appear to be longer for the constrained movement, reaction times determined in the most reliable ways were not systematically longer for the constrained movement. The most reliable method is to use extrapolation of the change in the average force that the finger exerts on the surface to estimate the reaction time.

Keywords:  Reaction time; latency; movement amplitude

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30358504     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2018.1518311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  8 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system physiology.

Authors:  John Rothwell; Andrea Antal; David Burke; Antony Carlsen; Dejan Georgiev; Marjan Jahanshahi; Dagmar Sternad; Josep Valls-Solé; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Measuring motion-to-photon latency for sensorimotor experiments with virtual reality systems.

Authors:  Matthew Warburton; Mark Mon-Williams; Faisal Mushtaq; J Ryan Morehead
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-10-10

3.  Features of Psychomotor Coordination in Adolescents with Neuropsychiatric Pathology Enrolled in a Standard Educational Program.

Authors:  Polina Mavrenkova; Natalia Pankova; Marina Lebedeva; Mikhail Karganov
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-10

4.  Reaching around obstacles accounts for uncertainty in coordinate transformations.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Dimitris Voudouris; Gunnar Blohm; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Not So Automatic Imitation: Expectation of Incongruence Reduces Interference in Both Autism Spectrum Disorder and Typical Development.

Authors:  Andrew Gordon; Raphael Geddert; Jeremy Hogeveen; Marie K Krug; Sukhvinder Obhi; Marjorie Solomon
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-04

6.  Fast responses to stepping-target displacements when walking.

Authors:  Yajie Zhang; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner; Sabine Verschueren; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Simultaneous Measurement of Objective and Subjective Accommodation in Response to Step Stimulation.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirota; Takeshi Morimoto; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Reaction Time Decomposition as a Tool to Study Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Emma Richards; Andrea Tales; Antony Bayer; Jade E Norris; Claire J Hanley; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis Rep       Date:  2021-08-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.